Page 1 of 12
Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:39 pm
by keloms
Now that it looks like Kevin Martin isn't being renewed, the pick from the Raptors ended up being #12, and Lamb having lowered expectations, do you consider it a failure?
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:41 pm
by Jordan45822
depends if they can do a S&T for Martin (if he bolts)
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:42 pm
by ManualRam
tbd
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:43 pm
by Luigi
I think people are fixating on the Thunder's lack of success, but I chalk that up to an injured Westbrooke.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:47 pm
by ReturnofMVP3
Luigi wrote:I think people are fixating on the Thunder's lack of success, but I chalk that up to an injured Westbrooke.
If Westbrook goes down and they still have Harden I think they could still go the the WCF at least.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:50 pm
by Fobbie
Luigi wrote:I think people are fixating on the Thunder's lack of success, but I chalk that up to an injured Westbrooke.
Still doesn't change the fact that they traded a top 3 sg/15 player in his prime for #12 pick, Lamb, and K-Mart. Unless Lamb or the center they pick up with the 12 pick turns into a solid player, they basically gave away Harden..
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:51 pm
by Archerbro
tbd, but it isn't looking good.
especially if k mart bolts.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:51 pm
by jamesnamida
Needs one more year, thd.
Lets see how harden does in his 2 md year, and lambs role and who they draft with the raptors pick + get for Martin. Martin
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:52 pm
by Frank Mulely
Bad trade and if it's true Harden was going to sign at a discount in return for a no-trade clause then it is an epically bad trade.
There's just no scenario they were better off trading him last summer for crumbs instead of playing it out one more year. He was going to be restricted and they could have S&T'd him....ah nevermind we'd gone over this a million times

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:55 pm
by Neutral 123
In the NBA trading quality for quantity almost always fails. A guy like Harden is near impossible to replace. Huge fail, and it's not even close.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:57 pm
by SlowPaced
If Jeremy Lamb fails, definitely. We'll see though.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:57 pm
by Hangtime84
They could have done better
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:58 pm
by BO55
Not gonna write of Jones III and Lamb yet.
But yeah Harden on another level.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 10:59 pm
by MKG35
Yes they should have kept Harden but how would he develop on this OKC team. He wouldn't have averaged 20-26ppg. He would have been a 18ppg player and occasionally take over the scoring with big numbers.
He's now the #1 option and scorer, he couldn't and wouldn't have gotten that chance with OKC. He HAD to come off the bench like Manu does with the Spurs, he didn't want to (anymore). It wouldn't make any sense to have a starting 5 of WB-Harden-Durant-Ibaka-Perkins.
Let's just hope Lamb develops in something good.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 11:03 pm
by BeasleyTheBeast
Jeremy Lamb still got potential, and nobody knows how good Steve Adams can be
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 11:07 pm
by Luigi
Fobbie wrote:Luigi wrote:I think people are fixating on the Thunder's lack of success, but I chalk that up to an injured Westbrooke.
Still doesn't change the fact that they traded a top 3 sg/15 player in his prime for #12 pick, Lamb, and K-Mart. Unless Lamb or the center they pick up with the 12 pick turns into a solid player, they basically gave away Harden..
I don't think Harden is a top 15 player. He's got a nice 3 pt / drive for free throws game, but he's missing a lot on both ends to be top 15.
I could be misremembering, but wasn't it a financial choice between Harden and Westbrook?
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 11:10 pm
by Kayjay
Luigi wrote:I could be misremembering, but wasn't it a financial choice between Harden and Westbrook?
meaningfully the choice was between harden and ibaka
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 11:10 pm
by LikeABosh
We'll have to see how Lamb and Shabazz turn out
Actually, nvm. It was a bad trade
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 11:13 pm
by PacificBlazer
They blew it. When you have a guy like Harden, you rarely will get back anything that comes close to his value, no matter how many players you stack up.
Franchise changing trade.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Posted: Mon Jul 1, 2013 11:14 pm
by Fobbie
Luigi wrote:Fobbie wrote:Luigi wrote:I think people are fixating on the Thunder's lack of success, but I chalk that up to an injured Westbrooke.
Still doesn't change the fact that they traded a top 3 sg/15 player in his prime for #12 pick, Lamb, and K-Mart. Unless Lamb or the center they pick up with the 12 pick turns into a solid player, they basically gave away Harden..
I don't think Harden is a top 15 player. He's got a nice 3 pt / drive for free throws game, but he's missing a lot on both ends to be top 15.
I could be misremembering, but wasn't it a financial choice between Harden and Westbrook?
Between Ibaka and Harden. LOL i was being generous saying top 15.. Some think he's top 10. But either way, a 23 year old franchise player for right now seem to be peanut..