CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

User avatar
KI-DW-TT-AB
Veteran
Posts: 2,651
And1: 2,309
Joined: Dec 22, 2013
Location: The Bando
Contact:
       

CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#1 » by KI-DW-TT-AB » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:22 am

Before the official start of free agency on July 1, Adrian Wojnarowski reported that the Miami Heat had "the framework of deals in place" with LeBron James, Chris Bosh, Dwyane Wade and Udonis Haslem to remain with the team.

"Everybody has their [contract] number and has left a little bit of room to let [Pat Riley] maneuver," one source briefed on the contract discussions reportedly told Wojnarowski.

The NBA's collective bargaining agreement, however, does not allow a team and players to have an "express or implied" deal in place in what essentially becomes a restructured contract.

The risk of loss for some Wade and Haslem would be severe since the contracts they opted out of are considered vastly more lucrative than what they would command as free agents on the open market.

The following text is from Article XIII of the CBA in regards to circumvention:

Section 2. No Unauthorized Agreements.

(a) At no time shall there be any agreements or transactions of any kind (whether disclosed or undisclosed to the NBA), express or implied, oral or written, or promises, undertakings, representations, commitments, inducements, assurances of intent, or understandings of any kind (whether disclosed or undisclosed to the NBA), between a player (or any person or entity controlled by, related to, or acting with authority on behalf of, such player) and any Team (or Team Affiliate):

(i) concerning any future Renegotiation, Extension, or other amendment of an existing Player Contract, or entry into a new Player Contract;

-----

(c) A violation of Section 2(a) or 2(b) above may be proven by director circumstantial evidence, including, but not limited to, evidence that a Player Contract or any term or provision thereof cannot rationally be explained in the absence of conduct violative of Section 2(a) or 2(b).


http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/23 ... -Contracts
Image
#FreeGuwop
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,838
And1: 32,278
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: CBA Explicit In Not Allowing Prearranged Restructured Co 

Post#2 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:25 am

it's illegal, but how are they going to prove it?

unless of course one of them decides to do what joe smith did, i don't see how they can prove it if everyone keeps mum
Image
User avatar
KI-DW-TT-AB
Veteran
Posts: 2,651
And1: 2,309
Joined: Dec 22, 2013
Location: The Bando
Contact:
       

Re: CBA Explicit In Not Allowing Prearranged Restructured Co 

Post#3 » by KI-DW-TT-AB » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:27 am

Dr Aki wrote:it's illegal, but how are they going to prove it?

unless of course one of them decides to do what joe smith did, i don't see how they can prove it if everyone keeps mum

yeah probably why they're doing these agent/team meetings, just for show.

& why lebron opted out like a week prior others.

& why he's demanding the max.

but NBA doesn't exactly work like the US court system, so, the smoke screens & technicalities might not work.
Image
#FreeGuwop
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,838
And1: 32,278
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#4 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:29 am

circumstantial evidence is just that, circumstantial evidence

there's still no actual evidence
Image
User avatar
FinNasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 2,820
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#5 » by FinNasty » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:30 am

Look at the evidence!!! Woj posted an article!
Image
eagles nut
Analyst
Posts: 3,505
And1: 266
Joined: Feb 22, 2001

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#6 » by eagles nut » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:34 am

Exactly. If the league disallows the signings and the union challenges it, all the league has to do is tell the arbitrator "But it's Woj!".
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,838
And1: 32,278
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#7 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:38 am

you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove
Image
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,323
And1: 754
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#8 » by jefe » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:54 am

Dr Aki wrote:you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove


All of those are examples of direct evidence - the CBA section quoted above permits direct or circumstantial evidence.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,838
And1: 32,278
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#9 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jul 1, 2014 11:59 am

jefe wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove


All of those are examples of direct evidence - the CBA section quoted above permits direct or circumstantial evidence.


it's a tad broad, and a little impossible to police
Image
User avatar
pylb
General Manager
Posts: 8,190
And1: 3,695
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
Location: Paris
 

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#10 » by pylb » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:02 pm

Dr Aki wrote:you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove

Section C disagrees.

I doubt anything happens, but the league doesn't need to prove anything.
User avatar
FinNasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 2,820
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#11 » by FinNasty » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:03 pm

The players can all decide to opt out and take less assuming it is offered. And it's an easy assumption on their part that they'd get offered new contracts by the team in an attempt to bring them back. Why wouldn't the team want to bring them back? There's nothing to worry about on the players part. Why would they have any fear that the Heat wouldn't want to try to bring them back at all costs if they opted out?

So, they players get together, hash out what kinda money they all feel they would need while leaving enough to allow the team to get them more help. Opt out. And then ask for that amount the players determined when FA starts.

None of that is against the rules...
Image
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,838
And1: 32,278
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#12 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:04 pm

pylb wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove

Section C disagrees.

I doubt anything happens, but the league doesn't need to prove anything.


that's the thing, what if say wade or haslem opt out, only to re-sign for more years for sig. greater than the amount owed to them.

that can be rationally explained, there's already a precedent - the spurs had the RJ contract a few years ago
Image
User avatar
pylb
General Manager
Posts: 8,190
And1: 3,695
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
Location: Paris
 

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#13 » by pylb » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:09 pm

Dr Aki wrote:
pylb wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove

Section C disagrees.

I doubt anything happens, but the league doesn't need to prove anything.


that's the thing, what if say wade or haslem opt out, only to re-sign for more years for sig. greater than the amount owed to them.

that can be rationally explained, there's already a precedent - the spurs had the RJ contract a few years ago

That's why section C contains the almighty "including, but not limited to" words.

Really, if the league wants to do something, it can do it. Doesn't need to justify itself. It won't do so because it could get tangled in a legal mess and it would sow discord amongst owners.

Nets didn't get bothered much after signing Kirilenko last year.
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,323
And1: 754
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#14 » by jefe » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:10 pm

Dr Aki wrote:
jefe wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:you'd need a smoking gun (ie, actual irrefutable, unsidestepable evidence)

you'd need at the very least, one of the following to connect the FAs and the heat:
- a signed contract BEFORE july 1st
- key witness testimony stating there was a verbal/signed agreement before july 1st
- one of the FAs blabbing their mouth (a confession)
- video evidence showing the heat FO and the players agents (inc. melo, if melo is involved) having a meeting with the known agenda of the meeting about capspace and contract numbers before july 1st

and so on... if you don't have one of those things, it's nigh impossible to prove


All of those are examples of direct evidence - the CBA section quoted above permits direct or circumstantial evidence.


it's a tad broad, and a little impossible to police


Not really - it's only describing what type of evidence can be used - both direct and circumstantial. If a dispute were to occur the league would be entitled to prove its case (presumably to an arbitrator or a court of law) with both direct and circumstantial evidence. The factfinder can then weigh the evidence (both direct and circumstantial) presented and make a decision to uphold or reverse the league's action.
User avatar
KI-DW-TT-AB
Veteran
Posts: 2,651
And1: 2,309
Joined: Dec 22, 2013
Location: The Bando
Contact:
       

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#15 » by KI-DW-TT-AB » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:12 pm

pylb wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:
pylb wrote:Section C disagrees.

I doubt anything happens, but the league doesn't need to prove anything.


that's the thing, what if say wade or haslem opt out, only to re-sign for more years for sig. greater than the amount owed to them.

that can be rationally explained, there's already a precedent - the spurs had the RJ contract a few years ago

That's why section C contains the almighty "including, but not limited to" words.

Really, if the league wants to do something, it can do it. Doesn't need to justify itself. It won't do so because it could get tangled in a legal mess and it would sow discord amongst owners.

Nets didn't get bothered much after signing Kirilenko last year.


Well, Dan Gilbert was suppose to file a suit against the NBA & Heat for tampering after 2010, then nobody heard anything about it again.

something something something 3 first overall picks in 4 years.
Image
#FreeGuwop
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,838
And1: 32,278
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#16 » by Dr Aki » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:18 pm

well...

1. if they had direct evidence, they wouldn't really need the circumstantial evidence
2. if all they had were everyone somehow fitting under the cap and wade and haslem signing for longer and more than what is currently owed (/w lebron and bosh and lowry/melo/whoever) then yeah, it's mightily sus, but ultimately unenforceable

the only time it's only ever been enforced was minny and joe smith and that's because joe smith couldn't keep his mouth shut
Image
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#17 » by jax98 » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:26 pm

FinNasty wrote:The players can all decide to opt out and take less assuming it is offered. And it's an easy assumption on their part that they'd get offered new contracts by the team in an attempt to bring them back. Why wouldn't the team want to bring them back? There's nothing to worry about on the players part. Why would they have any fear that the Heat wouldn't want to try to bring them back at all costs if they opted out?

So, they players get together, hash out what kinda money they all feel they would need while leaving enough to allow the team to get them more help. Opt out. And then ask for that amount the players determined when FA starts.

None of that is against the rules...


This is technically correct, but they can't present in a manner of which Miami will directly benefit off it, meaning it'd have to go something like this to be fully legal:

LeBron, Wade and Bosh and their teams review the cap thoroughly, and calculate specific salary demands that indirectly (key word right there) will leave Miami with the opportunity to have a specific amount open for other free agents.

In essence, LeBron, Wade and Bosh can't sit down with Riley and say "Well, how much does Player X want so we can adapt accordingly?" - It would have to be two separate motions independent of each other that needs to come together.

But, in reality, I'm sure there are conversations taking place that would be deemed illegal. It likely happens all over the place.
User avatar
Shuttlesworth34
Junior
Posts: 493
And1: 561
Joined: Jun 27, 2013
       

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#18 » by Shuttlesworth34 » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:28 pm

How many times are we going to have this discussion on the GB? Just lock it already. Everyone knows that pre-arranged contracts are against the CBA, but the reality is that it happens all the time anyway and nobody cares
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#19 » by NyCeEvO » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:33 pm

pylb wrote:
Dr Aki wrote:
pylb wrote:Section C disagrees.

I doubt anything happens, but the league doesn't need to prove anything.


that's the thing, what if say wade or haslem opt out, only to re-sign for more years for sig. greater than the amount owed to them.

that can be rationally explained, there's already a precedent - the spurs had the RJ contract a few years ago

That's why section C contains the almighty "including, but not limited to" words.

Really, if the league wants to do something, it can do it. Doesn't need to justify itself. It won't do so because it could get tangled in a legal mess and it would sow discord amongst owners.

Nets didn't get bothered much after signing Kirilenko last year.

The league still investigated the AK47 situation though.
trlp1712
Sophomore
Posts: 216
And1: 109
Joined: Nov 20, 2010
Location: Venezuela
         

Re: CBA Doesn't Allow Prearranged Restructured Contracts 

Post#20 » by trlp1712 » Tue Jul 1, 2014 12:40 pm

Shuttlesworth34 wrote:How many times are we going to have this discussion on the GB? Just lock it already. Everyone knows that pre-arranged contracts are against the CBA, but the reality is that it happens all the time anyway and nobody cares


Yeah, it's getting a little ridiculous (sp?) with so many discussions about the same topic. We're truly in the off-season hehe.
go Mavericks

Return to The General Board