- Posts: 42,737
- And1: 11,560
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
- Location: Brought to you by the Splash Fam
Man that's a turrible call. They never call the forearm to the head of opponents, so this call must have been for the defender getting there in time, which he clearly did not by the time Edwards had made his move.
What a shame.
What a shame.
Little Digger wrote:Can the Warriors file a lawsuit against Oubre?
- Posts: 11,661
- And1: 5,200
- Joined: Dec 14, 2006
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,947
- And1: 10,328
- Joined: May 06, 2018
The disrespect, grabbing the mans head on that dunk. Lol. Thats the most soul crushing dunk I've seen in a long while.
Signed with team T.W.O for the 2021-22 season.
- Posts: 10,710
- And1: 2,424
- Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Domejandro wrote:Lockdown504090 wrote:how isnt that a charge?
You cannot slide under an offensive player once they leave the ground.
If you pause the video and scrub it you can see the defender did not slide under Edwards before he left the ground. His left foot was planted and he actually moves his right foot backwards, and he was not under or moving under Edwards when he left the ground.
That said, it was a great dunk and should not have been a charge.
- Posts: 1,118
- And1: 3,451
- Joined: Apr 28, 2017
Pau Gasol punching air right now after how Blake murdered him back in the day. You let these plays go on IMO
- Posts: 3,142
- And1: 2,777
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
jpengland wrote:To be fair to the referee, the defender gets set a fraction too late and Edwards is in the air so long that it looks like a charge. Edwards doesn't help himself pushing off the face, either.
Wrong call and ruined a great play, but I get it
looks more like edwards is just protecting his kids. defender's head shouldn't have been there in the first place.
screw these absolute garbage refs