SerialChiller wrote:LarsV8 wrote:SerialChiller wrote:
They really should just tell him he's riding the pine all season if he stays to create some.
Except they can't really.
Ya you're probably right. It would cause problems. But a team should be able to make any player a DNP Coach's Decision at their own discretion. But I'm sure the league would step in. I just don't like how players have so much power these days...they are just team employees after all (ridiculously paid ones at that) and he'd still be getting his money. So they should be able to technically imo. The Knicks were dumb enough to give him the rare no trade clause, but honestly they should be able to play him as much or as little as they like and if he don't like it then he should open up their options to trade him or agree to a buyout.
They aren't just regular employees like any other though, they are also the product, and are the team itself, so it is quite reasonable and understandable that they would have more power than a normal employee.
Also don't see why Carmelo should be punished. Has he been somewhat difficult too? I suppose, but he was not the instigator, and like you said, they gave him the no trade, which essentially is giving him the right to be difficult about whether he moves or not. Not only that, it was Phil who was treating him as unwanted, reduced his trade value, and instead of working with him, made it an antagonistic relationship. If Phil had done it right, "hey, we want to rebuild and we won't be able to put a competitive team around you, so tell us some teams you would like to go to and let's see if we can work something out", they would have traded him by the deadline last season.
That's much different from bad mouthing a guy, then trying to force him out. So while Phil is gone and I feel for the fans, that's no sympathy for the Knicks organization here.