So... How should we view Lillard?

Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285

User avatar
rotty
Head Coach
Posts: 7,456
And1: 35,090
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#61 » by rotty » Sun May 19, 2019 2:35 pm

life_saver wrote:
johanliebert wrote:How come dame/cj donā€™t have the same rep as lowry/demar?

probably coz they never were No1 seed like Raptors were? So, there weren't really much expectations on them in general...before this playoffs started, most of them expected to lose in first round. In a sense, they did kinda over-achieve this year in playoffs but they did under perform big time last season


They got swept the year before by the pelicans and I dont remember them getting that same rep either. We were a 1 seed once and demar/lowry had that rep before last year aswell.

But everyone **** on lowry/demar but I dont hear anyone **** on dame and cj
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 17,776
And1: 16,429
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#62 » by Wolfgang630 » Sun May 19, 2019 2:36 pm

Jazz9 wrote:
Showdown wrote:Passed Kyrie, Westbrook, AD, Lebron and CP3, in a same tier with Harden and Kawhi , worse than Steph, KD, Giannis so around 6th place if you look this year RS and PO.


He isn't better or even in the same tier as AD/LeBron/Harden/Kawhi & co
His RS or one series against OKC isn't changing any of that

Thank you. Dude got so overrated because they beat OKC. Heā€™s not on Hardens Tier.
User avatar
LKN
General Manager
Posts: 9,678
And1: 15,580
Joined: Jun 04, 2018
       

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#63 » by LKN » Sun May 19, 2019 2:43 pm

Think about it this way. Lillard is very good - but he's not an MVP candidate level player. Since 1991 there's been exactly 1 NBA champion without a MVP candidate level player (Detroit in the 00s).

You just aren't going to win without one of those guys.
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 17,776
And1: 16,429
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#64 » by Wolfgang630 » Sun May 19, 2019 2:53 pm

LKN wrote:Think about it this way. Lillard is very good - but he's not an MVP candidate level player. Since 1991 there's been exactly 1 NBA champion without a MVP candidate level player (Detroit in the 00s).

You just aren't going to win without one of those guys.


Yeah and itā€™s not a slight against him. Heā€™s obviously a very good player and I really do like his leadership, and how he carries himself.
Showdown
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,830
And1: 1,102
Joined: Feb 15, 2019

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#65 » by Showdown » Sun May 19, 2019 4:10 pm

nymets1 wrote:
Showdown wrote:
nymets1 wrote:Lillard and McCollum are not going to go far in the playoffs unless they pair up with KD, Lebron, Giannis, Kawhi, Jokic or if some other guy emerges into Tier 1. Lillard and Mccollum are Tier 3 players. If they can't pair up a Tier 1 guy, They need 2 players on their team that are Tier 2 if they want to get back to WCF or further.

Both CJ and Lillard are better than Jokic


Jokic is in Tier 1 with Lebron, Giannis, Durant and Kawhi.


Nah, choked in game 3, couldn't score single point in 4 OT's and then choked in game 7 in series vs Portland , if Murray didn't had great 4th quarter against Spurs in Game 7 they would lose in the first round, was locked by Gibson in the 4th quarter of the final game of the RS last year that decided who is going to the PO, had meltown in deciding game vs OKC and was dominated by Nurkic on game against direct rival for PO two years ago but you stil think that he is better than guy who is only player that had two series deciding buzzer beaters and guy who decided Game 7 on the road against team with best home court in the NBA , it's pure nonsense.
BayWarrior
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,320
And1: 688
Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Location: Redwood City, CA
   

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#66 » by BayWarrior » Sun May 19, 2019 4:21 pm

Lillard is the 2nd best PG in the league IMO.
PizzaSteve
Veteran
Posts: 2,675
And1: 1,837
Joined: May 05, 2015
     

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#67 » by PizzaSteve » Sun May 19, 2019 4:29 pm

Great player, cares, competes. Carries too much weight (edit: metaphorical weight, not lbs).

Basketball is not a pickup game at the NBA level. Steph, Green, Iguadala and Klay have played as a unit for over 5 years and over 100 playoff games. Dame has thrown together a run from the scraps of other teams and his fellow under sized back court partner.

Consider that. In a sport based on repetition to create synergy among 5 men, Portland had built 2 double digit leads against maybe the greatest 'synergistic' core to have been developed together this decade. Harden had his whole team, years to build synergy with an MVP level back court partner and elite level role players, and suffered close to the same fate (GS had to rally champ qualities to get it done, albiet final scores closer).

Has he missed some shots that would have elevated this run to have made history? Sure. He human. Harden also missed some shots and shrank a bit under the onslaught of Warrior rallies (Green led defense/Curry flurries). I cant imagine what it is like to face GS's A game.

But GS knows how to take advantage of an energetic guards, trying to do it all, via their wealth of experience. IMO, Lilliard is an all star level guard with very high future ceiling.
Showdown
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,830
And1: 1,102
Joined: Feb 15, 2019

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#68 » by Showdown » Sun May 19, 2019 4:41 pm

rotty wrote:
life_saver wrote:
johanliebert wrote:How come dame/cj donā€™t have the same rep as lowry/demar?

probably coz they never were No1 seed like Raptors were? So, there weren't really much expectations on them in general...before this playoffs started, most of them expected to lose in first round. In a sense, they did kinda over-achieve this year in playoffs but they did under perform big time last season


They got swept the year before by the pelicans and I dont remember them getting that same rep either. We were a 1 seed once and demar/lowry had that rep before last year aswell.

But everyone **** on lowry/demar but I dont hear anyone **** on dame and cj


They're superior players in comparasion to Lowry and Derozan, both would be All Stars every year in the East and not fake All Stars like these two but legit All stars and Lowry and Derozan would never become All Stars in the West , had much better PO performances in PO historically , their team was legit PO team because West was stacked while in East there was only one legit PO team in previous 8th years, managed to reach the PO even when lost their best player in FA without getting any players in return etc. Derozan and Lowry are in tier with Bledsoe , Russell, Middleton, Dragic and not with Lillard and Cj.

And i don't know why you Raptors fans hate Blazers so much , we saw that after last years PO where majority of negative comments on this board and on social media and youtube was from Raptors fans , same happened after Lillard was 1st Team All NBA and same thing is happening since this WCF started ? I understand fans of the teams like Rockets/OKC/Denver because there is rivalry and teams are competing for better seeds but there is no rivalry with Raptors, i understand Steph's/Westbrook's/Kyrie's/Paul's fans because people are comparing them and they are competing for All star spots and All NBA spots but why you hate us so much ? Media treat us very bad so you can't pretend to be a vicitim in this case and to say how you are overlooked or underrated because in that case you would hate OKC/Denver/Sixers/Rockets/Lakers but instead of that you decide to hate us .It's very hard to understand.
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,627
And1: 10,409
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#69 » by TheNewEra » Sun May 19, 2019 4:48 pm

Krazykiwi wrote:The difference is Lilliard doesnā€™t have Kd, Green to win the games for him when heā€™s playing bad. Look at how pissed poor Curry was playing , but the Warriors kept on winning games due to Kd , Green brilliance , so Curry now having some decent to good games and people donā€™t question him. Goes to show that winning cures everything. lilliard is on a team where he canā€™t afford to have poor games like curry did. His teams simply wonā€™t win without him.



So Rodney Hood didnā€™t help them get over the hump against Denver when Dame was regular? Game 2 Seth pushed them back into the game and Dame/CJ froze up.

Itā€™s pretty false narrative that those two guys have had no help whatsoever on this run. Kawhi has no help
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 60,804
And1: 33,446
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#70 » by Slava » Sun May 19, 2019 4:55 pm

I think he's the level of second option you need to compete for titles, unfortunately when he is your first option, the rest of the team needs to be really phenomenal to get there.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,208
And1: 7,234
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#71 » by Impuniti » Sun May 19, 2019 4:56 pm

spacemonkey wrote:For what it's worth:

Read on Twitter

He was shooting just as bad the 2 1/2 games before he hurt his ribs, one of which was a game 7.
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,208
And1: 7,234
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#72 » by Impuniti » Sun May 19, 2019 4:58 pm

Krazykiwi wrote:If Curry was in Lilliard spot right now , hereā€™s what the fan boys would say ā€œ man look at him , he had 50 points and hit the series ending shot earlier in the playoffs vs OkC. heā€™s so good and clutch , heā€™s just tired from that Denver series and now he has broken ribs, heā€™s injured ā€œ

Tears like this is why the general board is my drug.

It's going to be ok there mate, don't cry too much. :cry:
User avatar
NashtyNas
RealGM
Posts: 10,259
And1: 1,887
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#73 » by NashtyNas » Sun May 19, 2019 5:33 pm

evilpimp972 wrote:Since the WB duel. He's back to his previous playoffs form, shot over 50 % one time in 10 games.
Keep give him a pass

Image


He shot 41% from the floor in the Denver series and did a LOT of other things on the court to help his team win.
Hardly terrible by any stretch of the imagination.

In this series, yes, he's been putrid. But so has CJ and there's not a single soul on the team who can take any pressure off them which is hurting them immensely. Zach Collins and Seth Curry are playing meaningful minutes every game which should tell you how bad that bench is especially with Nurkic not available.

This isn't about how bad CJ and Dame are, it's about how unequipped that team is to handle the Warriors which most of us knew before they ever played a game. I don't think anyone outside of Barkley and Pierce said Portland had a shot in winning this series with or without KD which speaks for itself.
Image

The underappreciated greats:
Image

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
dive135
Junior
Posts: 430
And1: 227
Joined: Oct 11, 2009
   

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#74 » by dive135 » Sun May 19, 2019 5:46 pm

Wolfgang630 wrote:
Jazz9 wrote:
Showdown wrote:Passed Kyrie, Westbrook, AD, Lebron and CP3, in a same tier with Harden and Kawhi , worse than Steph, KD, Giannis so around 6th place if you look this year RS and PO.


He isn't better or even in the same tier as AD/LeBron/Harden/Kawhi & co
His RS or one series against OKC isn't changing any of that

Thank you. Dude got so overrated because they beat OKC. Heā€™s not on Hardens Tier.


What is Hardens Tier? The tier that doesn't finish high enough in the RS to get home court advantage in the Playoffs? The tier where even when Curry and GS are not playing well he still can't beat them? Not that the Blazers haven't struggled against GS, but Houston hardly seems really even to have been a sped bump even when Curry was playing poorly (for him) and if Curry bothered to show up against Houston like he has against Portland, I doubt Houston gets more than a single win, if even that.

It's also not like Harden has a bad team or has to win it all by himself, so if Harden is so much better, why isn't Houston better? Why does Houston/Harden get a free pass for failing, yet we have 5-6 threads on how awful Portland is and they are just lucky and how Lillard is overrated and not a true star like Harden?
Blazers-1977
Veteran
Posts: 2,687
And1: 643
Joined: Aug 19, 2015
   

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#75 » by Blazers-1977 » Sun May 19, 2019 5:49 pm

So the warriors got lucky again


Kyrie got injured against them in 2015, Kawhi in 2017 , Lillard this year
User avatar
Clay Davis
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 6,691
Joined: Nov 06, 2013
 

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#76 » by Clay Davis » Sun May 19, 2019 6:02 pm

michaelm wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
OptionZero wrote:1) Needs more help, their front office is stupid

2) Should forget this loyalty crap and get the **** out of Portland if he ever wants a championship

Saying he's fine in PDX is saying he's fine with the terrible job his front office is doing AND, frankly, fine with merely being good instead of elite. I mean, how the hell is he still so bad against the trap? Because he, like his team, is "happy to be in the playoffs"

meanwhile, from Joe lacob down to steph curry and the rest of the squad, they demanded more and more and more, despite being an utterly trash franchise when curry got drafted and lacob bought the team

look where the are now

When you are ok with where you are, don't be surprised when you never move up
Clearly this Portland team is very, very good. Otherwise they wouldn't be in the conference finals (beating a #1 seed and a team with two superstars) and have had significant leads against a historically great team. Also important to note that they're missing their best big. I'm not sure how much of the game you watched tonight but they were getting carved up in the paint and gave up a bunch of offensive rebounds. They have a top 3 backcourt in the league and there's a huge drop off after those three teams (I have them alongside Houston and Golden State).

It's funny how fans (who, we would think, love the sport and appreciate the competitive nature of it) never give credit to opponents and jump down the throat of teams for losing by exaggerating how bad they are. Merely saying that Portland sucks because they lack what makes Golden State great and that they are merely "happy to be in the playoffs" essentially reduces to saying that they are mediocre because they are down 0-3 to Golden State and that they're content with losing. Were they content with losing when they won a game 7 on the road against the #2 seed in what is historically viewed as one of the hardest places to play in on the road? I'm sure Denver would have loved for them to be more complacent in any of the 4 overtime periods they played against them in what will be remembered as one of the most competitive games of this decade.

And Joe Lacob's wonderful ability to express high expectations by having one of the most potent weapons in NBA history being paid less than a role player isn't likely to be replicated by any other team in the league (and probably won't be replicated in the future).

Sent from my ASUS_X00HD using RealGM mobile app

Sure, see my following post.

It is not all luck though, 29 other teams could have offered Curry more than 12 million per and didnā€™t, and GSW at that time were widely derided for picking Curry over Monta Ellis, including by their own fan base, Lacob In particular soon after buying the franchise being booed at the Oracle for trading Monta.

The franchise is also built on players picked 7th, 11th and 35th, and a basketball savant who saw the potential earlier than most if not all others and joined up.

The next multiple champion who might start being so as early as this year also went the road less travelled in going for Giannis and were somewhat derided for doing so. If they are not the next multiple title winners it will be the Clippers imo who have sensibly hired Jerry West to help construct their roster, cf GSW as above. Not keeping Jerry for as long as he wanted to be there may be Lacobā€™s wrong move btw.



Some level of unconventional thinking was necessary, true. But that doesn't change the mere fact that Stephen Curry was being paid $11 million per year. Also, you should read on the nature of the contract: It was an extension -- he was not on the market. He took it because of concerns over his ankle (concerns which would later be shown to be unfounded). Curry himself has said that his ankle was a major factor in why that number was agreed upon.

Portland is build on players selected 6th, 10th, and 1st. Denver has a great core build around players selected 7th, 41st, and two players both selected at 19th. There are quite a few teams who have had excellent results this season with savvy signings and picks.
Image
Steelo Green wrote:People are expecting way too much from Barnes out of the get go. He is a project player who will need 2-3 years before he makes a major impact.
User avatar
Clay Davis
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 6,691
Joined: Nov 06, 2013
 

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#77 » by Clay Davis » Sun May 19, 2019 6:03 pm

michaelm wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
OptionZero wrote:1) Needs more help, their front office is stupid

2) Should forget this loyalty crap and get the **** out of Portland if he ever wants a championship

Saying he's fine in PDX is saying he's fine with the terrible job his front office is doing AND, frankly, fine with merely being good instead of elite. I mean, how the hell is he still so bad against the trap? Because he, like his team, is "happy to be in the playoffs"

meanwhile, from Joe lacob down to steph curry and the rest of the squad, they demanded more and more and more, despite being an utterly trash franchise when curry got drafted and lacob bought the team

look where the are now

When you are ok with where you are, don't be surprised when you never move up
Clearly this Portland team is very, very good. Otherwise they wouldn't be in the conference finals (beating a #1 seed and a team with two superstars) and have had significant leads against a historically great team. Also important to note that they're missing their best big. I'm not sure how much of the game you watched tonight but they were getting carved up in the paint and gave up a bunch of offensive rebounds. They have a top 3 backcourt in the league and there's a huge drop off after those three teams (I have them alongside Houston and Golden State).

It's funny how fans (who, we would think, love the sport and appreciate the competitive nature of it) never give credit to opponents and jump down the throat of teams for losing by exaggerating how bad they are. Merely saying that Portland sucks because they lack what makes Golden State great and that they are merely "happy to be in the playoffs" essentially reduces to saying that they are mediocre because they are down 0-3 to Golden State and that they're content with losing. Were they content with losing when they won a game 7 on the road against the #2 seed in what is historically viewed as one of the hardest places to play in on the road? I'm sure Denver would have loved for them to be more complacent in any of the 4 overtime periods they played against them in what will be remembered as one of the most competitive games of this decade.

And Joe Lacob's wonderful ability to express high expectations by having one of the most potent weapons in NBA history being paid less than a role player isn't likely to be replicated by any other team in the league (and probably won't be replicated in the future).

Sent from my ASUS_X00HD using RealGM mobile app

Sure, see my following post.

It is not all luck though, 29 other teams could have offered Curry more than 12 million per and didnā€™t, and GSW at that time were widely derided for picking Curry over Monta Ellis, including by their own fan base, Lacob In particular soon after buying the franchise being booed at the Oracle for trading Monta.

The franchise is also built on players picked 7th, 11th and 35th, and a basketball savant who saw the potential earlier than most if not all others and joined up.

The next multiple champion who might start being so as early as this year also went the road less travelled in going for Giannis and were somewhat derided for doing so. If they are not the next multiple title winners it will be the Clippers imo who have sensibly hired Jerry West to help construct their roster, cf GSW as above. Not keeping Jerry for as long as he wanted to be there may be Lacobā€™s wrong move btw.


Some level of unconventional thinking was necessary, true. But that doesn't change the mere fact that Stephen Curry was being paid $11 million per year. Also, you should read on the nature of the contract: It was an extension -- he was not on the market. He took it because of concerns over his ankle (concerns which would later be shown to be unfounded). Curry himself has said that his ankle was a major factor in why that number was agreed upon.

My argument was never that the Warriors are not well run, but that the most pivotal moment in the franchise's history -- Curry's $44 million over four years -- is not likely to re-occur (both because of the rarity of players of Curry's calibre and because of further due diligence on the part of players in understanding their future medical prospects).

Portland is build on players selected 6th, 10th, and 1st. Denver has a great core build around players selected 7th, 41st, and two players both selected at 19th. There are quite a few teams who have had excellent results this season with savvy signings and picks.
Image
Steelo Green wrote:People are expecting way too much from Barnes out of the get go. He is a project player who will need 2-3 years before he makes a major impact.
Blazers-1977
Veteran
Posts: 2,687
And1: 643
Joined: Aug 19, 2015
   

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#78 » by Blazers-1977 » Sun May 19, 2019 6:14 pm

If we had Nurk in this series and a healthy Lillard we win (assuming Durant is still not playing )
User avatar
Baski
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 3,950
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
   

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#79 » by Baski » Sun May 19, 2019 6:19 pm

Just reading through to see whether anyone would talk about how Lillard is creating space for his teammates by being doubled and trapped and thus is not in fact **** the bed. You would think after all the talk during the Houston series at least one Ws fan would come to Lillard's defense in this way.
As I expected, no such mentions, because it's a garbage concept that does not preclude anyone from playing poorly on their own right.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 47,541
And1: 29,172
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: So... How should we view Lillard? 

Post#80 » by og15 » Sun May 19, 2019 6:23 pm

Lalouie wrote:
life_saver wrote:
Lalouie wrote:
lillard and harden try to become someone they ain't in post season play

Harden is much better than Dame in post season...he also did have pretty good series offensively vs Warriors


yeah but if you take the breadth of harden's past post seasons,,,,,,,,,
it's as if the stars are afraid of the moment because they're afraid to be their dominant regular season selves. like somehow doing so in post season is a bad label to carry.

except westbrook. westbrook is who he is, and is comfortable with it. he'll be the same player and play the same way, he did in the regular season. he's not afraid of the moment, inefficiencies and all - he don't care

....they are trying to make good decisions and play to win not just to get their stats. In the regular season they played a variety of teams, some easier than others, in the post season, you usually play better defensive teams with better game plans for you. Russ is being himself with three straight first round exits (and I do think he's also playing to win, not for stats, just in the way he sees), not sure why you are using him as the example for them when he's not having post-season success. Both Harden in 2017 and Lillard this year have had their teams beat Westbrook's team quicker than we expected (or unexpectedly). I'm more partial to him in 2017 because they did well when he was on the court, but still, why should they emulate a guy they are beating?

Return to The General Board