Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland?

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

Buckeye-NBAFan
General Manager
Posts: 7,977
And1: 4,537
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#21 » by Buckeye-NBAFan » Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:31 pm

Coachcavplaya23 wrote:
Frank Dux wrote:Do we really have to have this thread every day?

Outside of Kevin Love that Cavs roster was awful.


The cavs would still beat the Lakers any day.


Do the Cavs have to win 35 games next year and the Lakers less than 50 to prove that?
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 29,280
And1: 28,258
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#22 » by mademan » Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:32 pm

They may not be as good offensively, but thats a top 10 defense, imo. Ball-KCP-Ingram is one of the best 1-2-3 defensive combos, with Hart, another strong defender, coming off the bench. If they can rebound collectively (will be a problem) i think theyll be signficantly better than the Cavs. There were a lot of scrubs on that team and they were, for a while, the worst defensive team in basketball
User avatar
NPZ
Analyst
Posts: 3,541
And1: 2,505
Joined: Aug 27, 2017
Location: ^^ Anthony Peeler over Benoit Benjamin, 92/93
 

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#23 » by NPZ » Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:34 pm

Frank Dux wrote:
Coachcavplaya23 wrote:
Frank Dux wrote:Do we really have to have this thread every day?

Outside of Kevin Love that Cavs roster was awful.


The cavs would still beat the Lakers any day.



Yeah I don't know about that. Love with a supporting cast of Calderon, Clarkson, Nance, Tristian Thompson, and J.R. Smith is probably a bottom two team.


Lakers beat em from opening tap at Staples. Closer game at Cavs. 1-1. I know outside observers may think one thing, but I'll take what we have over that lineup any day of the week. Yuck. What I'd rather do is switch conferences than teammates.
NPZ's Definitive Magic Johnson highlight reel

49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 72, 80, 82, 85, 87, 88, 00, 01, 02, 09, 10, 20
BAMAFREAK
Pro Prospect
Posts: 999
And1: 1,370
Joined: Feb 27, 2017
   

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#24 » by BAMAFREAK » Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:34 pm

LakersDynasty14 wrote:LeBron’s supporting cast is miles above the scrubs he had in Cleveland.

Ball is a straight stud, best passer and floor general in the NBA. For the first time in his career LeBron actually has a teammate who will make HIM better.

Kuzma and Ingram are both better than anyone he had on Cleveland as well.

They also have a lockdown wing defender in KCP and they just signed one of the all time great playoff performers in Rondo and stole the starting C from the Warriors championship team.

This is by far the best supporting cast LeBron has ever had, and it’s only looking to improve from here.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums



Haha I needed that. That is good stuff my man
Gerald3Wallace
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,794
And1: 99
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Location: cali baby

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#25 » by Gerald3Wallace » Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:41 pm

Lakers won 35 games last year.... I don’t think Cavs with Love would even sniff that. That’s how bad that Cavs team was.

Defensively the lakers team is a lot more versatile with Zo, Ingram, and KCP on the wings. Then you got Rondo, Hart and Stevenson.
They are clearly better.
ButCanMarkDunk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 849
Joined: Jan 27, 2018
     

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#26 » by ButCanMarkDunk » Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:42 pm

Its not even close. If the Lakers are projected to win 50 in the West, they would win 60+ in the East.
Gorilla Warfare wrote:If you think about it though, when it comes to the traditional SG position (Devin Booker) is top 5 in the NBA. I would only put him behind Harden, Thompson, Butler, and DeRozan.
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,012
And1: 6,515
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#27 » by THE J0KER » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:02 am

WORSE, BUT BETTER!

In 80%+ cases NBA players playing better bball at 21y than at 20y (Ball and Ingram case), and also in 80%+ of cases as 23y old sophomores they playing better than a year before as rookies (Kuzma and Hart). And Ball, Ingram, Kuzma, and Hart are crucial in whole this story.

Cleveland playoff 2018 team without LBJ is slightly better than the current group of LA players at the end of the last regular season (because of the exit of Randle, Lopez, Thomas), but if we add projected improvement of these 4 crucial players which I mentioned (+presence of Rondo and mysterious center which still not sign), for 2019 playoff LAL2019 supporting cast will be stronger than CLE2018 supporting cast, despite there is nobody so good as Kevin Love is.

So LAL18<CLE18<LAL19, because of LAL18<<LAL19 after at least three out of four youngsters (Ball, Ingram, Kuzma, Hart) significantly improve during 2018-19 season.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 19,449
And1: 10,253
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#28 » by Catchall » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:06 am

LakersDynasty14 wrote:LeBron’s supporting cast is miles above the scrubs he had in Cleveland.

Ball is a straight stud, best passer and floor general in the NBA. For the first time in his career LeBron actually has a teammate who will make HIM better.

Kuzma and Ingram are both better than anyone he had on Cleveland as well.

They also have a lockdown wing defender in KCP and they just signed one of the all time great playoff performers in Rondo and stole the starting C from the Warriors championship team.

This is by far the best supporting cast LeBron has ever had, and it’s only looking to improve from.


Fixed for you.
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
Greyhound
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,815
And1: 2,722
Joined: Jul 15, 2002
Location: Earth

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#29 » by Greyhound » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:07 am

Depends on what type of defensive team the Lakers turn out to be.

Love is great on offense but that is mitigated by the fact that teams view him as a bullseye on defense.

The Lakers will not be a better offensive team then last season's Cavaliers however, if the Lakers can field a starting unit without a hole in need of hiding (or covering), they could be a lot better defensively.

If they can be a top defensive team that forces deflections and runs, they can be a better overall team than last season's Cavaliers.
Don't believe the hype...
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 19,449
And1: 10,253
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#30 » by Catchall » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:13 am

It depends how Kuzma and Ingram step up offensively. There's also the question of interior defense and rebounding to go along with shooting/floor spacing.

Also, fwiw the best player on last year's 35-win Lakers was Julius Randle.
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
ISayshowmee
Veteran
Posts: 2,954
And1: 1,696
Joined: Feb 27, 2017

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#31 » by ISayshowmee » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:14 am

Coachcavplaya23 wrote:
Frank Dux wrote:Do we really have to have this thread every day?

Outside of Kevin Love that Cavs roster was awful.


The cavs would still beat the Lakers any day.


Nah...JR will find a way to give the Lakers the W :)
NBAFan93
RealGM
Posts: 19,792
And1: 14,221
Joined: Dec 04, 2016

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#32 » by NBAFan93 » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:15 am

Catchall wrote:
LakersDynasty14 wrote:LeBron’s supporting cast is miles above the scrubs he had in Cleveland.

Ball is a straight stud, best passer and floor general in the NBA. For the first time in his career LeBron actually has a teammate who will make HIM better.

Kuzma and Ingram are both better than anyone he had on Cleveland as well.

They also have a lockdown wing defender in KCP and they just signed one of the all time great playoff performers in Rondo and stole the starting C from the Warriors championship team.

This is by far the best supporting cast LeBron has ever had, and it’s only looking to improve from here.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


This post is unreal, top to bottom.


Between these types of posts and the ones that say the Spurs should trade Kawhi for Deng + whichever one of those still not ready for primetime young LAL players that they feel is the worst at the moment, I’m about done w/ any thread related to Lakers. It appears some of their fans don’t watch the games of any other teams - just all Laker hype all the time.
jswede
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 1,840
Joined: May 11, 2015
Location: South Florida
   

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#33 » by jswede » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:16 am

LakersDynasty14 wrote:LeBron’s supporting cast is miles above the scrubs he had in Cleveland.

Ball is a straight stud, best passer and floor general in the NBA. For the first time in his career LeBron actually has a teammate who will make HIM better.

Kuzma and Ingram are both better than anyone he had on Cleveland as well.

They also have a lockdown wing defender in KCP and they just signed one of the all time great playoff performers in Rondo and stole the starting C from the Warriors championship team.

This is by far the best supporting cast LeBron has ever had, and it’s only looking to improve from here.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


When did you start watching basketball?
ChartFiction
Starter
Posts: 2,119
And1: 2,768
Joined: Mar 10, 2012

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#34 » by ChartFiction » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:23 am

It's pretty much the same, if not worse. Depends on how much the young guys improve.

it's just his Cleveland supporting cast already had their reputation trashed. Once the supporting cast on the Lakers gets trashed when they lose a significant amount of games, it'll be more clear that it's the same or worse.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 19,449
And1: 10,253
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#35 » by Catchall » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:45 am

Catchall wrote:
LakersDynasty14 wrote:[LeBron’s supporting cast is miles above the scrubs he had in Cleveland.

Ball is a straight stud, best passer and floor general in the NBA. For the first time in his career LeBron actually has a teammate who will make HIM better.

Kuzma and Ingram are both better than anyone he had on Cleveland as well.

They also have a lockdown wing defender in KCP and they just signed one of the all time great playoff performers in Rondo and stole the starting C from the Warriors championship team.

This is by far the best supporting cast LeBron has ever had, and it’s only looking to improve from.


Fixed for you.
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
Karate Diop
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 9,831
Joined: May 19, 2017
 

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#36 » by Karate Diop » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:48 am

Mentally I think they're a notch or two below, but they're better (slightly) by virtue of their youth and energy...
User avatar
levon
RealGM
Posts: 14,797
And1: 23,188
Joined: Aug 04, 2017

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#37 » by levon » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:50 am

sicknastydunker wrote:Are the Lakers even better than Cleveland was last year? I don't really see it. Cleveland at least had Kevin Love. Who's LA's second best player? Kyle Kuzma? Kentavious Caldwell-Pope?

And LeGM bringing in Rondo, Lance and McGee? really? Those are 3 horrible players.

https://twitter.com/JacobEGoldstein/

This guy's model has LA as barely making the 8th seed

You're not encouraging any discussion, just inflamed responses from all sides. Seems like you already know what you want to hear. Thanks for the not-so-subtle trolljob.
LivingLegend
Head Coach
Posts: 6,990
And1: 7,745
Joined: Jul 30, 2015

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#38 » by LivingLegend » Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:56 am

Clevelands roster was entirely hand picked to fit LeBrons play style. From Korver, JR and even Love. They all fit so well with what he looks to do on offense. The Lakers seemed to go out and do the exact opposite and surround him with a bunch of defenders and non shooters.

It can work, maybe. But Ive watched LB long enough to know you need shooters around him to maximize what he can do on offense. Im sure it sounds all good and dandy right now but when the Lakers go 5-24 from three and they start dropping games because of it, Im interested to see what people will say.
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 20,263
And1: 18,416
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#39 » by TheGOATRises007 » Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:16 am

No, not at the moment.

This is the worst supporting cast Lebron has had in almost a decade(keyword: at the moment).

Ingram, Lonzo, Kuzma could improve, but I doubt they improve much.
lakerz12
Head Coach
Posts: 7,377
And1: 8,899
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Contact:
     

Re: Is Lebron's supporting cast better than it was in Cleveland? 

Post#40 » by lakerz12 » Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:28 am

Karate Diop wrote:Mentally I think they're a notch or two below, but they're better (slightly) by virtue of their youth and energy...


Care to elaborate?

You're talking about a group that started J.R. Smith...

Love seems shaky. Hood capitulated in the playoffs. Who's the mental juggernaut over there? Tristan Thompson?

Lebron even hinted at "needing the right minds" in a press conference.

Rondo and Ball are better basketball minds than anyone on the Cavs. And how are Ingram, Kuzma, Hart, etc. any worse than the Cav guys?

Return to The General Board