Uhh, Nets are actually good
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Uhh, Nets are actually good
- Storm Surge
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,024
- And1: 17
- Joined: Dec 27, 2004
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Uhh, Nets are actually good
Real talk, they have an elite pg superstar level, an all star SG in joe Johnson, an above average starter in Gerald Wallace, a overhated but underrated banger pf in hump, and an above average center albeit overpaid.
They also have a strong bench, with Gerald Green and Mar$wag as well as the European dude.
50+ wins next year in the East.
They also have a strong bench, with Gerald Green and Mar$wag as well as the European dude.
50+ wins next year in the East.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,876
- And1: 599
- Joined: Nov 28, 2009
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Joe Johnson is only an all star because the SG position in the East is pathetic after Wade.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,030
- And1: 1,360
- Joined: Sep 03, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- heatwillbeback
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,800
- And1: 13,853
- Joined: Jul 26, 2003
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
yea, they are good. I would say third best in the East
Some have gotten on Brook a lot lately to the point he has become severely underrated. He is a guy more than capable to put up 20 ppg. Not a great rebounder/defender I get that, but name 5 centers who could score like him .
Some have gotten on Brook a lot lately to the point he has become severely underrated. He is a guy more than capable to put up 20 ppg. Not a great rebounder/defender I get that, but name 5 centers who could score like him .

Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,126
- And1: 1,355
- Joined: Jun 27, 2010
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
we'll have to wait and see, but i can see the arguments they're the "new and improved hawks."
A team whose ceiling is probably the ECF but again you "never know."
I'd just like to see them play.
A team whose ceiling is probably the ECF but again you "never know."
I'd just like to see them play.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,366
- And1: 408
- Joined: Nov 07, 2006
- Location: Eastern Europe
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Storm Surge wrote:
50+ wins next year in the East.
Yeah right, Joe Johnson's gonna be a difference of 30+ games.

Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- jazzfan1971
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 39,327
- And1: 8,581
- Joined: Jul 16, 2001
- Location: Salt Lake City
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Are you the new Atlanta?
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Uhh, Nets are actually good
- Magic Mamba
- Junior
- Posts: 434
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jun 22, 2008
Uhh, Nets are actually good
Treadmill team if you ask me , idk if they will even win the second seed

Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,701
- And1: 16,371
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
I'm guessing they're the 2nd best team in the East next year
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- junot111
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,437
- And1: 3,320
- Joined: Jan 31, 2007
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
TheGreatSatan wrote:Storm Surge wrote:
50+ wins next year in the East.
Yeah right, Joe Johnson's gonna be a difference of 30+ games.
Joe Johnson + healthy Brook + Gerald Wallace for full season
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- heatwillbeback
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,800
- And1: 13,853
- Joined: Jul 26, 2003
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
TheGreatSatan wrote:Storm Surge wrote:
50+ wins next year in the East.
Yeah right, Joe Johnson's gonna be a difference of 30+ games.
Brook healthy is another addition if that ends up being the case
and GWallace for more than a month.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Magic Mamba wrote:Treadmill team if you ask me , idk if they will even win the second seed
Shaheen - the biggest nets homer on realgm
rhp1990 wrote:y'all need to just ignore shaheen. Dont feed the troll. He needs to realize if this many people are calling him a moron then maybe he is a moron/ignorant when it comes to ball.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,056
- And1: 205
- Joined: Oct 30, 2006
- Location: Land of Monarchy
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
CP3 couldn't lead Griffin and the Clips anywhere, I'm thinking Deron can't do anything with Joe "I'm awful in the playoffs" Johnson, G-Wallace and Lopez.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,381
- And1: 3,247
- Joined: Mar 29, 2010
- Location: Fl
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Now the games against the Knicks will be interesting
They are pretty even
But IMO Knicks win in 7
They are pretty even
But IMO Knicks win in 7
Stop being so disrespectful.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,670
- And1: 705
- Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
I never understood the hate for the nets. People would rather see the lakers get a super team than the nets be a contender. Why.
They didn't give them any credit when they went to back to back finals. And they won't now. This team is a good team on paper and hopefully on court. They will compliment each other very well.
They didn't give them any credit when they went to back to back finals. And they won't now. This team is a good team on paper and hopefully on court. They will compliment each other very well.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- jeff1624
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,127
- And1: 1,076
- Joined: Jan 19, 2005
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
TheGreatSatan wrote:Storm Surge wrote:
50+ wins next year in the East.
Yeah right, Joe Johnson's gonna be a difference of 30+ games.
Oh please...
Lopez played 5 games and never played with Wallace and Wallace played like 7 total games with Deron. It isn't about just Johnson. Try Wallace, Johnson, Lopez and a more effective Deron since he can't be doubled on every possession now.
But this comment is irrelevant... whenever someone calls other people out on their stupidity, like I'm doing with you, they simply get ignored.
Dat Leadership
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,622
- And1: 16
- Joined: May 23, 2007
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
jazzfan1971 wrote:Are you the new Atlanta?
LOL. You mean 2nd round ceiling team with Joe Johnson?
They could be. Then again Deron Williams could give them ECF potential
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,670
- And1: 705
- Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
I never understood the hate for the nets. People would rather see the lakers get a super team than the nets be a contender. Why.
They didn't give them any credit when they went to back to back finals. And they won't now. This team is a good team on paper and hopefully on court. They will compliment each other very well.
They didn't give them any credit when they went to back to back finals. And they won't now. This team is a good team on paper and hopefully on court. They will compliment each other very well.
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
- N Ireland Nets
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,618
- And1: 276
- Joined: Feb 09, 2011
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Storm Surge wrote:Real talk, they have an elite pg superstar level, an all star SG in joe Johnson, an above average starter in Gerald Wallace, a overhated but underrated banger pf in hump, and an above average center albeit overpaid.
They also have a strong bench, with Gerald Green and Mar$wag as well as the European dude.
50+ wins next year in the East.
I believe Teletovic will start as PF for us with Hump being the first big off the bench. Teletovic said he was more concerned with playing time than money and thats why he took less money that the full MLE agreed at the start of FA. So im thinking he's been told he has a good shot at starting for us.
Besides I hate Hump beside Lopez, he is an awful defender but a very good rebounder and energy guy.
Need to sign a back up center now and try our best to get Green back. So potentially we will have a roster like:
Williams / Taylor
Johnson / Brooks / Stackhouse
Wallace / Green
Teletovic / Hump
Lopez / vet min
Still plenty of work to do in the offseason in regards filling out the team

Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,030
- And1: 1,360
- Joined: Sep 03, 2006
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Uhh, Nets are actually good
Sharcm1 wrote:I never understood the hate for the nets. People would rather see the lakers get a super team than the nets be a contender. Why.
They didn't give them any credit when they went to back to back finals. And they won't now. This team is a good team on paper and hopefully on court. They will compliment each other very well.
It's a combination of Nets fans acting like idiots, the Lakers actually trading something of value (2nd best C in the league vs. Brook Lopez), and keeping Dwight from getting what he wants after all of this crap he's been pulling for the past 7 months.