G35 wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
GS won 73 games before Durant joined them. The Heat were eliminated in the first round, in the East, before LBJ joined them. The Cavs were a lottery team. The situations aren't comparable and no amount of false comparisons will change that.
So if Chris Bosh wasn't going to sign with Heat in 2010, do you think Lebron will still run to South Beach and play with Wade?
Also, if PG/Westbrook/Lebron do sign with the Lakers next year and then trade Lonzo Ball for some established star, are they not stacking the deck? Or are they a lottery team that Lebron single handily turned around?
How do we know what any one of them were going to do? It is obvious the three of them colluded to go to Miami to stack the deck in their favor. It doesn't matter about the what if because that is what happened.
Also, I do not want Lebron coming to LA. Period. I don't want them to trade Lonzo Ball. I'm not a fan of these...basically get rich quick pyramid schemes...I would rather the Lakers build their team organically like the Warriors did. It has a better chance of long term success...as you can see with these Lebron built teams they have a window of 3-4 years and they fall apart.
Also, I don't know why people keep bringing up the 73 win Warriors...as if that means anything...when you don't win the whole thing your win total doesn't mean much either. The Warriors last year won 67 games but all CLE fans want to say is, "Durant joined a 73 win team." Well it didn't help them win any more regular season games now did it. All that matters is if you take home the ring at the end.
People want it so easy nowadays, no one wants to build anything......
+1. I've tired to emphasize the bolded above, and it is astounding the lack of collective comprehension regarding this simple fact.