Goudelock wrote:HomoSapien wrote:In OP’s defense, he still has 7 years to go before he’s wrong. Let’s give him a chance.
When Poku wins MVP, my victory lap will be legendary.
In Chyna
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Goudelock wrote:HomoSapien wrote:In OP’s defense, he still has 7 years to go before he’s wrong. Let’s give him a chance.
When Poku wins MVP, my victory lap will be legendary.
AleksandarN wrote:Goudelock wrote:HomoSapien wrote:In OP’s defense, he still has 7 years to go before he’s wrong. Let’s give him a chance.
When Poku wins MVP, my victory lap will be legendary.
In Chyna
dirkforpres wrote:OKC2008 wrote:dirkforpres wrote:
The problem with Presti's plan is that when you have too many assets, you have to eventually start cutting actual good players and assets because theres just no room.
He wont be unemployed long. I hope Dallas takes a gamble.
Poku was trash even when Okc hadn’t any asset on the field
Maybe. But its still surprising that he couldnt find a buyer while hes still on a rookie contract. Even if hes flawed, he's still healthy (currently) and started in half of the games he played in. I wouldve thought some team out there wouldve taken a flyer at the expense of some SRPs anyway, or even as a throw in for the Hayward trade.
dirkforpres wrote:
The problem with Presti's plan is that when you have too many assets, you have to eventually start cutting actual good players and assets because theres just no room.
He wont be unemployed long. I hope Dallas takes a gamble.
dirkforpres wrote:OKC2008 wrote:dirkforpres wrote:
The problem with Presti's plan is that when you have too many assets, you have to eventually start cutting actual good players and assets because theres just no room.
He wont be unemployed long. I hope Dallas takes a gamble.
Poku was trash even when Okc hadn’t any asset on the field
Maybe. But its still surprising that he couldnt find a buyer while hes still on a rookie contract. Even if hes flawed, he's still healthy (currently) and started in half of the games he played in. I wouldve thought some team out there wouldve taken a flyer at the expense of some SRPs anyway, or even as a throw in for the Hayward trade.
Sixers in 4 wrote:dirkforpres wrote:OKC2008 wrote:Poku was trash even when Okc hadn’t any asset on the field
Maybe. But its still surprising that he couldnt find a buyer while hes still on a rookie contract. Even if hes flawed, he's still healthy (currently) and started in half of the games he played in. I wouldve thought some team out there wouldve taken a flyer at the expense of some SRPs anyway, or even as a throw in for the Hayward trade.
He is an RFA after this year. He has no value. We got 2 2nds for Noel and at the time he was viewed as much more of an asset.
He should have been moved earlier but the people freaking out here are funny. He was the 17th overall pick they fail all the time. Not that Poku has failed I believe he is still going to have an NBA career but the fact he never built on the promise of his rookie year.
Ayt wrote:Sixers in 4 wrote:dirkforpres wrote:
Maybe. But its still surprising that he couldnt find a buyer while hes still on a rookie contract. Even if hes flawed, he's still healthy (currently) and started in half of the games he played in. I wouldve thought some team out there wouldve taken a flyer at the expense of some SRPs anyway, or even as a throw in for the Hayward trade.
He is an RFA after this year. He has no value. We got 2 2nds for Noel and at the time he was viewed as much more of an asset.
He should have been moved earlier but the people freaking out here are funny. He was the 17th overall pick they fail all the time. Not that Poku has failed I believe he is still going to have an NBA career but the fact he never built on the promise of his rookie year.
Eh, I don't know if he should have been moved earlier. He had a clear opportunity as a backup big entering the season, and he blew it. I don't see any reason why OKC should have given up on him prior to the season starting.
Ayt wrote:Sixers in 4 wrote:dirkforpres wrote:
Maybe. But its still surprising that he couldnt find a buyer while hes still on a rookie contract. Even if hes flawed, he's still healthy (currently) and started in half of the games he played in. I wouldve thought some team out there wouldve taken a flyer at the expense of some SRPs anyway, or even as a throw in for the Hayward trade.
He is an RFA after this year. He has no value. We got 2 2nds for Noel and at the time he was viewed as much more of an asset.
He should have been moved earlier but the people freaking out here are funny. He was the 17th overall pick they fail all the time. Not that Poku has failed I believe he is still going to have an NBA career but the fact he never built on the promise of his rookie year.
Eh, I don't know if he should have been moved earlier. He had a clear opportunity as a backup big entering the season, and he blew it. I don't see any reason why OKC should have given up on him prior to the season starting.
Goudelock wrote:HomoSapien wrote:In OP’s defense, he still has 7 years to go before he’s wrong. Let’s give him a chance.
When Poku wins MVP, my victory lap will be legendary.