UcanUwill wrote:If they don't resign him, they pretty much admit the trade was a disaster. So what do they do? No win situation for my boy Karnisovas.
Overpaying him makes the trade not a disaster?
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
UcanUwill wrote:If they don't resign him, they pretty much admit the trade was a disaster. So what do they do? No win situation for my boy Karnisovas.
Scalabrine wrote:UcanUwill wrote:If they don't resign him, they pretty much admit the trade was a disaster. So what do they do? No win situation for my boy Karnisovas.
Overpaying him makes the trade not a disaster?
UcanUwill wrote:Scalabrine wrote:UcanUwill wrote:If they don't resign him, they pretty much admit the trade was a disaster. So what do they do? No win situation for my boy Karnisovas.
Overpaying him makes the trade not a disaster?
Not saying that. I am just saying they are not admitting it, committing instead.
Scalabrine wrote:The Rebel wrote:Scalabrine wrote:
I dont get the too many bigs part. Plumlee is their 3rd best big after Sap and Jokic, you dont just let him walk because you have lesser guys that also "need minutes". Let them all fight it out for minutes and hopefully you can move one of them for another point guard.
At the very least it's a tradable contract for a younger useful bigman.
Jokic/Plumlee/Arthur
Milsap/Faried/Lyles
Chandler/Hernangomez/Childress
Harris/Barton/Beasley
Murray/Mudiay/Nelson
Love that team and I hope that one of Murray or Mudiay can develop into an all-star level point guard to pair with Jokic. There strength is depth, which isn't that beneficial in the playoffs but I can definitely see that team getting to 50 wins this year if they stay healthy.
Plumlee isn't better than Faried.
You don't think so? I'll take your word for it, your a pretty solid poster (and a Nuggets fan).
I wasn't trying to imply that Faried was bad, I just think that Plumlee has a more functional skillset for the Nuggets. His +passing also allows them to operate a similar offense when Jokic isn't on the floor too, which to me is very valuable. Look at the Cavs for example, their entire offense is based around LeBron and they really struggle when he's not on the court because the offense changes and everyone takes on a different role for the 12-14 minutes he's not playing. I also think that having another bigman is important for them, Faried and Arthur are both really small ball 5's.
From a non-Nuggets fan perspective, when all players are healthy, I think minute distribution will shake out something like this:
Jokic(28)/Plumlee(20)
Milsap(31)/Faried(14)/Jokic(3)
Chandler(32)/Barton(10)/Hernangomez(6)
Harris(34)/Barton(14)
Murray(26)/Mudiay(16)/Nelson(6)
You may see Murray slide to the 2, Chandler play some 4, Faried and Sap play some 5 depending on matchups. Maybe Mudiay or Nelson are completely out of the rotation, Hernangomez might not get much run either and Arthur will probably see the court too. Thats an 11 man rotation that could easily be cut down to 9 at full strength.
Is that way off?
miula wrote:Willie Reed only gets minimum deal...and he is better than Plumlee...
no dice wrote:He is the best plumlees out there. His game is exciting and unorthodox and can take it to the next level with the fast pace the nuggets play in