Early Top 8 in the East projections.

ThunderUp1234 · Post #1 » by **ThunderUp1234** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:36 am

With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Wizards.
4- Raptors.
5- Pacers.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

mhd · Post #2 » by **mhd** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:37 am

ThunderUp1234 wrote:With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Pacers.
4- Raptors.
5- Wizards.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

That's impossible. Have to factor in divisions.

HoraryAstrology · Post #3 » by **HoraryAstrology** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:40 am

ThunderUp1234 wrote:With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Pacers.
4- Raptors.
5- Wizards.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

Your 8 would look like:

1. Bulls
2. Raptors
3. Wizards
4. Cavs
5. Pacers
6. Heat
7. Hawks
8. Pistons

kinghasnoequal · Post #4 » by **kinghasnoequal** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:41 am

This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.

Wolves21 · Post #5 » by **Wolves21** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:41 am

1.Bulls
2.Cavs
3.Heat
4.Raptors
5.Wizards
6.Bobcats
7.Pacers
8.Nets

qm22 · Post #6 » by **qm22** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:44 am

1. Pacers
2. Cavs
3. Heat
4. Bulls
5. Raptors
6. Hawks
7. Wizards
8. Pistons

JohnnyNightrain · Post #7 » by **JohnnyNightrain** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:48 am

JoaKING Noah wrote:
ThunderUp1234 wrote:With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Pacers.
4- Raptors.
5- Wizards.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

Your 8 would look like:

1. Bulls
2. Raptors
3. Wizards
4. Cavs
5. Pacers
6. Heat
7. Hawks
8. Pistons

Cavs could still be two seed behind Chicago. The seeding just guarantees division winners can't be lower than fourth.

Gus Fring · Post #8 » by **Gus Fring** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:49 am

Bulls
Cavs
Wizards
Pacers
Raptors
Heat
Bobcats
Hawks

miamiballer · Post #9 » by **miamiballer** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:49 am

1 bulls
2 pacers
3. Heat
4. Raptors
5. Cavs
6. Wizards
7. Hawks
8. Bobcats

samuraix · Post #10 » by **samuraix** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:51 am

mhd wrote:
ThunderUp1234 wrote:With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Pacers.
4- Raptors.
5- Wizards.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

That's impossible. Have to factor in divisions.

Not necessarily. That's only for tiebreakers. Seeds 1-4 is for division leaders and the highest non-division winner so his standings would have Pacers having a better record than the Raptors despite the Raptors winning the division.

jamesnamida · Post #11 » by **jamesnamida** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:51 am

cavs
bulls
wiz
heat
raps
indy
bobcats
hawks

catsfan · Post #12 » by **catsfan** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:54 am

dammit guys. we aren't the bobcats! we are the hornets!

mademan · Post #13 » by **mademan** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:56 am

Cavs/Bulls
Bulls/Cavs
Raptors
Wizards
Pacers
Hawks
Heat
Hornets

kdot99 · Post #14 » by **kdot99** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:57 am

samuraix wrote:
mhd wrote:
ThunderUp1234 wrote:With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Pacers.
4- Raptors.
5- Wizards.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

That's impossible. Have to factor in divisions.

Not necessarily. That's only for tiebreakers. Seeds 1-4 is for division leaders and the highest non-division winner so his standings would have Pacers having a better record than the Raptors despite the Raptors winning the division.

There's three division's and only two are represented in the 1-4 seeds in his standings. The three division winner are placed in the top 4 seeds.

EscapoTHB · Post #15 » by **EscapoTHB** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:57 am

Pacers
heat
bulls
Nets
hawks
raptors
cavs
wizards

BJGOAT3 · Post #16 » by **BJGOAT3** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:57 am

samuraix wrote:
mhd wrote:
ThunderUp1234 wrote:With FA's signing now.

Assuming Lance goes back to Indy, i got.

1- Bulls.
2- Cavs.
3- Pacers.
4- Raptors.
5- Wizards.
6- Heat.
7- Hawks.
8- Pistons.

That's impossible. Have to factor in divisions.

Not necessarily. That's only for tiebreakers. Seeds 1-4 is for division leaders and the highest non-division winner so his standings would have Pacers having a better record than the Raptors despite the Raptors winning the division.

Yes but Bulls-Cavs-Pacers are all in the same division, all 3 can't be top 4, Raptors and the winner of the other division(Wiz?) would be above Pacers in this model, while Pacers would keep the HCA against Wizards.

joseph235 · Post #17 » by **joseph235** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:00 am

kinghasnoequal wrote:This again with the Bulls? It's going to start this early eh.

Didn't you hear? Rose put on his shoes and actually tied one of them!

Liver_Pooty · Post #18 » by **Liver_Pooty** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:01 am

Stopped reading after I saw the Bobcats mentioned 3 times. That isn't our name. Keep up with things.

Troubadour · Post #19 » by **Troubadour** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:02 am

EscapoTHB wrote:Pacers
heat
bulls
Nets
hawks
raptors
cavs
wizards

The Nets got worse this off-season...how are they now better than the Raptors who added two quality rotation players in Lou Williams and James Johnson?

Lost Livingston and Pierce. Garnett is a year older. Lopez and Williams coming off of major surgeries.

Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app

Troubadour · Post #20 » by **Troubadour** » Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:03 am

Also, the number of people who don't understand how the conference rankings work is shocking

Sent from my SGH-I747M using RealGM Forums mobile app