Baronious wrote:OdomFan wrote:Baronious wrote:
Even Kareem? At this point, Kareem and Jordan are the only 2 guys that have an argument over LeBron.
Tim Duncan has absolutely no argument over LeBron after this 4th chip.
He absolutely does have an argument over Lebron. Yall like to go on and on about Lebron beating the Warriors. Well Duncan is the only one that led his Spurs over the Shaq and Kobe Lakers in 1999 and 2003. Plus Duncan won the head to head Finals matchup with Lebron 2-1. Only lost the 1 because he wasn't in the game to attempt to get that rebound that led to Ray Allen sealing the deal in 2013. Disagree all you want, but that's the argument.
I didn't say a single word about Bron beating the Warriors.. If we're going to nit pick stuff, I can easily say Duncan beat a 22 year old LeBron that had no business being in the finals with that sorry Cleveland team. Your message alone shows Duncan has no argument. You're just coming up with random BS to try to prove your point. It's also funny how you act like Duncan went head to head with Bron and beat him.
Duncan put up 15.4/10/2 in the 2014 finals while Bron put up 28.2/7.8/4. Similar story in 2013 and you have the guts to talk about the Ray Allen shot. Get real....
LeBron has more FMVP, regular season MVP, more all-nba selections, better stats, better longevity. Being up 2-1 with the head to head matchups doesn't give Duncan an argument over Lebron.
Forget about Bron. Duncan doesn't have an argument over Kareem either.
How exactly does Lebrons 2007 Cavs have no business in the Finals judging by the weak teams he went against to get to those Finals. A Unprepared Wizards team that lost one of it's core players in Larry Hughes, An aged out Nets team and a Pistons team that no longer had its best Defensive Center Ben Wallace.
Never said you personally said anything about the Warriors, but that's in general what many Lebron fans do bring up when it comes to all time conversations. They'll cling heavily on that fact that Lebron James Led his team back from a 3-1 lead against those gosh darn 73-9 Golden State Warriors. Which I countered by mentioning Duncans argument of ending the Lakers chances of 4 peating, and potentially 5 peating had LA been able to beat them in 1999 or 2003. Got it now? If not that's on you.
Using stats to try to discredit Duncans impact is foolish because anyone who knows Duncans game knows that he was never a stats guy. he led the team by being even more unselfish than Lebron James. Buying into his coaches system unlike Lebron which is another thing he has over Lebron btw. With Lebron there's only 1 major system and that's give him the ball and get out the way. Spo might have gotten Bron to listen more than any other coach, but when it comes down to it it was still majorly Lebron Ball, and guess what? The Duncan led Spurs destroyed that system in 2014 regardless of how you want to spin it. So yeah. Imo Tim Duncan > Lebron James.
Btw Duncan was every bit as elite as Kareem was, and imo definitely a better leader. Every bit as good of an all around player even as far back as their NCAA Careers.