Post#15 » by hookshot199 » Tue May 1, 2018 1:42 pm
I posted the following yesterday and believe, from Philly's standpoint, it is just as relevant today as yesterday. You can't do anything when Baynes, Ojeleye and Larkin make more 3-balls than Redick, Belinelli, Saric, Covington and Ilyasova combined and when Redick Belinelli, Saric, Covington and Ilyasova shoot only 15% from the 3-point line (3 for 20).
But Brown has to move the C's shooters off the 3-point line. Otherwise, the series is over.
Secondly, Redick should defend Smart and not Tatum. How dumb!!!
I normally don't put too much credence in Shaq's insights, but I believe "rust" was a factor. I believe the Celtics were hot. I believe the Sixers let the Celtics dictate the tempo of the game. I also believe the Sixers didn't adjust to the "matchup problems" Barkley alluded to. I believe the Sixers may need to give TJ McConnell more minutes.
So, as things stand: Apart from the Celtics making 49% of their 3-point shots, 3-point shots accounted for 44% of points scored. In the Milwaukee series, 3-point shots accounted for 30% of points scored.
Yesterday I posted:
The Sixers need to keep Horford, Tatum and Rozier (and Morris off the bench) off the three-point line and pack it in for everybody else. Don't put Embiid on Horford. Put him on Baynes, Monroe and/or Ojeleye - which means he can play a one-man zone.
When Brown comes back (assuming he doesn't play tonight) they'll have to mix things up a bit. The Celtics can't win the series if we deny them open looks from the three-part line. And Horford, Brown and Tatum are not super-quick (Rozier is, but he's short), so there's no reason we shouldn't be able to defend the line much better than the Bucks.
Postseason 3-point average: Rozier (.382), Horford (.432), Brown (.378), Morris (.455) and Tatum (.308). Tatum, though down in the playoffs, shot at an impressive .434 clip during the season.
Thirty percent of Celtics playoff points were 3-balls.