Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move?

Moderators: zimpy27, KingDavid, jamaalstar21, infinite11285, BombsquadSammy, ken6199, Domejandro, bwgood77, Dirk

akula1488
Pro Prospect
Posts: 906
And1: 171
Joined: Nov 12, 2006

Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#1 » by akula1488 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:03 am

Should they try to get a two way, backcourt star that can handle and create the ball with good outside shooting? Basically an upgrade over Shoreder. Ideal PG would be Kyle Lowry but he is already 34 (price would be cheaper). Basketball wise, Lowry + Lebron + AD would be an amazing trio. If not Lowry, who else they can try to target?
MindState
Senior
Posts: 662
And1: 907
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#3 » by MindState » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:05 am

No. They should enjoy their summer league title from last year and let LeBron age gracefully into the sunlight while getting beat down by KD in the finals for his few final years.
User avatar
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 22,420
And1: 2,489
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Contact:

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#4 » by bstein14 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:06 am

Kuzma on that contract has zero trade value. If he signed a cheaper deal then sure I could see some teams have interest maybe.

They emptied the chamber to get Davis. KCP has some value but not sure anyone gives up more than what he is worth to the Lakers.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 18,806
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#6 » by iamworthy » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:08 am

:lol: Lakers will be fine as is.
Image
MindState
Senior
Posts: 662
And1: 907
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#7 » by MindState » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:09 am

iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.


Image

Bruh. :lol:

Its a wrap. A 58 year old LeBron aint beating that Nets team. I dont know what else to tell you.
kobe24_818
Ballboy
Posts: 11
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 07, 2009

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#8 » by kobe24_818 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:09 am

The Lakers should remain as is. Maybe add another shooting big like Dedmon and they'll be fine.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 16,539
And1: 5,973
Joined: Jun 15, 2011

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#10 » by LikeABosh » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:11 am

MindState wrote:
iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.


Image

Bruh. :lol:

Its a wrap. A 58 year old LeBron aint beating that Nets team. I dont know what else to tell you.


Trying alil too hard there
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 16,539
And1: 5,973
Joined: Jun 15, 2011

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#11 » by LikeABosh » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:11 am

They should consider anything that's on the table (besides trading LeBron/AD), but they don't need to make a move
LakersSoul
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,508
And1: 3,771
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#12 » by LakersSoul » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:12 am

akula1488 wrote:Should they try to get a two way, backcourt star that can handle and create the ball with good outside shooting? Basically an upgrade over Shoreder. Ideal PG would be Kyle Lowry but he is already 34 (price would be cheaper). Basketball wise, Lowry + Lebron + AD would be an amazing trio. If not Lowry, who else they can try to target?


Nope.

Lakers are dandy just as they are. If anything, we can add another role player, athletic center during the TD or when waived.

The Lakers only need repetition and gelling time. Let everyone else try to counter the Lakers. We good.

"LeBron + AD to rule the West.
Return of the King, the Lakers."
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 18,806
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#13 » by iamworthy » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:12 am

MindState wrote:
iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.


Image

Bruh. :lol:

Its a wrap. A 58 year old LeBron aint beating that Nets team. I dont know what else to tell you.


You don't have to say anything more, I understand.
Image
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 12,956
And1: 5,546
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#14 » by Catchall » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:12 am

Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.

Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 39,752
And1: 26,246
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#15 » by Sedale Threatt » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:14 am

iamworthy wrote:
MindState wrote:
iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.


Image

Bruh. :lol:

Its a wrap. A 58 year old LeBron aint beating that Nets team. I dont know what else to tell you.


You don't have to say anything more, I understand.


Pack it up, baby. We're done. :(
"I’m intelligent. Some people would say I’m very, very, very intelligent." - Donald Trump

"Suck it, and keep on sucking" - Diego Maradona
LakersSoul
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,508
And1: 3,771
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#16 » by LakersSoul » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:14 am

bstein14 wrote:Kuzma on that contract has zero trade value. If he signed a cheaper deal then sure I could see some teams have interest maybe.

They emptied the chamber to get Davis. KCP has some value but not sure anyone gives up more than what he is worth to the Lakers.


Why would we consider trading away useful players like Kuzma and KCP? They accept their roles and are performing well.

Both scoring and playing good D.

"LeBron + AD to rule the West.
Return of the King, the Lakers."
GYK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,577
And1: 1,656
Joined: Oct 08, 2014
       

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#17 » by GYK » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:14 am

Idk what kind of star they can get. But I do know Zach Lavine is a fantastic third. Just between spot up shooting and floor running he’s 15ppg.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 51,658
And1: 13,768
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
     

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#18 » by FNQ » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:16 am

I mean why even bother? Nets have clearly won 2021 NBA championship. No asterisk. This one legitimately counts. Lakers just oughta rebuild TBH. Sell high before the Nets play a game and the whole league realizes they're cooked
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 18,806
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#19 » by iamworthy » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:16 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:
iamworthy wrote:
MindState wrote:
Image

Bruh. :lol:

Its a wrap. A 58 year old LeBron aint beating that Nets team. I dont know what else to tell you.


You don't have to say anything more, I understand.


Pack it up, baby. We're done. :(


:cry: :lol:
Image
LakersSoul
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,508
And1: 3,771
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Should the Lakers trade their depth/future for a 3rd star to counter Net's move? 

Post#20 » by LakersSoul » Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:16 am

Catchall wrote:Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.

Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.


The problem is there is only 1 ball and all 3 need the ball in their hands. Image the ego battles between Kyrie and Harden then KD does his passive aggressive stuff.

What a circus that will become. Who is going to play D and who is going to defend the rim now? The loss of Allen is HUGE!!

"LeBron + AD to rule the West.
Return of the King, the Lakers."

Return to The General Board