


Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
frothbrain wrote:clipps looking good without george and kawhi.
rockets look like theyll need to play harden 44 minutes a night to remain competitive.
frothbrain wrote:clipps looking good without george and kawhi.
rockets look like theyll need to play harden 44 minutes a night to remain competitive.
Catchall wrote:It's a hot take, but the Clippers' PGs are sub-par playmakers. I think that's going to hold them back.
ken6199 wrote:Same old Rockets that need Harden to do everything for them. Mixed feeling watching this.
zimpy27 wrote:Catchall wrote:It's a hot take, but the Clippers' PGs are sub-par playmakers. I think that's going to hold them back.
Yeah they look a little disorganized, they don't have Kawhi or PG13 out there though, so it's hard to know what their true offense will look like.
I think the C position is going to be hard for them. Managing Harrell and Zubac. I just have a feeling that Zubac should be played more but they may not pull the trigger on that in order to appease Harrell. Unless Harrell can be a PF and get his outside shot going? He looks a little over-powered as a C at times.
SpreeS wrote:22 FGA
20 FTA
7 AST
2 TOV
28 MIN
How many times need to lose in PO, that these HOU idiots start to understand: it isn’t winning basketball.
Adam Stern wrote:SpreeS wrote:22 FGA
20 FTA
7 AST
2 TOV
28 MIN
How many times need to lose in PO, that these HOU idiots start to understand: it isn’t winning basketball.
That might make sense if the Rockets were perennial bottom feeders...or struggling to make the playoffs...or getting bounced in the first round...or losing to lesser teams.
From what I've seen, the Rockets win plenty.
Oh and It's only preseason