RealGM

If I’m Pelinka I would seriously consider it. It’s better to get rid of a player early then a year to late plus Lebron and Westbrick don’t fit. Bill Belichick does this all the time. Some sucker would give up the house for him. I would offer Boston Lebron for Tatum and a couple of picks. Who says no?

No

Would you have created this thread if the Lakers lost to the Spurs instead of having to comeback and squeeze one out today? Just a ridiculous thread lol.

Ok who would you trade him for ? Omg hahaha ..

Currygoat wrote:If I’m Pelinka I would seriously consider it. It’s better to get rid of a player early then a year to late plus Lebron and Westbrick don’t fit. Bill Belichick does this all the time. Some sucker would give up the house for him. I would offer Boston Lebron for Tatum and a couple of picks. Who says no?

Lakers and the state of CA.

Ballerhogger wrote:Ok who would you trade him for ? Omg hahaha ..

I would offer Boston Lebron for Tatum and a couple of picks. Who says no?

Brad Stevens would laugh himself into a coma if that kind of deal was proposed.

Dude...If Boston gives us Tatum AND PICKS....Hell yes i would do it.

infinite11285 wrote:

Ballerhogger wrote:Ok who would you trade him for ? Omg hahaha ..

I would offer Boston Lebron for Tatum and a couple of picks. Who says no?

Brad Stevens would laugh himself into a coma if that kind of deal was proposed.

I’ll admit I didn’t read the op at first .

Only for Giannis, 2 swaps, 2 first, the Clippers, cash, and maybe Ben Simmons thrown into the deal.

Lakers are never going to trade Lebron.
Even if Boston decided to offer Tatum and picks.

But i mean.... That would be the move to make since I personally give this current Lakers big 3 only this season as their chance for the chip.
Tatum and AD line up real well.

I wonder how rich the value would have to be for the Lakers to have the balls to trade Lebron.
Giannis?
Luka and picks?
Tatum and brown?

They should trade Lebron because they were able to squeak out a win against the lottery bound Spurs?

Loneshot wrote:Only for Giannis, 2 swaps, 2 first, the Clippers, cash, and maybe Ben Simmons thrown into the deal.

You wouldn't trade a 37 year old Lebron for Tatum and picks? Might just be me feeling this is the year he's falling off. Probably wrong and he'll make me eat dirt. Which i wlll happily do.

Wait a second, you're not Pharmcat...

Lakers should consider it, could get some nice pieces to round out an already strong roster, seem better without him, Westbrook & Davis went off tonight.

Davis
35pts 17rebs 4asts 4blks

Westbrook
33pts 10rebs 8asts 3stls

He’s not bringing much to the Lakers with this type of effort..



Stop posting the same IG meme in every LeBron-related thread.

We’re hanging up the phone if it’s anything less than Tatum and Brown.

Kobe187 wrote:Lakers should consider it, could get some nice pieces to round out an already strong roster, seem better without him, Westbrook & Davis went off tonight.

Davis
35pts 17rebs 4asts 4blks

Westbrook
33pts 10rebs 8asts 3stls

He’s not bringing much to the Lakers with this type of effort..

Spoiler:

Stop posting the same IG meme in every LeBron-related thread.

Stop it. 4 games into the season and we still judging Lebron this early? WB does not have 1/3 the impact Lebron has on this team. If anything Russ should take reins of the second unit. Only trade i would take is if we get Tatum.

Kobe187 wrote:Lakers should consider it, could get some nice pieces to round out an already strong roster, seem better without him, Westbrook & Davis went off tonight.

Davis
35pts 17rebs 4asts 4blks

Westbrook
33pts 10rebs 8asts 3stls

He’s not bringing much to the Lakers with this type of effort..

Spoiler:

Stop posting the same IG meme in every LeBron-related thread.

I was disagreeing with you until I saw you post that still image for the second time. That changed my mind.

Ok sure. Mavs will accept a Lebron for Doncic deal right?

If the Lakers are offered Tatum for LeBron you take it and run! One is Veteran with a year or 2 left, the other is a rising star that will give you a decade of good basketball, it’s a no brainer for the Lakers (Celtics would never do it).