RealGM

The ratings have SUCKED this season

No need for the Celtics. The Lakers alone would bring the fans back.
The Lakers are far and away the most popular team in the USA & the world.
They need to be there.

Why do you care about the ratings?

Sent from my Redmi Note 7 using Tapatalk

His Airness 23 wrote:The ratings have SUCKED this season

Lakers-Celtics finals would be a major ratings boost.

Clippers-Milwaukee? Who is going to watch that? Just family.

Celtics-Lakers would certainly give good storylines which could be hyped. Then you have the Lebron versus Celtics storyline.

So that would certainly help ESPN sell the series and give the talking heads something to discuss.

Seriously don't understand why people are concerned with ratings... Basketball is not going anywhere, ratings do not affect your paycheck or your enjoyment for the game ya weirdos.

Most people just stream games online anyways.

I personally don't care about how much money is going into ESPN and TNT's pockets. I hope Nuggets make it out of the West.

both LA teams and Boston are elite this year, yet the ratings are the worst they've been in years...maybe it's not all about large markets (i know, crazy talk).

No.

The ratings suck nationally and are actually good in local markets where teams are trying to win.

Reason for that is simple... you show gstate, the pelicans without zion and some Kawhi load management on over half of your national broadcasts... what do you expect?

Use some common sense by flexing these games and then show me the ratings...

Warriors splash bros and wiggins big 3
Kd return
Healthy zion and pels
Improved Knicks

Will bring ratings back next season

DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Warriors splash bros and wiggins big 3
Kd return
Healthy zion and pels
Improved Knicks

Will bring ratings back next season

Don't forget wizards will have Draymond Green and a likely top pick to grab James Wiseman...

Who cares about ratings?

In a perfect world a final four of NY vs Boston and LAL vs LAC would probably be the best/most valuable.

Maybe ESPN and TNT will start playing smart and unload deadweight sports celebs.

His Airness 23 wrote:The ratings have SUCKED this season

Lakers Celtics is what all the non-Laker/Celtic fans WANT and NEED! They're all clamoring for the history and the storylines and the romance. No one wants no Clippers - Bucks. Snoozefest.

Raps fans and Bucks fans even want Celtics - Lakers.

Pennebaker wrote:

His Airness 23 wrote:The ratings have SUCKED this season

Lakers-Celtics finals would be a major ratings boost.

Clippers-Milwaukee? Who is going to watch that? Just family.

I question the benefit the Celtics would bring to ratings. The Celtics have 0 exciting players and 0 superstars. They are a collection of nice/solid players, similar to MIA (except Kemba is a lesser star than Butler). Yes, they have a historic past but how often do you see people in other places wearing Celtics gear? When I lived in BOS I saw some stuff obviously, but I never saw anything Celtics when living in either STL or MIL. The Celtics are basically the STL Cardinals of the NBA.

PHI would be a MUCH, MUCH bigger National draw than BOS

MrPerfect1 wrote:

Pennebaker wrote:

His Airness 23 wrote:The ratings have SUCKED this season

Lakers-Celtics finals would be a major ratings boost.

Clippers-Milwaukee? Who is going to watch that? Just family.

I question the benefit the Celtics would bring to ratings. The Celtics have 0 exciting players and 0 superstars. They are a collection of nice/solid players, similar to MIA (except Kemba is a lesser star than Butler). Yes, they have a historic past but how often do you see people in other places wearing Celtics gear? When I lived in BOS I saw some stuff obviously, but I never saw anything Celtics when living in either STL or MIL. The Celtics are basically the STL Cardinals of the NBA.

PHI would be a MUCH, MUCH bigger National draw than BOS

Not even remotely true. The Celtics have a top 5 following in the world, the Sixers aren't even close. I think most people would agree the Celtics are a top 5 most popular franchise. The Cardinals are great in St. Louis but outside of it don't have that kind of following even with 11 World Series rings.

No same old crap. LeBron is getting old and Boston doesn’t have any marketable players.

Lucky Clover wrote:

MrPerfect1 wrote:

Pennebaker wrote:
Lakers-Celtics finals would be a major ratings boost.

Clippers-Milwaukee? Who is going to watch that? Just family.

I question the benefit the Celtics would bring to ratings. The Celtics have 0 exciting players and 0 superstars. They are a collection of nice/solid players, similar to MIA (except Kemba is a lesser star than Butler). Yes, they have a historic past but how often do you see people in other places wearing Celtics gear? When I lived in BOS I saw some stuff obviously, but I never saw anything Celtics when living in either STL or MIL. The Celtics are basically the STL Cardinals of the NBA.

PHI would be a MUCH, MUCH bigger National draw than BOS

Not even remotely true. The Celtics have a top 5 following in the world, the Sixers aren't even close. I think most people would agree the Celtics are a top 5 most popular franchise. The Cardinals are great in St. Louis but outside of it don't have that kind of following even with 11 World Series rings.

They have such a big following that I have never seen anyone wearing any of their clothing outside of BOS despite having lived in multiple large US cities. Must be quite the following !!! Heck, I saw more Chris Cooley Washington Redskins jerseys being worn when I was in STL than I saw all Celtics gear combined.

I would bet the average person off the street couldn't name even 1 Celtics player.