basketballRob wrote:azcatz11 wrote:jasonxxx102 wrote:
Do you understand how those are calculated?
Hey - here’s random advanced stats which prove why one player is better than another. It’s so dumb
Franz is in the top 40 in all those advanced stats. Do you think any Allstars are out of the top 40? Your claim that Mobley is better and outside the 200 in so many advanced stats is puzzling.
Sent from my SM-G781U using
RealGM mobile app
You are comparing two players with vastly different roles using advanced stats. That’s what’s puzzling.
A guy who is the first option on offense or even the second (I’m not sure which criteria Franz falls under) is almost always going to have greater advanced stats. That’s just how it works. Advanced stats are meant to help give more in depth analysis on how great a player is, but just like with any other stat, it’s useless if you aren’t factoring in context.
I’ve said multiple times that Mobleys numbers are very misleading due to the kind of team he’s on. Mitchell and Garland are both taking shot opportunities away from him and Allen is the one spending the most time in the middle, which takes rebounding opportunities away from him (and blocks to an extent).
This is one of those cases where unless you are watching both players regularly, you are in no position to truly say which one is better. And stats aren’t going to do a good job telling that story either.
With all of that said, Mobleys 38 point outing has been eye opening for a lot of people. But it didn’t surprise me at all. What also didn’t surprise me is how many people tried to downplay it. Mobleys improved tremendously at moving with the ball and attacking the rim. His drop step and post up game is actually scary good and he’s even started to turn a corner with free throws. Keep in mind that he’s doing this on a team that regularly lacks spacing, resulting in the paint being more packed with defenders.
So while I’m not going to openly state that Mobley is better than Franz, what I will say is that if Mitchell wasn’t on the team and Mobley was the second option, we probably wouldn’t even be having this debate right now. I will also say that you guys are horribly underrating Mobley right now, and as long as his scoring options continue to be limited, his offense will continue to be overlooked. If there was no Mitchell, I’m 90% certain Mobley would be averaging 20/10, if not more. Would you still have the same opinion at that point?