The Warriors are better without KD

Moderators: Dirk, CoreyGallagher, magnumt, ken6199, Yuri Vaultin, BombsquadSammy, Tarik Black, Mr. E, bwgood77, Rhettmatic, Duke4life831, KF10, GimmeDat, Knickstape1214, DayofMourning, Capn'O

rcontador
Junior
Posts: 321
And1: 137
Joined: May 08, 2012

The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#1 » by rcontador » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:07 am

Every time he sits out they switch back into 2016 Warriors god mode. He comes back and they still win, but it's clunky, and upsets come easier. They'll win the title with or without him, because they have 10x the talent of anybody else... but it's time to call a spade a spade. He makes them worse.
User avatar
Tetlak
Analyst
Posts: 3,256
And1: 1,139
Joined: Aug 16, 2010

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#2 » by Tetlak » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:08 am

Absolutely not.
xfactor
Rookie
Posts: 1,020
And1: 604
Joined: May 22, 2016

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#3 » by xfactor » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:09 am

rcontador wrote:Every time he sits out they switch back into 2016 Warriors god mode. He comes back and they still win, but it's clunky, and upsets come easier. They'll win the title with or without him, because they have 10x the talent of anybody else... but it's time to call a spade a spade. He makes them worse.


Just a reminder. The 2016 'god mode' Warriors are NOT the champions.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 26,155
And1: 6,192
Joined: Jun 06, 2002
Contact:

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#4 » by 76ciology » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:09 am

..until they play the top teams in the west.
Twitter: Pjeffersonlim| S i x e r s |
OptionZero
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,366
And1: 1,002
Joined: Sep 02, 2007

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#5 » by OptionZero » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:12 am

for some reason people don't understand that the answer is short term yes long term no.

They COULD win the title without KD; the margin for error gets pretty small. KD is not only a large factor himself, he also has expandability to cover for an injury to Curry, dray, or klay.

Likewise, curry, dray and klay are good enough to cover for a KD injury

its about degree of difficulty

but whatevers, dumbasses will keep posting this garbage
SimonFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,830
And1: 988
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
   

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#6 » by SimonFish » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:14 am

yes and the cavs are better without lebron, spurs are better without kawhi.
Dwyane Wade wrote:I know one thing about Miami: It is a very loyal organization. I see what they do with their players when their players get done with the game of basketball ... I don't know about the Bulls.


Oh the irony...
Fico92
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,609
And1: 2,032
Joined: Aug 05, 2014
 

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#7 » by Fico92 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:14 am

OptionZero wrote:for some reason people don't understand that the answer is short term yes long term no.

They COULD win the title without KD; the margin for error gets pretty small. KD is not only a large factor himself, he also has expandability to cover for an injury to Curry, dray, or klay.

Likewise, curry, dray and klay are good enough to cover for a KD injury

its about degree of difficulty

but whatevers, dumbasses will keep posting this garbage


Whoa man why so mad? Relax :lol:
homecourtloss
Veteran
Posts: 2,875
And1: 2,110
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#8 » by homecourtloss » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:19 am

SimonFish wrote:yes and the cavs are better without lebron, spurs are better without kawhi.


Durant is not the Warriors' best player--Curry is.

In addition, neither the Cavs nor the Spurs have the luxury of having another top 3 type player on the roster to ameliorate for the loss of a star player.

But in any case, in a series against an elite team, the Warriors are better with Durant. The players don't know their roles as well and they curiously don't defend as well when he's in there, but against elite teams in a 7 game series, they're better with KD as he will allow them to hedge against more randomness, combat opponents' hot shooting streaks with his own, etc. They might not look as cohesive, but they will be more difficult to defeat 4 times in a seven game span.
olive_triangurl wrote:What is RPM?
rcontador
Junior
Posts: 321
And1: 137
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#9 » by rcontador » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:20 am

SimonFish wrote:yes and the cavs are better without lebron, spurs are better without kawhi.


Refresh my memory — did the Cavs without Lebron win 73 games? If so, this might be true.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 32,867
And1: 4,941
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#10 » by Mylie10 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:27 am

The Warriors are better without KD like PBJ's are better without the Jelly? Not
Parker Allen football 2015 Clayton Valley High School Freshman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvEd5ZVFRb8
jbk1234
Forum Mod - Cavs
Forum Mod - Cavs
Posts: 24,627
And1: 12,212
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
   

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#11 » by jbk1234 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:32 am

They should cut him tbh.
Image
SimonFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,830
And1: 988
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
   

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#12 » by SimonFish » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:32 am

rcontador wrote:
SimonFish wrote:yes and the cavs are better without lebron, spurs are better without kawhi.


Refresh my memory — did the Cavs without Lebron win 73 games? If so, this might be true.


xfactor wrote:Just a reminder. The 2016 'god mode' Warriors are NOT the champions.
Dwyane Wade wrote:I know one thing about Miami: It is a very loyal organization. I see what they do with their players when their players get done with the game of basketball ... I don't know about the Bulls.


Oh the irony...
linkz1993
Sophomore
Posts: 177
And1: 72
Joined: Sep 13, 2015
     

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#13 » by linkz1993 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:34 am

Kd in a lineup against Cleveland makes Irving have to guard curry or thompson, in the finals they had this dude on Barnes like 70% of the time , and you also now have to make Lebron actually guard someone ..

Oh and even better spacing for everyone to operate..
SimonFish
Head Coach
Posts: 6,830
And1: 988
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
   

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#14 » by SimonFish » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:35 am

homecourtloss wrote:
SimonFish wrote:yes and the cavs are better without lebron, spurs are better without kawhi.


Durant is not the Thunder's best player--Westbrook is.

In addition, neither the Cavs nor the Spurs have the luxury of having another top 3 type player on the roster to ameliorate for the loss of a star player.

But in any case, in a series against an elite team, the Thunder are better with Durant. The players don't know their roles as well and they curiously don't defend as well when he's in there, but against elite teams in a 7 game series, they're better with KD.

ftfy - m i doing it right?
Dwyane Wade wrote:I know one thing about Miami: It is a very loyal organization. I see what they do with their players when their players get done with the game of basketball ... I don't know about the Bulls.


Oh the irony...
SFrush
Senior
Posts: 544
And1: 315
Joined: Jan 13, 2016
       

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#15 » by SFrush » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:38 am

rcontador wrote:Every time he sits out they switch back into 2016 Warriors god mode. He comes back and they still win, but it's clunky, and upsets come easier. They'll win the title with or without him, because they have 10x the talent of anybody else... but it's time to call a spade a spade. He makes them worse.


Complete nonsense. smh
homecourtloss
Veteran
Posts: 2,875
And1: 2,110
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#16 » by homecourtloss » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:40 am

SimonFish wrote:
homecourtloss wrote:
SimonFish wrote:yes and the cavs are better without lebron, spurs are better without kawhi.


Durant is not the Thunder's best player--Westbrook is.

In addition, neither the Cavs nor the Spurs have the luxury of having another top 3 type player on the roster to ameliorate for the loss of a star player.

But in any case, in a series against an elite team, the Thunder are better with Durant. The players don't know their roles as well and they curiously don't defend as well when he's in there, but against elite teams in a 7 game series, they're better with KD.

ftfy - m i doing it right?


I thought Durant was the Thinder's best player although it was a bit of a toss up that final year.

If you ask all NBA head coaches and all NBA GMs this question: "When facing the Warriors, if you had the power to force one player to sit, whom would you take out of the game?" I'm willing to bet that over 75% of all coaches and GMs would choose to take out Curry.
olive_triangurl wrote:What is RPM?
rcontador
Junior
Posts: 321
And1: 137
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#17 » by rcontador » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:41 am

xfactor wrote:
rcontador wrote:Every time he sits out they switch back into 2016 Warriors god mode. He comes back and they still win, but it's clunky, and upsets come easier. They'll win the title with or without him, because they have 10x the talent of anybody else... but it's time to call a spade a spade. He makes them worse.


Just a reminder. The 2016 'god mode' Warriors are NOT the champions.


Steph Curry was injured in the 2016 playoffs.
MoMan24
Pro Prospect
Posts: 918
And1: 776
Joined: Mar 20, 2011

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#18 » by MoMan24 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:42 am

I don't care what anyone tells me. GSW does not need KD to get to the finals. I have seen enough at the end of the season and the game 2 blowout to know that. Now if finals LBJ shows up then they may need KD. But without KD they are in the finals with a good chance at winning it. Also with KD, Curry is never the same and things get real dicey in late game scenarios. KD is a luxury and not a necessity. To lose your most talented player and still be a true contender, just lets you know the talent edge they hold over the league. Its acutely disgusting.
User avatar
Scizzup
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,624
And1: 936
Joined: Nov 27, 2016
   

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#19 » by Scizzup » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:44 am

Curry/Klay won't shoot 12/35 for 35 points a lot but when they do vs a team like Spurs/Cavs, they are probably losing that game. Unless Lebron/Kyrie also go 9/34 for 23points from the field
User avatar
TheBullsDynasty
Senior
Posts: 667
And1: 326
Joined: Dec 24, 2011

Re: The Warriors are better without KD 

Post#20 » by TheBullsDynasty » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:49 am

There's one tiny detail that everyone seems to be forgetting. Thanks to Barnes last year, Cavs were able to put Lebron on Curry on both offense and defense.

Now that they have Durant, Lebron will need to defend Durant instead of Curry because Love and TT won't ve able to defend him for sure.
Bang.. Bang.. and Bang..

No, Deng. It's Deng!

Return to The General Board