hardenASG13 wrote:th87 wrote:battifole wrote:Considering the Nets were down 2 of their 3 stars including one of them being a realgm favorite, its amusing seeing some stars (Giannis) get propped up when anyone who saw that series could only come to one conclusion - the Nets were clearly the better team and it took injuries (including a Giannis undercut of Kyrie) and KD's foot to stave off what was a beat down the first two games which were done so without Harden.
But when the shoe is on the other foot (and its not like Giannis was down BOTH middleton and jrue), the excuses and 'context' comes out.
In a lot of the PC board comparisons, we always see players get excused for failures out of their control. But that only applies to realgm favorites, and the whipping boys are given no such benefit of the doubt even when its layed bare for everyone to see.
Bucks were cruising to a win when Kyrie got injured. I do like how that injury becomes earlier and earlier in the series.
Not at all. They got up double digits in game 4 and Brooklyn were the ones settling in. They were only down 4, second quarter, when Kyrie got hurt. Which is typically how it goes when the better team (that won the first 2) is about to take a game 4 road game and.close it out in 5 or 6.
Bucks spotted the nets two then slapped them silly. God that felt good to watch. Hey, how did the nets do this year?