Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,288
- And1: 28,273
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Now WB played 15 more games than him last year, so that should obviously be taken into account, but Paul was still much better. The only thing that WB does better than paul is rebound and score more with significantly less efficiency. And defensively, Paul is still one of the best poing guards in the league on that end whereas WB is a liability.
Putting a high volume shot taker who cant really space the floor or defend beside Harden never made sense to me and i have no idea how the analytically inclined guys in Houston thought it was a good idea.
Putting a high volume shot taker who cant really space the floor or defend beside Harden never made sense to me and i have no idea how the analytically inclined guys in Houston thought it was a good idea.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
- Woody Allen
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,799
- And1: 2,840
- Joined: Aug 13, 2002
- Location: Toronto
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Paul wasn't a good fit for Harden-D'Antoni ball. Westbrook is even worse. I agree.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 151
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
They thought it was a good idea because :
1) They think Westbrook is a better player than Chris Paul.
2) Westbrook plays significantly more games than Chris Paul each year. It should in theory help Harden not having to carry as much of the load as he did last year.
Houston's front office belief (in particular Daryl Morey) is talent and stars above chemistry and fit.
So trading for the better, younger and more healthy superstar actually makes all the sense in the world if you consider how they operate.
1) They think Westbrook is a better player than Chris Paul.
2) Westbrook plays significantly more games than Chris Paul each year. It should in theory help Harden not having to carry as much of the load as he did last year.
Houston's front office belief (in particular Daryl Morey) is talent and stars above chemistry and fit.
So trading for the better, younger and more healthy superstar actually makes all the sense in the world if you consider how they operate.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,379
- And1: 6,497
- Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Lets give them 20 or so games before we overreact. The pairing is obviously... uh curious? Sometimes I think it'll work really well, other times i'm not sure. But we gotta at least give them some time to work through the troubles.
If the Clippers win the championship next year I'm getting banned from RealGM
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
- Posts: 85,319
- And1: 40,048
- Joined: May 23, 2001
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Woody Allen wrote:Paul wasn't a good fit for Harden-D'Antoni ball. .
Why do some people keep saying this? What evidence are you using to make the claim he was a poor fit?
Paul was an excellent fit for the Rockets. His numbers when Harden sat were excellent, even last season, and they almost won the title after winning 65 games 2 seasons ago.They were the only team the past 2 season that gave a healthy Warriors juggernaut any sort of trouble in the playoffs. His numbers when he shared the floor with Harden weren't as good but that's because Harden had the ball in his hands most of the time, but CP3 was still an excellent shooter off-ball and an excellent defender.
The reason they traded him had nothing to do with fit, it had to do with CP3 getting older and probably fading as a player and not being able to stay healthy. That last part may have cost them an NBA title in 2018.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
April 14th, 2019.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,288
- And1: 28,273
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
BballIntellect wrote:They thought it was a good idea because :
1) They think Westbrook is a better player than Chris Paul.
2) Westbrook plays significantly more games than Chris Paul each year. It should in theory help Harden not having to carry as much of the load as he did last year.
Houston's front office belief (in particular Daryl Morey) is talent and stars above chemistry and fit.
So trading for the better, younger and more healthy superstar actually makes all the sense in the world if you consider how they operate.
Younger and healthier, sure. Better? Not by vast majority of metrics
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
- Woody Allen
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,799
- And1: 2,840
- Joined: Aug 13, 2002
- Location: Toronto
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Forte IV wrote:Lets give them 20 or so games before we overreact.
Who's overreacting? We're barely reacting, the thread is super mellow. Did you want us to say nothing at all?
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,848
- And1: 11,785
- Joined: Jun 09, 2018
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
I'm pessimistic about the fit initially
But I think once Westbrook fully realizes it's Harden's team & takes the necessary backseat, Rockets will find their footing
But I think once Westbrook fully realizes it's Harden's team & takes the necessary backseat, Rockets will find their footing
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,770
- And1: 18,211
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Bentonville, AR
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
The fact that russ took 11 threes in a preseason game proves he isn’t changing. In fact he’s getting worse. He had a quote last night about needing time to figure it out. He has been saying the same quote the last two years with his slow starts to the season. He’s had like 7 knee procedures. He’s falling fast. It’s kind of sad.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,770
- And1: 18,211
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Bentonville, AR
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Pharenheit wrote:I'm pessimistic about the fit initially
But I think once Westbrook realizes it's Harden's team & takes the necessary backseat, Rockets will find their footing
George was clearly the better player between he and russ last year. Although russ deferred at times last year, it didn’t change who russ was at his core. It didn’t stop him from taking defensive possessions off, I’ll advised threes and not playing off the ball.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 151
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
ThunderBolt wrote:The fact that russ took 11 threes in a preseason game proves he isn’t changing. In fact he’s getting worse. He had a quote last night about needing time to figure it out. He has been saying the same quote the last two years with his slow starts to the season. He’s had like 7 knee procedures. He’s falling fast. It’s kind of sad.
Actually he is changing. Westbrook didn't take 11 threes per game in OKC. The Rockets philosophy is either shoot the three or the layup. He's just not very good at hitting shots efficiently from any part of the floor. That's it.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,379
- And1: 6,497
- Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Woody Allen wrote:Forte IV wrote:Lets give them 20 or so games before we overreact.
Who's overreacting? We're barely reacting, the thread is super mellow. Did you want us to say nothing at all?
Creating a thread because of a pre-season game(s) is by default, overreacting
If the Clippers win the championship next year I'm getting banned from RealGM
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,770
- And1: 18,211
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Bentonville, AR
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
BballIntellect wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:The fact that russ took 11 threes in a preseason game proves he isn’t changing. In fact he’s getting worse. He had a quote last night about needing time to figure it out. He has been saying the same quote the last two years with his slow starts to the season. He’s had like 7 knee procedures. He’s falling fast. It’s kind of sad.
Actually he is changing. Westbrook didn't take 11 threes per game in OKC. The Rockets philosophy is either shoot the three or the layup. He's just not very good at hitting shots efficiently from any part of the floor. That's it.
He’s shot 21 of them through 3 games which is a little above his average in okc. The 19% he’s hit so far is bad even for russ.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,848
- And1: 11,785
- Joined: Jun 09, 2018
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
ThunderBolt wrote:Pharenheit wrote:I'm pessimistic about the fit initially
But I think once Westbrook realizes it's Harden's team & takes the necessary backseat, Rockets will find their footing
George was clearly the better player between he and russ last year. Although russ deferred at times last year, it didn’t change who russ was at his core. It didn’t stop him from taking defensive possessions off, I’ll advised threes and not playing off the ball.
Nah even more of a backseat than he took last year to PG
20 shots per game is way out of the question for Westy if Rockets are going to succeed. CP3 was essentially 12 shots a game last year with Houston. WB will need to learn to defer like never before IMO
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 151
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Pharenheit wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:Pharenheit wrote:I'm pessimistic about the fit initially
But I think once Westbrook realizes it's Harden's team & takes the necessary backseat, Rockets will find their footing
George was clearly the better player between he and russ last year. Although russ deferred at times last year, it didn’t change who russ was at his core. It didn’t stop him from taking defensive possessions off, I’ll advised threes and not playing off the ball.
Nah even more of a backseat than he took last year to PG
20 shots per game is way out of the question for Westy if Rockets are going to succeed. CP3 was essentially 12 shots a game last year with Houston WB will need to learn to defer like never before
I think Houston can live with Westbrook taking 16 shots a game because Harden was taking too many shots last year. Wesbrook just can't shoot more than 16 a game. If he shoots 20 shots per game again, the Rockets are screwed.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,484
- And1: 2,332
- Joined: May 18, 2014
- Location: CF
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
People are looking at offense. He is way further away from Paul defensively than offensively. There was a large gap on that end in their primes but it’s only bigger now.
Swinging for the fences.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,848
- And1: 11,785
- Joined: Jun 09, 2018
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
BballIntellect wrote:Pharenheit wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:
George was clearly the better player between he and russ last year. Although russ deferred at times last year, it didn’t change who russ was at his core. It didn’t stop him from taking defensive possessions off, I’ll advised threes and not playing off the ball.
Nah even more of a backseat than he took last year to PG
20 shots per game is way out of the question for Westy if Rockets are going to succeed. CP3 was essentially 12 shots a game last year with Houston WB will need to learn to defer like never before
I think Houston can live with Westbrook taking 16 shots a game because Harden was taking too many shots last year. Wesbrook just can't shoot more than 16 a game. If he shoots 20 shots per game again, the Rockets are screwed.
It will be a lesser offensive load on Harden for sure but WB is not a guy you can always rely upon at all times. 16 shots sounds about right
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Junior
- Posts: 360
- And1: 189
- Joined: Aug 12, 2018
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
Neither one is a great fit with Harden but Westbrook is a tough fit with almost anyone.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Junior
- Posts: 290
- And1: 151
- Joined: Sep 04, 2019
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
I don't get how people keep pretending like Chris Paul was a good defender last year. He looked extremely slow and declined in every single way last year.
If Steph Curry is considered a defensive liability, then Chris Paul should be considered one too. Not to mention Chris Paul is barely 6 foot tall and teams used to get advantage all the time of the size and strenght taller guards and forwards had on him by bullying him in the post.
If Steph Curry is considered a defensive liability, then Chris Paul should be considered one too. Not to mention Chris Paul is barely 6 foot tall and teams used to get advantage all the time of the size and strenght taller guards and forwards had on him by bullying him in the post.
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,585
- And1: 6,035
- Joined: Jul 07, 2017
Re: Paul to Westbrook is a pretty big loss for the Rox
I’ll reserve judgement for when they actually play some games together.