Should the NBA followed MLB's model and have only four teams

Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285

Falcon63
Ballboy
Posts: 19
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2011

Re: Should the NBA followed MLB's model and have only four teams 

Post#61 » by Falcon63 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:34 pm

I agree, but it means less money and TV ratings for the NBA, so they'd never do it. Too greedy.
User avatar
fallacy
RealGM
Posts: 10,496
And1: 607
Joined: Jan 11, 2010
       

Re: Should the NBA followed MLB's model and have only four teams 

Post#62 » by fallacy » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:35 pm

Maybe we should just cut march madness down to 16 teams instead of 68
**** Ron Artest
**** Marco Belinelli
Stephen Jackson aint bout dis lyfe
Patrick Beverly deserves to have his knee ripped to pieces
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 50,806
And1: 19,506
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Should the NBA followed MLB's model and have only four teams 

Post#63 » by Doctor MJ » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:36 pm

Rupert Murdoch wrote:make the playoffs from each conference every year? Let's face the facts. There are only five or six teams in any given year that have a legitimate shot at taking home the title. It doesn't make much sense to have 16 playoff teams. If the NBA has only eight teams make the playoffs every year, every regular season NBA game becomes more meaningful. There will be fewer teams who play like they're on auto-pilot. The NBA playoffs is way too long anyway. What's wrong with reducing a couple weeks to the postseason?


Your points regarding the NBA are good one's to consider.

Understand an irony though: It's the NBA's predictability that allows that extra round of playoffs to be harmless in terms of competition. MLB's danger with adding playoffs is that the sport is so random that adding playoffs just make it less and less likely the team that wins it all actually is the best team.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
CoffeeJanitor
Rookie
Posts: 1,189
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 01, 2011

Re: Should the NBA followed MLB's model and have only four teams 

Post#64 » by CoffeeJanitor » Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:16 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
Rupert Murdoch wrote:make the playoffs from each conference every year? Let's face the facts. There are only five or six teams in any given year that have a legitimate shot at taking home the title. It doesn't make much sense to have 16 playoff teams. If the NBA has only eight teams make the playoffs every year, every regular season NBA game becomes more meaningful. There will be fewer teams who play like they're on auto-pilot. The NBA playoffs is way too long anyway. What's wrong with reducing a couple weeks to the postseason?


Your points regarding the NBA are good one's to consider.

Understand an irony though: It's the NBA's predictability that allows that extra round of playoffs to be harmless in terms of competition. MLB's danger with adding playoffs is that the sport is so random that adding playoffs just make it less and less likely the team that wins it all actually is the best team.
Baseball is not random. I don't get where people get this nonsense idea.
*Kebo 4 MVP*
User avatar
SaveOurBullets
Rookie
Posts: 1,160
And1: 103
Joined: Feb 04, 2011

Re: Should the NBA followed MLB's model and have only four teams 

Post#65 » by SaveOurBullets » Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:49 am

CoffeeJanitor wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Rupert Murdoch wrote:make the playoffs from each conference every year? Let's face the facts. There are only five or six teams in any given year that have a legitimate shot at taking home the title. It doesn't make much sense to have 16 playoff teams. If the NBA has only eight teams make the playoffs every year, every regular season NBA game becomes more meaningful. There will be fewer teams who play like they're on auto-pilot. The NBA playoffs is way too long anyway. What's wrong with reducing a couple weeks to the postseason?


Your points regarding the NBA are good one's to consider.

Understand an irony though: It's the NBA's predictability that allows that extra round of playoffs to be harmless in terms of competition. MLB's danger with adding playoffs is that the sport is so random that adding playoffs just make it less and less likely the team that wins it all actually is the best team.
Baseball is not random. I don't get where people get this nonsense idea.


It kind of is. Every team typically has a winning percentage between .400 and .600, not that big, and the playoffs are always unpredictable.
^I agree

Return to The General Board