Knicks big 3 vs GS big 3

Shock Defeat · Post #1 » by **Shock Defeat** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:03 pm

Is it just me or would the potential Knicks big 3 be way better than the warriors?

KD > Curry
Kyrie > KLay
AD > Dray

Knicks could be championship favorites next year. Just add a bunch of ring chasing vets.

hongdayuan · Post #2 » by **hongdayuan** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:04 pm

Rockets fans are this bored?

Luigi · Post #3 » by **Luigi** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:05 pm

Individually, you are right. But the Warriors fit together way too well.

Also, Warriors currently have their 3 (maybe 4 if they keep KD). NY's big 3 don't exist yet.

Post #4 » by **infinite11285** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:08 pm

Who’s on the rest of the roster with KD, AD, and KI? Is there any cap left?

knicks512 · Post #5 » by **knicks512** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:10 pm

And assuming all goes perfectly, we don't have a Draymond Green. I still think we'd absolutely be in the conversation, but that's a big piece to be missing.

clyde21 · Post #6 » by **clyde21** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:11 pm

knicks512 wrote:And assuming all goes perfectly, we don't have a Draymond Green. I still think we'd absolutely be in the conversation, but that's a big piece to be missing.

...you'd have an AD?

MrDollarBills · Post #7 » by **MrDollarBills** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:11 pm

knicks512 · Post #8 » by **knicks512** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:13 pm

clyde21 wrote:
knicks512 wrote:And assuming all goes perfectly, we don't have a Draymond Green. I still think we'd absolutely be in the conversation, but that's a big piece to be missing.

...you'd have an AD?

Just to clarify since apparently you couldn't glean this off my post:

Big 4 > Big 3

I do think our 3 would be better, but the 4th makes a big difference.

MrDollarBills · Post #9 » by **MrDollarBills** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:14 pm

knicks512 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
knicks512 wrote:And assuming all goes perfectly, we don't have a Draymond Green. I still think we'd absolutely be in the conversation, but that's a big piece to be missing.

...you'd have an AD?

Just to clarify since apparently you couldn't glean this off my post:

Big 4 > Big 3

I do think our 3 would be better, but the 4th makes a big difference.

Yall thought you were going to have Zion earlier this week too. Pump the brakes.

hundreth · Post #10 » by **hundreth** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:15 pm

Even if we (Knicks) got all these players, GS would still be far and away the favorites. Chemistry, coaching, experience playing together and cohesion all matter a lot more than these simplistic greater than less than comparisons.

Dino353 · Post #11 » by **Dino353** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:17 pm

I'm going to roll on the floor when the Nets sign both Kyrie and Durant.

knicks512 · Post #12 » by **knicks512** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:17 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
knicks512 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
...you'd have an AD?

Just to clarify since apparently you couldn't glean this off my post:

Big 4 > Big 3

I do think our 3 would be better, but the 4th makes a big difference.

Yall thought you were going to have Zion earlier this week too. Pump the brakes.

Honestly the reading comprehension is astounding. IF ALL GOES PERFECTLY.

I didn't ask the question, someone else did. I answered it and still wasn't that Knicks fan who has to say everything is gonna go perfect and everyone wants to come here. I pointed out we'd still be missing a huge piece IF ALL GOES PERFECTLY. But you keep letting that Nets inferiority complex cloud your mind.

Maury2423 · Post #13 » by **Maury2423** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:21 pm

Can we wait to see if this actually happens

clyde21 · Post #14 » by **clyde21** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:22 pm

knicks512 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
knicks512 wrote:And assuming all goes perfectly, we don't have a Draymond Green. I still think we'd absolutely be in the conversation, but that's a big piece to be missing.

...you'd have an AD?

Just to clarify since apparently you couldn't glean this off my post:

Big 4 > Big 3

I do think our 3 would be better, but the 4th makes a big difference.

where are you getting Big 4 from?

Myth · Post #15 » by **Myth** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:23 pm

Warriors have to be likely to keep Cousins if KD leaves, right?

knicks512 · Post #16 » by **knicks512** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:24 pm

clyde21 wrote:
knicks512 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
...you'd have an AD?

Just to clarify since apparently you couldn't glean this off my post:

Big 4 > Big 3

I do think our 3 would be better, but the 4th makes a big difference.

where are you getting Big 4 from?

My mistake. I was thinking he was comparing to this year's big 3. Guess my reading comprehension is the problem now. Apologies. Work makes me snarky.

Jay 20 · Post #17 » by **Jay 20** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:24 pm

Myth wrote:Warriors have to be likely to keep Cousins if KD leaves, right?

Only if Cousins wants to make like 6.3 million next season.

laploutocratie · Post #18 » by **laploutocratie** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:26 pm

lol at this hypo scenario before any of the supposed three are with the team

Quattro · Post #19 » by **Quattro** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:27 pm

infinite11285 wrote:Who’s on the rest of the roster with KD, AD, and KI? Is there any cap left?

According to Knicks fans, Kawhi and Lebron (after they trade for him).

And why anyone would be salivating at the prospects of giving Kyrie a max deal as a cornerstone franchise player after what they just witnessed in Boston is beyond me.

KnicksManiac · Post #20 » by **KnicksManiac** » Fri May 17, 2019 6:35 pm

We're really making this thread before any of them are on the Knicks?

ok...