A few points:
- Shaq clogs the lane. Lebron is average at best as a shooter, but monster as a post player.
- Shaq sucks balls on defensive end because he is so slow.
- They need him for Dwight Howard.
- However, think of how much better they are playing at the end of the year without Shaq.
Cleveland better without Shaq
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Cleveland better without Shaq
-
HowIMetMyRondo
- Banned User
- Posts: 25
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
-
prekazi
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,576
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 27, 2007
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
-
RunMCR
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,511
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 10, 2010
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
Lebron is a monster as a post player? Since when?
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
-
HowIMetMyRondo
- Banned User
- Posts: 25
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
He always drives to the lane, and ALWAYS gets a foul call, OR gets the bucket.
As a shooter Lebron is no better than Stephen Jackson.
As a shooter Lebron is no better than Stephen Jackson.
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
-
HootieRules
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,506
- And1: 82
- Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
HowIMetMyRondo wrote:Cleveland better without Shaq
They need him for Dwight Howard.
Isn't this contridictory?
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
-
kickerboy10
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,464
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 13, 2004
- Location: Orlando
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
Maybe the op wanted to say one good thing about shaq that he might help them with.
Re: Cleveland better without Shaq
-
Benedict_Boozer
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,040
- And1: 5,696
- Joined: Aug 08, 2004