Would you rather have?

Moderators: magnumt, ken6199, BombsquadSammy, Yuri Vaultin, Tarik Black, Mr. E, bwgood77, Rhettmatic, Duke4life831, KF10, GimmeDat, Knickstape1214, DayofMourning, Capn'O, Dirk, CoreyGallagher

User avatar
Flash Falcon X
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,995
And1: 1,479
Joined: Oct 19, 2010

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#31 » by Flash Falcon X » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:42 pm

Actually, shooters are pretty fun to watch.
User avatar
Posts: 298
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 04, 2009

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#32 » by loganido » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:46 pm

Yeah, a guy dropping 90% from the deep and getting wins, no matter how horrible he is in other aspects, people would just be crazy about it. That's inhuman and would actually catch a lot of new fans into the NBA
User avatar
General Manager
Posts: 8,888
And1: 1,985
Joined: Mar 30, 2012

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#33 » by Woodsanity » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:02 pm

80-90% from anywhere on the court? The scoring efficiency would be insane. He would be undisputed GOAT even if he couldn't do anything else on the court and got burned on defense every time.
twix2500 wrote:If Lebron went to NY and Melo to Miami, Melo would have a trophy and Lebron would not.

Tiesto_Lakers wrote:The more I watch basketball, the more I realize that Kobe, in his absolute prime (2006-2008), was a top 2 player of all-time, only second to Jordan.
Banned User
Posts: 5,429
And1: 33
Joined: Oct 08, 2009

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#34 » by BJ43 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:51 am

This guy isn't winning you any championships..I have a dog on my team that can steal the ball on 80-90% of possessions, i get him to guard your guy , game over
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,985
And1: 336
Joined: Jan 01, 2011

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#35 » by GreenHat » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:25 am

If he's horrible at everything else he's not getting 40+ points. He would get ripped every time he has the ball and scored on every time. And if he shoots that well the other team will focus in on him and not let him get a shot off
Your emotions fuel the narratives that you create. You see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. You ascribe meaning when it is not there. You create significance when it is not present.
User avatar
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,794
And1: 1,769
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Location: off looking for a "high oiled machine"

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#36 » by rockmanslim » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:31 am

I want it all

"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013

Banned User
Posts: 5,429
And1: 33
Joined: Oct 08, 2009

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#37 » by BJ43 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:09 am

rockmanslim wrote:I want it all

That's what she said.
User avatar
GOTB: Mean Girls
Posts: 18,592
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Location: Formerly Mats272-Goat until I found Sofia The First...

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#38 » by Sofia » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:44 am

Yes I would have him on the team, yes he is GOAT.

Now what you rather? Kiss John Goodman above the belt or Kiss Rosie O'Donnel below the belt?
Banned User
Posts: 1,039
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 15, 2011

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#39 » by 28reloaded » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:48 am

If there was some random unathletic guy that could shoot 80% from 3 by just throwing up random ugly shots, i.e. side armed falling out of bounds, it would literally kill the league. The NBA would be a shell of itself by the time he retired. It would be compared to bowling and would lose interest once the 1-2 year wowfactor wore off on the guy.

For a team, the guy would guarantee championships. For the league, he would kill its brand after a certain period of time.
The Boot Room
Posts: 146
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 23, 2012

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#40 » by The Boot Room » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:45 am

boring to watch a guy scoring 50 points per game with 80%? you like defense man...would be best player ever in the game, no doubt about that.
User avatar
Posts: 2,550
And1: 142
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#41 » by Bskey » Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:42 pm

I don't get the entertainment concern, I get way more into it when a guy catches fire with his jumpers than lay-ups and free throws.
User avatar
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,272
And1: 23
Joined: Sep 08, 2011
Location: Madrid - Karl wants JaVale McGee to be more like Tim Duncan LOL

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#42 » by SVictor » Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:59 pm

Does he have two wrists in the same arm?
knickstape1214 wrote:Just so we can see every side of this thread before I close it -

Melo sucks, Knicks sucks, LeBron sucks, Durant is humble, Durant is fake, Durant sucks, Serge Ibaka.
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 01, 2012

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#43 » by branny » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:03 pm

I'd love to watch a guy of this caliber play. 80% from anywhere basically? Just incredible
User avatar
Ming Kong!
Posts: 24,480
And1: 26
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#44 » by Ming Kong! » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:13 pm

maxpower88 wrote:Ok, I guess the general consensus is that you would all play him.

Now for part 2.

After 15 years in the league, the player retires. Since he was such a great shooter and could score from anywhere, he won 8 NBA titles being the focal point of the team.

He has career averages of 48 points (.850 FG%), 0.5 rebounds, 1 assists, 0 steals, 0 blocks, 2 turnovers 3 fouls.

Accolades include:
-8x NBA Champion
-5x NBA Finals MVP
-12x All-Star
-10x All-NBA First Team
-15x NBA Scoring Champion

So the question: is said player better than Jordan? All he can do is score from jump shots, but the scoring translates into championships.

It's a tad ridiculous to believe anyone who can manage to be on the court long enough to get 48 points could not get more than .5rpg 0spg and 0bpg, but the whole situation is pretty ridiculous. Anyways, if the guy is able to win you 8 titles and get 5 finals MVPs, I highly doubt he would just get 3MVPs, I would think he could get a 5-6 of them. Also how in the guy only All-NBA 10 times? Seems like the GOAT would make it every year, except maybe his last year if he suddenly had a major decline (I doubt that could happen to a GOAT candidate) or some year where he suffered a major injury. Someone who averages 40ppg is All-NBA every year, because there are not 2 guards, or 2 forwards in any given year in history that would top an average 48ppg player on 85% shooting.
User avatar
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,444
And1: 133
Joined: Oct 16, 2010

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#45 » by Quinarvy » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:15 pm

So, we're talking about Super-Korver?

You can market that if you give him Stacey King to yell "HOT SAUCE" every game.

- Stacey King
User avatar
Joao Saraiva
General Manager
Posts: 8,899
And1: 2,811
Joined: Feb 09, 2011

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#46 » by Joao Saraiva » Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:23 am

It would be flashy making 80% from 3. Are you kidding me? It would LBJ vs Bucks or T-Mac vs Spurs all over again.
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan
User avatar
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,667
And1: 171
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Location: Australia

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#47 » by Voice_of_Reason » Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:31 am

ladies love the long ball
Stat Padder
Posts: 269
And1: 7
Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Location: Lagos

Re: Would you rather have? 

Post#48 » by Stat Padder » Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:39 am

Gimme the shotjacker
I would run the Wilt Chamberlain offense
I aplogise for my poor english as I a from nigeria :)

Return to The General Board