RealGM

Gus McCrae wrote:

fart wrote:Laker fans in this thread are blowing my mind. You would rather lose Paul George than have to give up a late pick or two along with a young player that looks to be an average NBA starter at best? Pass the pipe..

Been explained to you a few times. Think it's a comprehension issue at this point

Well they are wrong it will be evident to them when the Lakers end up trading for him this summer instead of signing him as a free agent.

Revived wrote:

chrisab123 wrote:Absolutely nothing is for sure. But its also been leaked out that he wants to win more than anything. Boston would be able to give him a better shot at that plus more money if they can surround him with a max guy like Griffin or Hayward.

That part is obviously not true or else he wouldn't want to be joining a team that's been among the 5 worst in the league for the last several years.

He just wants to play close to home, play in a big market which can land him endorsements all while being "the man".

Similar to Melo when he wanted to go to the Knicks.

Or he is trying to tank his value so a good team guts themselves as little as possible to get him


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

mattstermh wrote:If PG goes to the Lakers, F LeBron, F the NBA and F them all. Ruined

Where do u want him to go? Lol

fart wrote:

Gus McCrae wrote:

fart wrote:Laker fans in this thread are blowing my mind. You would rather lose Paul George than have to give up a late pick or two along with a young player that looks to be an average NBA starter at best? Pass the pipe..

Been explained to you a few times. Think it's a comprehension issue at this point

Well they are wrong it will be evident to them when the Lakers end up trading for him this summer instead of signing him as a free agent.

Trading two firsts and Russell? You're calling that?

Boggles the​ mind why anyone thinks the Lakers want to become the new Indiana

Warchant wrote:

mattstermh wrote:If PG goes to the Lakers, F LeBron, F the NBA and F them all. Ruined

Where do u want him to go? Lol

I meant the Cavs

mattstermh wrote:If PG goes to the Lakers, F LeBron, F the NBA and F them all. Ruined

I hope you forgot green font.

Gus McCrae wrote:

fart wrote:

Gus McCrae wrote:Been explained to you a few times. Think it's a comprehension issue at this point

Well they are wrong it will be evident to them when the Lakers end up trading for him this summer instead of signing him as a free agent.

Trading two firsts and Russell? You're calling that?

Picks and a young prospect will be going out, not necessarily Russell. Book it.

I'm not sure how Lebron would feel about PG13. Is he better than Love? Yes.

However, this would force Lebron to play PF full time.

Dr Aki wrote:Boggles the​ mind why anyone thinks the Lakers want to become the new Indiana

What I don't understand is that you do not have your first next year anyway, so why do you want to suck? Whether you are the worst team in the league or the 15th worst, it wont affect your future.

You give up some firsts after that, they will be mid-first rounders with George on the team. Not a big deal.

I think the difference in opinion comes with DiAngelo. I just don't see star. I see inefficient sixth man. If you see star, I could see why you are protective of trading him.

Honestly, the Cavs would be better off trading Kyrie for George. Kyrie has a big reputation, and I know that the Cavs fans love him, but in reality, the guy just isn't that great of a player...his impact overall is pretty low, and I think Love at the end of the day is still the better player and is still more useful for the Cavs.

But since that's never gonna happen, the Cavs will probably have to trade Love.

Mind_Odyssey wrote:I'm not sure how Lebron would feel about PG13. Is he better than Love? Yes.

However, this would force Lebron to play PF full time.

Lebron would move to PF for Melo and he's not half the player George is


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Jkam31 wrote:

Mind_Odyssey wrote:I'm not sure how Lebron would feel about PG13. Is he better than Love? Yes.

However, this would force Lebron to play PF full time.

Lebron would move to PF for Melo and he's not half the player George is


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Melo isnt half the player PG is? LOL!!!!!!!

Mind_Odyssey wrote:I'm not sure how Lebron would feel about PG13. Is he better than Love? Yes.

However, this would force Lebron to play PF full time.

In the regular season and playoffs Lebron could play whatever position he wanted and they'd make the finals. In the finals he'd get to guard Draymond and not have to deal with KD. Ideal situation for him really.

heatwillbeback wrote:

Dr Aki wrote:Boggles the​ mind why anyone thinks the Lakers want to become the new Indiana

What I don't understand is that you do not have your first next year anyway, so why do you want to suck? Whether you are the worst team in the league or the 15th worst, it wont affect your future.

You give up some firsts after that, they will be mid-first rounders with George on the team. Not a big deal.

I think the difference in opinion comes with DiAngelo. I just don't see star. I see inefficient sixth man. If you see star, I could see why you are protective of trading him.

Lol trade the farm for Paul George just to become a treadmill team, all to minimise the loss of a 1st rounder.

All for someone we could get for nothing in a year

Warchant wrote:

Asif16 wrote:

Warchant wrote:I can see it know...Shumpert, Frye and future 1st round pick(2021) for PG...thats how teams roll when they trade w the Cavs

Crazy to me how a team with little to no capspace and young assets can acquire a Superstar of George's calibre or just impaxtful players in general.

That korver trade blew my mind. Like Atlanta seriously couldnt find a better offer from essentially ANY other team?

Exactly...its beyond comical but teams just love to see LB play in the finals...whats even more funny is these teams are in the East lol

It's exactly how I felt with the Lakers a few years back. Pau Gasol, Steve Nash, Dwight Howard, Chris Paul, why did teams keep gifting the Lakers their stars?

Dr Aki wrote:

heatwillbeback wrote:

Dr Aki wrote:Boggles the​ mind why anyone thinks the Lakers want to become the new Indiana

What I don't understand is that you do not have your first next year anyway, so why do you want to suck? Whether you are the worst team in the league or the 15th worst, it wont affect your future.

You give up some firsts after that, they will be mid-first rounders with George on the team. Not a big deal.

I think the difference in opinion comes with DiAngelo. I just don't see star. I see inefficient sixth man. If you see star, I could see why you are protective of trading him.

Lol trade the farm for Paul George just to become a treadmill team, all to minimise the loss of a 1st rounder.

Dude, you're the Lakers. You get a star, and the rest of your young players start to develop and more stars will come. You have to know your team wouldn't be done making moves or improving after they get PG13.

If the Cavs get Paul George without giving up any of the big 3 then the NBA is ruined except for 2 teams.

Effigy wrote:

Warchant wrote:

Asif16 wrote:
Crazy to me how a team with little to no capspace and young assets can acquire a Superstar of George's calibre or just impaxtful players in general.

That korver trade blew my mind. Like Atlanta seriously couldnt find a better offer from essentially ANY other team?

Exactly...its beyond comical but teams just love to see LB play in the finals...whats even more funny is these teams are in the East lol

It's exactly how I felt with the Lakers a few years back. Pau Gasol, Steve Nash, Dwight Howard, Chris Paul, why did teams keep gifting the Lakers their stars?

Maybe because they were the only team that called?

Shock Defeat wrote:If the Cavs get Paul George without giving up any of the big 3 then the NBA is ruined except for 2 teams.

Wouldn't really be any different than the past 3 years.