ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

RoxSteady
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,633
And1: 5,448
Joined: Jul 22, 2019
 

ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#1 » by RoxSteady » Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:54 pm

OK, so they put down the crack pipe for 8 picks. None of these are too offensive; although LeBron's probably ranked too high. Giannis (presumably #1) and Kawhi (#2) are left.

10. PG13
9. Dame
8. Embiid
7. Jokic
6. Steph
5. AD
4. Harden
3. LBJ
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,581
And1: 33,091
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Extra: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Aren't Horrible 

Post#2 » by Dominator83 » Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:56 pm

Even a broken clock is right twice a day
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
User avatar
Asif16
RealGM
Posts: 19,473
And1: 27,704
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 

Post#3 » by Asif16 » Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:56 pm

Dame at 9 and Mccolum at 13.

You would think they could have at least put some sort of a fight against the Warriors with such a loaded back court.

Essentially, what I'm trying to say is that Dame probably should be 13 while Mccolum shoudl've been way lower
getjeffrey
Ballboy
Posts: 24
And1: 20
Joined: Aug 07, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#4 » by getjeffrey » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:01 pm



Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,124
And1: 24,346
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#5 » by GeorgeMarcus » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:04 pm

“Battling illness last spring and having illness questioned, Embiid saw his production on both ends of the court decrease in the playoffs”
:rofl:

Unreal display of ignorance. This trumps the Winslow PG debacle in my book
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
User avatar
Rockice_24
Starter
Posts: 2,180
And1: 816
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 

Post#6 » by Rockice_24 » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:04 pm

Asif16 wrote:Dame at 9 and Mccolum at 13.

You would think they could have at least put some sort of a fight against the Warriors with such a loaded back court.

Essentially, what I'm trying to say is that Dame probably should be 13 while Mccolum shoudl've been way lower


Dame seems about right but yeah McCollum is way high. I would expect a 2 to be the first number I see.
User avatar
Funcrusher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,084
And1: 6,569
Joined: Apr 14, 2017
Location: Stolen from Africa
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#7 » by Funcrusher » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:05 pm

Nah, it's still terrible. Curry being the 6th ranked player is almost as bad as McCollum at 13.
gh123 wrote:Zion lucky if he gets 18 ppg on decent efficiency. Midget big man is a no-career in NBA. Chuck being the only wonder. Zion is the next Tractor Trailer at best.
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,124
And1: 24,346
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#8 » by GeorgeMarcus » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:09 pm

Funcrusher wrote:Nah, it's still terrible. Curry being the 6th ranked player is almost as bad as McCollum at 13.


Jesus. I hadn’t made it that far yet. Absolute garbage
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 37,323
And1: 68,349
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#9 » by Duke4life831 » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:11 pm

AD over Curry seems off to me
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,176
And1: 9,864
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#10 » by Lunartic » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:13 pm

Not a big Curry fan but he should be above Harden/AD

LeBron should be above Giannis at #2
kuclas
General Manager
Posts: 7,771
And1: 3,983
Joined: Nov 08, 2016
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#11 » by kuclas » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:15 pm

AD is the only one who’s probably a little too high at 5. The top 10 are pretty spot on. Can move a players 1-2 slots up and down based on reputation.
XxIronChainzxX
RealGM
Posts: 14,457
And1: 7,665
Joined: Oct 22, 2004
   

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#12 » by XxIronChainzxX » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:18 pm

RoxSteady wrote:OK, so they put down the crack pipe for 8 picks. None of these are too offensive; although LeBron's probably ranked too high. Giannis (presumably #1) and Kawhi (#2) are left.

10. PG13
9. Dame
8. Embiid
7. Jokic
6. Steph
5. AD
4. Harden
3. LBJ


I assume Kawhi is #1. But in any case, it's not that hard to name the 10 best players in the NBA out of order.
User avatar
Hindenburg
Head Coach
Posts: 7,426
And1: 13,855
Joined: Feb 10, 2015
 

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#13 » by Hindenburg » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:19 pm

Davis should be at the end of top 10. What exactly did he accomplish last year to move up a spot?

Curry should be in top 3-4.

LeBron should be in #5 spot or lower.
BNM
Analyst
Posts: 3,566
And1: 4,306
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 

Post#14 » by BNM » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:33 pm

Asif16 wrote:Dame at 9 and Mccolum at 13.

You would think they could have at least put some sort of a fight against the Warriors with such a loaded back court.

Essentially, what I'm trying to say is that Dame probably should be 13 while Mccolum shoudl've been way lower


All the ranking's I've seen, have Dame at 9 or 10. I agree C.J. is WAY too high (should be around 30, where they had him last year).

They did put up a fight against the Warriors. They had double digit 3rd quarter leads in 3 of the 4 games, and they did it with these other 3 starters:

An injured Enes "Can't Play" Kanter
Al-Farouq Aminu
Moe Harkless

The fact that Dame and C.J. were able to drag that mess to the WESTERN Conference Finals speaks well for how good they are. Yes, C.J. is rated WAY too high by ESPN, but overall Dame and C.J. aren't Portland's problem. It is the players they've been surrounded with that are.
OfficialRef
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 2,585
Joined: May 05, 2014

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#15 » by OfficialRef » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:37 pm

i'm not so sure lillard is a better player than PG...
Pennebaker
Head Coach
Posts: 7,027
And1: 5,587
Joined: Nov 02, 2013

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#16 » by Pennebaker » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:39 pm

RoxSteady wrote:OK, so they put down the crack pipe for 8 picks. None of these are too offensive; although LeBron's probably ranked too high. Giannis (presumably #1) and Kawhi (#2) are left.

10. PG13
9. Dame
8. Embiid
7. Jokic
6. Steph
5. AD
4. Harden
3. LBJ


The biggest issue is that LeBron is better than both Giannis and Kawhi and Paul George is not a top 10 player.
Image
IgorK
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 4,788
Joined: Mar 06, 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#17 » by IgorK » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:47 pm

I was hoping they'd put LeBron even lower. The amount of crow to be eaten in the United States at the end of the season may land the corvus specimen on the Protected Species list.
"You want me to own a team and deal with these rich, spoiled stubborn athletes, and try to get them to perform? No thank you." - Kobe

AMG
WarriorGM
General Manager
Posts: 9,035
And1: 4,274
Joined: Aug 19, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#18 » by WarriorGM » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:51 pm

Only redeeming thing about this list is that it is proof if anyone ever needed it of how biased the media is against Curry.
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,980
And1: 10,716
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#19 » by TheNewEra » Thu Sep 26, 2019 8:58 pm

Anthony Davis my goodness you put that man over Curry?
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,980
And1: 10,716
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#20 » by TheNewEra » Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:00 pm

OfficialRef wrote:i'm not so sure lillard is a better player than PG...



Believe most teams would take PG over Dame. It’s close though

Return to The General Board