nikster wrote:The_Hater wrote:jamaalstar21 wrote:
As is well documented, the Bucks defense is built on a hyper-conservative scheme: protect the rim at all cost, even if that means surrendering a ton of threes. And boy do they surrender a ton of threes. Opponents take 40 a game against them (the most attempts allowed in the league) and it's not like these attempts are bad ones, Bucks are roughly average in terms of the percentage taken against them (.355%, 15th in the league). Bledsoe and Divencenzo are great at protecting the nail and then closing out hard, but I do wonder if this style makes them vulnerable to a random 3-game walloping when an opposing coach (They'll face either Nick Nurse or Brad Stevens likely) really tries to stack the deck against their defense. I worry about Coach Bud's stubbornness. Bud refused to switch up his defense last year, like by having Giannis guard Kawhi for example, and he watched his team lose 4 games in a row. That kind of coaching conservatism makes me think the Bucks are vulnerable.
I do not doubt the Bucks defensive personnel (elite) or their defensive system (all time great). I am curious to see how inpregnable this defense is against playoff basketball. I'm not sounding the alarm bells, but I think it's something to watch. Will Bud switch things up if a team gets hot while taking like 50 attempts?
I get that. And the Raptors surrender the 2nd most 3’s as well as more corner 3’s than any other team in the league. (The Clippers, another elite defense, are 4th highest)
So there are, the leagues top 2 defenses in the league both surrendering shots that conventional wisdom says they shouldn’t, yet both defending at an elite level. So I’m not convinced these 3 point attempt numbers actually tell us what many people think they should and I’m not sure we should be viewing them as a defensive weakness. It seems like the exact opposite is actually happening, perhaps because their opponents are having trouble getting into the paint and end up settling for contested 3’s late in the clock?
On face value the defences seem similar but they have different priorities. Raptors close out like maniacs, and are only okay with giving up 3s to mediocre shooters.
While they are right behind Bucks in 3pA given up, Raptors hold their opponents to a league worst percentage from 3.
Yeah just came here to point that out^. The Raptors do give up threes, but not because they run a conservative, protect the rim style. Raptors mostly like to overload the strongside, double and trap, and the rotate like crazy. They force an offense into taking bad, desperate threes, especially corner threes from bad shooters facing a manic closeout.
I like the Raptors defense more in terms of adaptability. Now the Bucks protect the paint way better, and Giannis is an absurd defense asset, just sweeping around the paint. I think most teams just wont be able to break the Bucks defense, but I am worried what happens if someone does. Boston, Toronto and Miami are of bombing you to death with threes.