Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era.

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

Agree or disagree?

Agree.
67
52%
Disagree.
63
48%
 
Total votes: 130

JJ_PR
Analyst
Posts: 3,328
And1: 2,791
Joined: Mar 19, 2015
   

Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#1 » by JJ_PR » Sat May 26, 2018 2:53 am

This thread isn't intended to undermine what the Spurs achieved during that span - 5 titles is a heck of an accomplishment.

What people fail to mention is that Duncan carried the Spurs his whole career. From the moment he was drafted, the Spurs were instantly contenders.

Something that goes unnoticed is his supporting cast. The second best teammate he ever had was Manu Ginobili! David Robinson was well past his prime.

I understand the argument that they had a goat coach, but Popovich is just that... a coach. He's no magician that can magically help the Spurs get W's. His players need to step it up.

Tony Parker? A decent but not elite athlete, good team defender but not great either.

There's a reason Duncan is on many people's top 10. He was not flashy, but he was so good.

If I had to choose between him and Shaq in their primes, give me Tim Duncan.

He's the most underrated player of his generation, maybe all generations.
Gus Fring
Pro Prospect
Posts: 913
And1: 868
Joined: Dec 16, 2013

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#2 » by Gus Fring » Sat May 26, 2018 3:00 am

Duncan's peak is definitely underrated. It's always "I'll take X player's peak but Duncan's longevity" when there really isn't many players who peaked higher than Duncan. He doesn't have insane stats, but when you dig deep, especially in the playoffs, he blows other top 20 guys out of the water in terms of impact stats.
Baseline Runner
Analyst
Posts: 3,305
And1: 1,067
Joined: Aug 11, 2004
       

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#3 » by Baseline Runner » Sat May 26, 2018 3:00 am

Come on man, everyone knows Tim Duncan was great but he also always had an excellent supporting cast. Manu and Tony are two hall of famers. About 6 years ago Tony was even in discussion for MVP talk on these forums. He also had David Robinson and Kwahi Leonard at different points of his career. He wouldn't have won a championship without David or Kwahi on those two teams.
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,114
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#4 » by Kabookalu » Sat May 26, 2018 3:01 am

Agreed overall, but Tony Parker during his prime was the best dribble penetrator I've ever seen. This man's finishing ability was on another level. Manu is better than him but Parker is a fantastic 3rd option.

And he absolutely was an elite athlete. He was one of the fastest players in the league during his team and his body control was up there with the best.
Read on Twitter
User avatar
Goudelock
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,286
And1: 20,866
Joined: Jan 27, 2015
Location: College of Charleston
 

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#5 » by Goudelock » Sat May 26, 2018 3:02 am

Shout out to Derek Fisher for preventing what could've been a 3peat in only 0.4 seconds.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,136
And1: 8,909
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#6 » by iamworthy » Sat May 26, 2018 3:02 am

I love it when people down play the supporting cast to pump up the super star :roll: . Also, Im pretty sure Duncan is recognized as the GOAT PF so I don't know how he's underrated.
Image
JJ_PR
Analyst
Posts: 3,328
And1: 2,791
Joined: Mar 19, 2015
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#7 » by JJ_PR » Sat May 26, 2018 3:04 am

iamworthy wrote:I love it when people down play the supporting cast to pump up the super star :roll: . Also, Im pretty sure Duncan is recognized as the GOAT PF so I don't know how he's underrated.


Put prime Tony Parker & Manu on other teams. How do they fare? They were a product of the Spurs system, the Tim Duncan system to be precise.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 16,664
And1: 6,311
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#8 » by DirtyDez » Sat May 26, 2018 3:07 am

There’s a better argument they should’ve won less.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 16,799
And1: 17,071
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#9 » by MrBigShot » Sat May 26, 2018 3:08 am

Eh Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili during their primes is a pretty damn nice supporting cast. They were not a product of any system; the Spurs did an excellent job developing them but in their primes they'd be all star caliber players on any team.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
Luigi
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 3,590
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
 

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#10 » by Luigi » Sat May 26, 2018 3:10 am

They should've defended at least one.
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,991
And1: 14,437
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#11 » by Cactus Jack » Sat May 26, 2018 3:11 am

Should've
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
JJ_PR
Analyst
Posts: 3,328
And1: 2,791
Joined: Mar 19, 2015
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#12 » by JJ_PR » Sat May 26, 2018 3:13 am

Cactus Jack wrote:Should've


They should've, but Duncan's supporting cast was overrated imo.
User avatar
goodboy
RealGM
Posts: 46,493
And1: 185,289
Joined: Aug 07, 2014
Location: disposal japanese worker
 

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#13 » by goodboy » Sat May 26, 2018 3:15 am

AGreed
Bright
User avatar
Dr_Heat
RealGM
Posts: 21,527
And1: 96,866
Joined: Feb 27, 2015
Location: Bustelo coffee bar
         

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#14 » by Dr_Heat » Sat May 26, 2018 3:16 am

Timothy Theodore Duncan
Dr_Heat wrote: Oof
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,991
And1: 14,437
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#15 » by Cactus Jack » Sat May 26, 2018 3:17 am

JJ_PR wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Should've


They should've, but Duncan's supporting cast was overrated imo.

2004 & 2013 standout.

If Fisher doesn't make that shot (.04), the Spurs are in the Finals that year. I'm not sure they get by Detroit tho.

2013 they should've won.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
mischievous
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 3,482
Joined: Apr 18, 2015

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#16 » by mischievous » Sat May 26, 2018 3:18 am

JJ_PR wrote:What people fail to mention is that Duncan carried the Spurs his whole career.
.

This is total nonsense. Outside of maybe 2-3 seasons it was never a carry job. And his last season he was a role player.
JJ_PR
Analyst
Posts: 3,328
And1: 2,791
Joined: Mar 19, 2015
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#17 » by JJ_PR » Sat May 26, 2018 3:20 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
JJ_PR wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Should've


They should've, but Duncan's supporting cast was overrated imo.

2004 & 2013 standout.

If Fisher doesn't make that shot (.04), the Spurs are in the Finals that year. I'm not sure they get by Detroit tho.

2013 was a given.


They beat Detroit just one year later. So yeah, they would've won in '04 pretty easily.
Yoshun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,349
And1: 4,718
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
       

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#18 » by Yoshun » Sat May 26, 2018 3:21 am

I don't see Duncan as underrated at all. Most people consider him the best PF ever and a top 2 to 3 player of his time. That's on the money.

That said, he could have had better teammates, obviously. Pair him up with a top wing player and he definitely gets more rings.

It is important to recognize however, most people consider Manu a HOF. He had great role players like Bowen and Horry. Tony Parker was a very efficient, smart PG. His supporting cast wasn't like Shaq's or MJ's, but it was very good.
In SVG We Trust
Starter
Posts: 2,016
And1: 1,399
Joined: Mar 14, 2016
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#19 » by In SVG We Trust » Sat May 26, 2018 3:36 am

Duncan is a Top-5 All-Time player if you really have some basketball knowledge
JJ_PR
Analyst
Posts: 3,328
And1: 2,791
Joined: Mar 19, 2015
   

Re: Spurs could've won more titles in the Tim Duncan era. 

Post#20 » by JJ_PR » Sat May 26, 2018 3:39 am

Yoshun wrote:I don't see Duncan as underrated at all. Most people consider him the best PF ever and a top 2 to 3 player of his time. That's on the money.

That said, he could have had better teammates, obviously. Pair him up with a top wing player and he definitely gets more rings.

It is important to recognize however, most people consider Manu a HOF. He had great role players like Bowen and Horry. Tony Parker was a very efficient, smart PG. His supporting cast wasn't like Shaq's or MJ's, but it was very good.


The best SF he ever played with before Kawhi - Richard Jefferson.

Imagine him paired up with someone like prime Scottie Pippen. That's some 60's Celtics dynasty type of sh*t.

Return to The General Board