bearadonisdna wrote:The_Hater wrote:bearadonisdna wrote:
Objectively a guy like dlo is more valuable to a franchise than a guy who is a single digit rebounder and scorer.
Also dlo isnt that inefficient.
In the same summer 1 of these guys got paid 10 mil more than the other.
Its a pretty clear indicator of value that most can see.
Draymond Green is a litmus test for people who understand the true value of NBA players. Al horford is another. Kyle Lowry is another. Players that bring several elite skills to the table and don’t take anything off. Players who show up as important cogs on winning teams rather than high scorers or ‘stat guys’ on middling/bad teams. The people who understand that scoring and ppg isn’t everything understand what I’m talking about here.
And I’m sorry but anyone that screams ‘but he averaged single digits last season’ clearly doesn’t get it. Don’t worry, you’re not alone. So I digress. Regardless, Green is a winner, Russell is not. Green going to the HOF when his career is over, Russell is not.
You probably have a hangup on dlo, i dont. .
I don't know what a hang-up is exactly? I said that he was a poor defender, which is true, and that he was inefficient on offense, which is true. And I added that he played horrible in his first trip to the playoff. I'm just stating my opinion, which is supported by facts, and have been presented with nothing to the contrary to sway that opinion.
Perhaps the problem here is that you have hang-up on Draymond because you clearly don't recognize him as the great all-around player he is?