Sixers and Celtics in serious talks about potential trade involving #1 pick

sogood · Post #21 » by **sogood** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:25 pm

Read on Twitter

Magic_Johnny12 · Post #22 » by **Magic_Johnny12** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:26 pm

This is a trade I actually like for both sides.

zronv7 · Post #23 » by **zronv7** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:26 pm

Ainge will want either Embiid or Simmons + The 3rd pick, Ainge always gets the better end of the deal

Post #24 » by **dockingsched** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:28 pm

3rd pick/2018 lakers pick for 1st pick, call it a day

GregB · Post #25 » by **GregB** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:28 pm

zronv7 wrote:Ainge will want either Embiid or Simmons + The 3rd pick, Ainge always gets the better end of the deal

I am thinking more like #3, Lakers pick, Sacramento pick or a Philly pick. I would love to get Saric but no players have been mentioned yet.

Devassa · Post #26 » by **Devassa** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:28 pm

EricAnderson wrote:
Devassa wrote:Probably Okafor and #3, right?

Nah picks too.. so I'd guess the Lakers unprotected next year and/or Kings unprotected the following year

Wow.. That's a pretty expensive price tag. I think they're probably better off just selecting whoever is left available between Fultz/Ball/Jackson but whatever... it's the same team that traded Nerlens for Justin Anderson

Cavaliers2 · Post #27 » by **Cavaliers2** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:28 pm

Fultz Simmons and Embiid could be pretty crazy if they could actually stay healthy

zronv7 · Post #28 » by **zronv7** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:28 pm

jason bourne wrote:
lamscott wrote:Ooooo. Lakers supposedly offering #2 and Julius Randle for the same pick.

What's wrong with Julius Randle? No D, but is he out of shape already?

Bennett 2.0

DowJones · Post #29 » by **DowJones** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:30 pm

If LA takes Jackson then what does Boston do? Do they take Ball even though he clearly doesn't want to go there?

Tai · Post #30 » by **Tai** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:30 pm

Read on Twitter

Must...breathe...

sogood · Post #31 » by **sogood** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:30 pm

zronv7 wrote:
jason bourne wrote:
lamscott wrote:Ooooo. Lakers supposedly offering #2 and Julius Randle for the same pick.

What's wrong with Julius Randle? No D, but is he out of shape already?

Bennett 2.0

No.

SlowPaced · Post #32 » by **SlowPaced** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:30 pm

xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:Do the 76ers really want Fultz that bad? If the plan is to have Simmons run the offense, why not just take Tatum at #3?

Planning on Simmons running the offense is no reason not to want Fultz. One playmaker is usually not enough. Not to mention Fultz is a scorer first, playmaker second and Philly desperately need a guard who can score.

sogood · Post #33 » by **sogood** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:31 pm

DowJones wrote:If LA takes Jackson then what does Boston do? Do they take Ball even though he clearly doesn't want to go there?

Read on Twitter

xxSnEaKyPxx · Post #34 » by **xxSnEaKyPxx** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:32 pm

SlowPaced wrote:
xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:Do the 76ers really want Fultz that bad? If the plan is to have Simmons run the offense, why not just take Tatum at #3?

Planning on Simmons running the offense is no reason not to want Fultz. One playmaker is usually not enough. Not to mention Fultz is a scorer first, playmaker second and Philly desperately need a guard who can score.

Thats true, but we all know Ainge is going to ask for the farm.

YogurtProducer · Post #35 » by **YogurtProducer** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:33 pm

I swear to god if Boston gets more high future picks...

SlowPaced · Post #36 » by **SlowPaced** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:34 pm

xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:
SlowPaced wrote:
xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:Do the 76ers really want Fultz that bad? If the plan is to have Simmons run the offense, why not just take Tatum at #3?

Planning on Simmons running the offense is no reason not to want Fultz. One playmaker is usually not enough. Not to mention Fultz is a scorer first, playmaker second and Philly desperately need a guard who can score.

Thats true, but we all know Ainge is going to ask for the farm.

Doubt it. #3 pick + another first rounder gets it done most likely.

I love Fultz's fit for Philly.

PhillySixers22 · Post #37 » by **PhillySixers22** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:34 pm

GregB wrote:
zronv7 wrote:Ainge will want either Embiid or Simmons + The 3rd pick, Ainge always gets the better end of the deal

I am thinking more like #3, Lakers pick, Sacramento pick or a Philly pick. I would love to get Saric but no players have been mentioned yet.

If BC gives up this much, and I'm genuinely worried that this is about what's being offered, Sixer fans are going to lose it. I would prefer Fultz over Jackson or Ball, but not at that price.

Crooked-I · Post #38 » by **Crooked-I** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:35 pm

No way Ainge does this trade without both the Lakers and Kings pick. This is the type of move that can make him look like the biggest dummy on earth, he's gonna want as many assets as possible to mitigate that risk.

Post #39 » by **dockingsched** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:36 pm

jason bourne wrote:
lamscott wrote:Ooooo. Lakers supposedly offering #2 and Julius Randle for the same pick.

What's wrong with Julius Randle? No D, but is he out of shape already?

XtremeDunkz · Post #40 » by **XtremeDunkz** » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:37 pm

Crooked-I wrote:No way Ainge does this trade without both the Lakers and Kings pick. This is the type of move that can make him look like the biggest dummy on earth, he's gonna want as many assets as possible to mitigate that risk.

lol if thats the deal I will delete my account and never come back.