Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG?

Moderators: magnumt, ken6199, BombsquadSammy, Yuri Vaultin, Tarik Black, Mr. E, bwgood77, Rhettmatic, Duke4life831, KF10, GimmeDat, Knickstape1214, DayofMourning, Capn'O, Dirk, CoreyGallagher

Better or worse?

Better
62
71%
Worse
25
29%
 
Total votes: 87

User avatar
TMoney99
Freshman
Posts: 71
And1: 62
Joined: May 04, 2016
 

Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#1 » by TMoney99 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:54 pm

Do they do better or worse and why?
Patches Perry
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 3,290
Joined: May 11, 2016

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#2 » by Patches Perry » Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:59 pm

About the same. Curry draws more defensive attention, but Nash's vision, ability to maestro an offense and create for others with the ball in his hands really made those teams go. I don't know that Curry could do those things to the same extent, although like I said, he'd make up for it in other ways.
Tinseltown
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,326
And1: 1,880
Joined: Aug 19, 2013
 

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#3 » by Tinseltown » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:04 pm

A lot beter because they'd shoot a lot more 3s. In the modern NBA the 2005 Suns would be towards the bottom of the league in terms of 3 point attempts at only 24 a game. Throw Steph Curry on that roster and they can up that to 30+. No team in 2005 would be prepared to handle an offense shooting 30-40 3s a game at a high percentage.
NormanDale
Pro Prospect
Posts: 855
And1: 267
Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#4 » by NormanDale » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:10 am

Better because Curry is better than Nash.
Hear you tell it, man I'm fallin/Well somebody must have caught him/Cause every fourth quarter/I like to Mike Jordan 'em.

"I think you'll find that these are the exact same dimensions as our gym back at Hickory."
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 88,466
And1: 32,551
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Bertrob
 

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#5 » by Dupp » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:12 am

Worse. Nash is a better playmaker and their offense was fine. They needed defense.
Image
User avatar
Rasho is god
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,283
And1: 621
Joined: Feb 02, 2010
Location: Kamloops
 

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#6 » by Rasho is god » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:17 am

what about 2005 Nash playing in 2017 era with that team. He used to shoot a lot of midrange jumpers that he wouldn't know.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 32,771
And1: 4,876
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#7 » by Mylie10 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:27 am

Steph and Booker would be cool. They would be better because Steph instantly creates space on the floor for everyone he plays with. It's not a mere coincidence.
Parker Allen football 2015 Clayton Valley High School Freshman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvEd5ZVFRb8
User avatar
grave
Starter
Posts: 2,184
And1: 85
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Location: Warsaw/Poland

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#8 » by grave » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:29 am

Nash was insane passer, I would say worse
User avatar
Mujahydeen
Senior
Posts: 556
And1: 389
Joined: Nov 20, 2009

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#9 » by Mujahydeen » Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:56 am

These Suns teams had offense as efficient as today's Warriors, but it was centered on Nash's ability to orchestrate and create for others. I think they would be worse but it's only a matter of fit, as Curry wouldnt be able to replicate that, not him being a lesser player.
User avatar
GrandTheftRondo
Analyst
Posts: 3,637
And1: 581
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#10 » by GrandTheftRondo » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:02 am

Nash was a better passer, but I think some here are really underestimating Curry's passing ability. He isn't just a Westbrook type passer. He's very good at passing with either hand, drawing the defence like Nash did, throwing flashy passes etc.

Nash didn't turn the ball over as much as Curry did in 2004-05 but his usage rate wasn't as high as Curry's.

Curry is still a very good passer, and right as he has matured as a player and more specifically a passer Kerr came and implemented an offence that leads to a lot more hockey assists from Steph rather than actual assists.

Steph's scoring is also far better than Nash's and defensively he's better than Nash.

Steph makes that team better.
DarthTeufel
Ballboy
Posts: 10
And1: 33
Joined: Mar 31, 2017

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#11 » by DarthTeufel » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:07 am

Worse

Do people remember that same Suns team with Marbury instead of Nash went 29-53 the previous year with the same team?

Nash's all-time great playmaking and passing was EVERYTHING for that team. Even when they missed Amare the next year they hardly missed a beat.

And people forget Nash was one of the greatest shooters ever in his own right. If he played today, he would be averaging in the 20s for sure and taking at least twice as many threes.
LakersLegacy
Starter
Posts: 2,378
And1: 1,053
Joined: Apr 27, 2015
   

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#13 » by LakersLegacy » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:18 am

Nash is one of my all time favs but I can't even imagine what DAntonie would do for Curry

We know what he did for
Nash
Lin
Harden
60odbye Kobe
DaleyBlind
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,618
And1: 1,101
Joined: Oct 11, 2014
Location: Sydney
     

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#14 » by DaleyBlind » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:39 am

Worse, The offense relied on Nash's play-making almost exclusively.
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 32,789
And1: 4,938
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
Location: Brought to you by the Splash Fam
   

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#15 » by Coxy » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:47 am

Better.
chyau.00
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,854
And1: 390
Joined: Nov 05, 2007

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#16 » by chyau.00 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:49 am

Much better.

Not only is curry better than nash, he is also much younger than nash was.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 25,928
And1: 6,055
Joined: Jun 06, 2002
Contact:

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#17 » by 76ciology » Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:51 am

Well LeBron with the Bulls team would have been better
Twitter: Pjeffersonlim| S i x e r s |
MoMan24
Pro Prospect
Posts: 910
And1: 755
Joined: Mar 20, 2011

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#18 » by MoMan24 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:07 am

Curry is no where near the passer Nash was. Nash is a top 3 passer ever at worst. That teams problem was not offense at all. Nash spoon feed his teams. I am being literal here. They may as well have worn bibs. Every single player during that time who left the suns never had close to the production they had with Nash. Joe Johnson is the exception since he left with one year with Nash having his best season to that point and his most efficient of his career and was a young player but never had as much team success. Best case is they stay even because you take away all time great play making for all time great shooter. Defense was their issue and Curry does not help with that.
The Bronx
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 105
Joined: Mar 27, 2017

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#19 » by The Bronx » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:29 pm

TMoney99 wrote:Do they do better or worse and why?


Worse, Curry is no where the distributor Nash was.

Nash - legendary passer and shooter

Curry - legendary shooter
User avatar
Lakerfan17
General Manager
Posts: 8,693
And1: 1,633
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: SoCal

Re: Do you think the 2005 Suns would do better or worse with Steph Curry at PG? 

Post#20 » by Lakerfan17 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:51 pm

The gap between their shooting/scoring is a hell of a lot smaller than their passing.
"For Kobe, at his age, my oh my," he said. "They talk about Jordan, but this kid is so gifted, it's unbelievable." - Oscar Robertson
http://bearcatnews.com/wherenow/bio/1

Return to The General Board