Page 25 of 28

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:21 am
by BVPN
SpeedyWindRose wrote:
ninjabelly wrote:
TRWJINC wrote:Dwight to Chicago is great for Orlando fans

LA Don't get him
Miami won't win a nba title aslong as Dwight and Rose are together
Orlando get a competive team

Lets face it magic won't be contenders for atleast 5 years.

:lol: , i'd be scared of CHI, but i think we can beat them still if we manage to find a center who can guard dwight.

Image


Why are you laughing? Jarron Collins on the Hawks does a very good job on Dwight.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:21 am
by Trader_Joe
A trade to Chicago makes no sense.

Their deal revolves around then staying competitive (fair enough, they need to win to sell tickets.) But in doing to they create a super team on par with the best Chicago teams of the 90s. There would no reason for them ( or anyone) to compete.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:22 am
by SpeedyWindRose
ninjabelly wrote:let me rephrase, not guard but limit him somehow; and if CHI can land howard it's just as possible for us to land a decent C.

Image

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:22 am
by speedb
BVPN wrote: :lol: , i'd be scared of CHI, but i think we can beat them still if we manage to find a center who can guard dwight.

Image[/quote]

Why are you laughing? Jarron Collins on the Hawks does a very good job on Dwight.[/quote]
Image

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:22 am
by inquisitive
Interesting:

Orlando GM Otis Smith has made it clear that he will trade Howard wherever the Magic get the best possible package, but the fact that Howard is willing to sign a five-year, $109 million extension with New Jersey makes it likely that the Nets can be the most aggressive in offering an attractive package. New Jersey has been pursuing possible third-team partners to strengthen the offer for Howard, front-office sources tell Y! Sports

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:24 am
by ninjabelly
SpeedyWindRose wrote:
ninjabelly wrote:let me rephrase, not guard but limit him somehow; and if CHI can land howard it's just as possible for us to land a decent C.

Image

still don't understand what's so funny, you think CHI is unstoppable just with rose and howard? please.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:24 am
by ShabazzMuhammad
Lets get one thing straight.

We all know that if Chicago is in fact making a push for Dwight, they are going to offer the most reserved/conservative package possible.

If you think Chicago is boing to deplete their roster just to land Dwight you're insane. I still think he ends up in New York's pond or here with the Lakeshow if the Paul deal can get approved fast enough.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:25 am
by SpeedyWindRose
ninjabelly wrote:
SpeedyWindRose wrote:
ninjabelly wrote:let me rephrase, not guard but limit him somehow; and if CHI can land howard it's just as possible for us to land a decent C.

Image

still don't understand what's so funny, you think CHI is unstoppable just with rose and howard? please.

Yeah, "just" Rose and Howard.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:26 am
by ninjabelly
SpeedyWindRose wrote:
ninjabelly wrote:
SpeedyWindRose wrote:Image

still don't understand what's so funny, you think CHI is unstoppable just with rose and howard? please.

Yeah, "just" Rose and Howard.

im not undermining either, but to say they're unstoppable with rose and howard is absurd.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:28 am
by Dr Genius
ShabazzMuhammad wrote:Lets get one thing straight.

We all know that if Chicago is in fact making a push for Dwight, they are going to offer the most reserved/conservative package possible.

If you think Chicago is boing to deplete their roster just to land Dwight you're insane. I still think he ends up in New York's pond or here with the Lakeshow if the Paul deal can get approved fast enough.


Actually, Chicago management does take calculated risks. The Bulls actually have too much assets right now. They can literally offer the entire kitchen sink around Noah, Deng, Bobcat pick, and 2 Bulls first rounders, and still field a championship contending team.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:28 am
by SpeedyWindRose
ninjabelly wrote:im not undermining either, but to say they're unstoppable with rose and howard is absurd.

Obviously they wouldn't be literally unstoppable, but they would be one of the greatest duos in NBA history.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:28 am
by jeff1624
Regarding Rose/Howard and Williams/Howard. I'd rather have the duo where the PG can give you 20, shoot the three consistently AND pass Dwight the ball... but that's just me.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:29 am
by ninjabelly
SpeedyWindRose wrote:
ninjabelly wrote:im not undermining either, but to say they're unstoppable with rose and howard is absurd.

Obviously they wouldn't be literally unstoppable, but they would be one of the greatest duos in NBA history.

Image

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:30 am
by LakerLegend
Heres why you take Bynum over Lopez and Noah:

Noah: Rebounds, Defense, No Offense. 26 years old.

Lopez: Offense, No Defense, No Rebounds.

Bynum: Offense, Defense, Rebounds.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:30 am
by Dr Genius
D-will and Howard combo sounds nice on paper. But, neither of them can take over the game and literally torch a team in the final minute. Drose can literally take over a game in the final seconds of the game.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:31 am
by ninjabelly
Dr Genius wrote:D-will and Howard combo sounds nice on paper. But, neither of them can take over the game and literally torch a team in the final minute. Drose can literally take over a game in the final seconds of the game.

where's your proof with this?

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:32 am
by jeff1624
Lakerfan17 wrote:Heres why you take Bynum over Lopez and Noah:

Noah: Rebounds, Defense, No Offense. 26 years old.

Lopez: Offense, No Defense, No Rebounds.

Bynum: Offense, Defense, Rebounds.



Heres why you take Lopez over Noah and Bynum:

Noah: Injury prone

Bynum: Even more injury prone

Lopez: has never missed a game in his career

--

See, I can do it too.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:32 am
by Lakers05
jeff1624 wrote:Regarding Rose/Howard and Williams/Howard. I'd rather have the duo where the PG can give you 20, shoot the three consistently AND pass Dwight the ball... but that's just me.


Not to mention Nene is arguably a better fit than Boozer. In addition, the Bulls owner doesn't want to pay the tax(in double territory), whereas the Nets owner presumably will.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:33 am
by NYK0605
Lakerfan17 wrote:Heres why you take Bynum over Lopez and Noah:

Noah: Rebounds, Defense, No Offense. 26 years old.

Lopez: Offense, No Defense, No Rebounds.

Bynum: Offense, Defense, Rebounds.

Lakers fans hyping up Bynum again.

Dude is trash enough already with that bum.

Re: BREAKING: Dwight officially requests a trade

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:33 am
by jeff1624
ninjabelly wrote:
Dr Genius wrote:D-will and Howard combo sounds nice on paper. But, neither of them can take over the game and literally torch a team in the final minute. Drose can literally take over a game in the final seconds of the game.

where's your proof with this?



That's the Bulls' fans excuse to criticize Deron. He can't 'close' games despite never showing any proof to validate their claims. Just ignore that.