FMVP vs MVP
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
FMVP vs MVP
-
- Junior
- Posts: 273
- And1: 229
- Joined: Jul 05, 2019
- Location: Spain
-
FMVP vs MVP
This is easy... what's more valuable/what's a better achivement for a player? MVP of the regular season or MVP of the finals (normally if you win this is because you won the NBA title too...). Pick one!
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 871
- And1: 1,277
- Joined: Dec 27, 2017
Re: FMVP vs MVP
Andre Iguodala is a FMVP.
That should be the end of this argument.
That should be the end of this argument.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,703
- And1: 10,271
- Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Re: FMVP vs MVP
Both are narrative driven awards, so I don't put much -if any- stock in either. But MVP is won during an 82 games timespan, it allows much less statistical aberration and flukish performance. It's also not matchup dependant. Give me MVP over FMVP any day.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,555
- And1: 3,229
- Joined: Jul 26, 2014
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
I'll take the FMVP because it most likely means I'm wearing a new, shiny ring. It also means you came up big in the biggest moment of the season.
"It's scarier than Charles Barkley at an all you can eat buffet." --Shaq on Shark Week
"My secret to getting rebounds? It's called go get the damn ball." --Charles Barkley
"My secret to getting rebounds? It's called go get the damn ball." --Charles Barkley
Re: FMVP vs MVP
- floppymoose
- Senior Mod - Warriors
- Posts: 59,359
- And1: 17,480
- Joined: Jun 22, 2003
- Location: Trust your election workers
Re: FMVP vs MVP
1. Championship
2. MVP (101 voters)
3. FMVP (11 voters)
2. MVP (101 voters)
3. FMVP (11 voters)
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,550
- And1: 27,275
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: FMVP vs MVP
SkyHookFTW wrote:I'll take the FMVP because it most likely means I'm wearing a new, shiny ring. It also means you came up big in the biggest moment of the season.
You have to separate the title from the award. The title was a team effort. The award says you had a good 4-7 games in what may have been the toughest series but in most years likely wasn't.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,550
- And1: 27,275
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: FMVP vs MVP
The nba really needs to move to a playoff's MVP as that would be something. The finals MVP is just a dumb concept and it's voted on by too few people and it's voted on during one of the at most 7 games so the voters haven't even put any thought into it.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,963
- And1: 11,273
- Joined: Jul 17, 2008
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
FMVP is a joke--too often, the award is won in one game taken out of context. Not even going to bring up the obvious example (2015). Let's look at 2018.
There was only one semi critical game in the 2018 NBA Finals--Game 1. As you'll remember, it went into overtime. Curry and KD put up the following numbers in that crucial game:
Stephen Curry 29/6/9 (.607 TS%, .587 eFG%)
Kevin Durant 29/9/6 (.492 TS%, .386 eFG%)
Again, this was the only game the Cavs really put up a fight. The series was basically over after this first game...and Curry was better.
In Game 2, it was Curry who led the team in the 4th quarter when things got somewhat close, scoring 16 of his 33 points in the final period. Curry and KD put up the following numbers in that game:
Stephen Curry 33/7/8 (.614 TS%, .596 eFG%)
Kevin Durant 26/9/7 (.825 TS%, .786 eFG%)
Pretty good, I'd say.
None of the other games were close. Curry had exactly one (1) "bad" game in the 2018 NBA Finals--Game 3--a game never in question, by the way. KD, however, did very well in this game and the next--great stats--but the Cavs were already beaten.
I think most people agree that KD's gaudy stats in Game 3 "won" him that award. This said, given that it was Curry who shined in the "contested" moments, was KD really the most valuable player in that finals? Very debatable.
Give me the regular season MVP award any day. Yes, this award is also a popularity contest, but given that you need to demonstrate superior achievement over a much broader time period, it seems somewhat more substantial, in my opinion.
There was only one semi critical game in the 2018 NBA Finals--Game 1. As you'll remember, it went into overtime. Curry and KD put up the following numbers in that crucial game:
Stephen Curry 29/6/9 (.607 TS%, .587 eFG%)
Kevin Durant 29/9/6 (.492 TS%, .386 eFG%)
Again, this was the only game the Cavs really put up a fight. The series was basically over after this first game...and Curry was better.
In Game 2, it was Curry who led the team in the 4th quarter when things got somewhat close, scoring 16 of his 33 points in the final period. Curry and KD put up the following numbers in that game:
Stephen Curry 33/7/8 (.614 TS%, .596 eFG%)
Kevin Durant 26/9/7 (.825 TS%, .786 eFG%)
Pretty good, I'd say.
None of the other games were close. Curry had exactly one (1) "bad" game in the 2018 NBA Finals--Game 3--a game never in question, by the way. KD, however, did very well in this game and the next--great stats--but the Cavs were already beaten.
I think most people agree that KD's gaudy stats in Game 3 "won" him that award. This said, given that it was Curry who shined in the "contested" moments, was KD really the most valuable player in that finals? Very debatable.
Give me the regular season MVP award any day. Yes, this award is also a popularity contest, but given that you need to demonstrate superior achievement over a much broader time period, it seems somewhat more substantial, in my opinion.
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,963
- And1: 11,273
- Joined: Jul 17, 2008
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
dhsilv2 wrote:The nba really needs to move to a playoff's MVP as that would be something. The finals MVP is just a dumb concept and it's voted on by too few people and it's voted on during one of the at most 7 games so the voters haven't even put any thought into it.
See, I'd really be behind the bit in bold--playoffs MVP not FMVP--as this would more likely reward the player who really did the most to get his team to the championship.
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,550
- And1: 27,275
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: FMVP vs MVP
taikibansei wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:The nba really needs to move to a playoff's MVP as that would be something. The finals MVP is just a dumb concept and it's voted on by too few people and it's voted on during one of the at most 7 games so the voters haven't even put any thought into it.
See, I'd really be behind the bit in bold--playoffs MVP not FMVP--as this would more likely reward the player who really did the most to get his team to the championship.
Yeah, I'm not sure how the league didn't fix the finals MVP after 1981 where in back to back years Magic won it over Kareem and Maxwell over Bird. At that point it was clearly a broken concept and they just keep moving forward.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,104
- And1: 3,913
- Joined: Oct 04, 2018
Re: FMVP vs MVP
MVP, but i don't care much about either one. I'd like to see a playoff MVP instead of FMVP I'd weigh that a good bit.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 767
- And1: 541
- Joined: Apr 30, 2018
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
I voted FMVP. Yes, Iggy and Maxwell have won FMVP. So? Derrick Rose and Westbrook won season MVPs.
Here is how I see it- Barkley and Iverson would trade their season MVP for a FMVP in a heartbeat. I doubt any FMVPs would trade theirs for a season MVP.
Here is how I see it- Barkley and Iverson would trade their season MVP for a FMVP in a heartbeat. I doubt any FMVPs would trade theirs for a season MVP.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
- AbeVigodaLive
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,000
- And1: 7,384
- Joined: Nov 24, 2008
Re: FMVP vs MVP
TaylorTRoom wrote:
Here is how I see it- Barkley and Iverson would trade their season MVP for a FMVP in a heartbeat. I doubt any FMVPs would trade theirs for a season MVP.
It's about winning the title... not about winning the FMVP.
So if you want to write... "Championship > MVP = Championship > FMVP" you might have a point.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
- Impuniti
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,885
- And1: 7,809
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: FMVP vs MVP
TaylorTRoom wrote:I voted FMVP. Yes, Iggy and Maxwell have won FMVP. So? Derrick Rose and Westbrook won season MVPs.
Here is how I see it- Barkley and Iverson would trade their season MVP for a FMVP in a heartbeat. I doubt any FMVPs would trade theirs for a season MVP.
They would trade because the FMVP also brings in a championship, which is more important than any individual trophy. That's why they would do it, not because the FMVP is worth more.

Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,071
- And1: 2,025
- Joined: Nov 27, 2015
- Location: Russia
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
loveandbeer wrote:Andre Iguodala is a FMVP.
That should be the end of this argument.
Kawhi or Westbrook?
Sixers fan since 2001. From Russia.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,830
- And1: 10,471
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
FMVP implies a championship, and that is the only reason it gets votes. If the question was: "MVP plus the championship" vs "FMVP plus the championship," then MVP clearly wins out.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
- cupcakesnake
- Senior Mod- WNBA
- Posts: 15,625
- And1: 32,124
- Joined: Jul 21, 2016
-
Re: FMVP vs MVP
sixers4real wrote:loveandbeer wrote:Andre Iguodala is a FMVP.
That should be the end of this argument.
Kawhi or Westbrook?
Yeah we can compare the most notable bad exceptions:
Finals MVP: Iggy, Parker (over Duncan), Billups (over Ben), Kawhi (over Duncan I guess), Cedric Maxwell, Worthy, Pierce
MVP: Iverson, Rose, Westbrook
In general we'd like to see the award reflect the best player, and that doesn't always happen. For FMVP, it's a snap shot of a single playoff series. It ignores the 3 playoff series that it took to get there (and obviously the regular season). The kinda opposite problem occurs for MVP, where it rewards a player who participates at the highest level in the marathon slog of the regular season, even if that player isn't even in the handful of elite players that tilt championship odds.
I wish they'd turn FMVP into playoff MVP. I think that would fix any problems we have with that award. MVP is harder.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."
Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,550
- And1: 27,275
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: FMVP vs MVP
TaylorTRoom wrote:I voted FMVP. Yes, Iggy and Maxwell have won FMVP. So? Derrick Rose and Westbrook won season MVPs.
Here is how I see it- Barkley and Iverson would trade their season MVP for a FMVP in a heartbeat. I doubt any FMVPs would trade theirs for a season MVP.
There's no way they'd trade their MVP for a jerry west style finals MVP.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,975
- And1: 2,294
- Joined: Jun 14, 2017
Re: FMVP vs MVP
Both are outdated.
MVP should be who was the most valuable player. Not who was the best player on one of the better teams. And not heavily narrative driven.
Finals MVP should be a Playoff MVP.
MVP should be who was the most valuable player. Not who was the best player on one of the better teams. And not heavily narrative driven.
Finals MVP should be a Playoff MVP.
Re: FMVP vs MVP
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,484
- And1: 2,190
- Joined: Jun 08, 2019
Re: FMVP vs MVP
FMVP should be changed to playoffs MVP, if you put your team on your back for 4 rounds and take them to a championship it has more weight than just 1 round. That way we wouldn’t see decisions like Iquodala over Curry and it would give a more accurate picture of the true mvp for the Championship team.