RealGM

This is according to the AP, from nba.com

Apparently, Kemp was acting in self-defense. I knew the story of a drive-by shooting made absolutely no sense. Nobody does a drive-by and then stays to talk to the police.

From the article:

In a written statement, another Kemp attorney, W. Scott Boatman, said Kemp’s vehicle was broken into Tuesday night and several items were taken — including an iPhone. Kemp tracked the phone’s location to an occupied car at the Tacoma Mall, and when Kemp confronted the individuals inside, they shot at him, and he returned fire, Boatright said.

“There was not a drive by shooting as previously reported and Mr. Kemp’s actions were reasonable and legally justified,” Boatman said. “Mr. Kemp met with law enforcement at the scene in an attempt to assist in the matter.”

Saul Goodman

Of course he was. I said there was more to this story immediately and people jumped on his throat like he’s an actual criminal. Good to see common sense prevail in Washington st

Once I tracked the phone's location I would think the best move would be to call the police. I don't know, maybe they wouldn't be useful but I'd rather they be the ones to confront potentially dangerous criminals since it's supposedly their job.

I'm really glad though to see this clarification. 53 year old Shawn Kemp performing a drive-by really did make no sense at all.

rand wrote:Once I tracked the phone's location I would think the best move would be to call the police. I don't know, maybe they wouldn't be useful but I'd rather they be the ones to confront potentially dangerous criminals since it's supposedly their job.

I'm really glad though to see this clarification. 53 year old Shawn Kemp performing a drive-by really did make no sense at all.

The police will not show to crimes like these anymore. He had no choice

rand wrote:Once I tracked the phone's location I would think the best move would be to call the police. I don't know, maybe they wouldn't be useful but I'd rather they be the ones to confront potentially dangerous criminals since it's supposedly their job.

I'm really glad though to see this clarification. 53 year old Shawn Kemp performing a drive-by really did make no sense at all.

It's possibly a morally damned if you do damned if you don't situation.

Maybe his intent was to confront who'd done it to give them grace and hope they learn a lesson vs getting the law involved and said person (especially if they're a young troubled kid or young adult) gets an arrest record that potentially contributes to them ruining their life.

In this case it could've been Kemp losing his life over an iPhone and other items.

For laughs tho that phone must've had some incriminating info or pics on that phone to go MacGruber to trace and get it back

Glad no one is injured and hope they find the thieves if they already haven't.

azcatz11 wrote:The police will not show to crimes like these anymore. He had no choice

Or what he said ^

You love to see it. A free man exercising his right to self-defense. Go forth and prosper, Reignman.

Castle Black wrote:You love to see it. A free man exercising his right to self-defense. Go forth and prosper, Reignman.

Vigilantes forever.

Wish the media would run with this good news as fast as they ran with that bad news about him. Best of luck to the RainMan

I hope Kemp can use his time now back in the media to promote his businesses.

azcatz11 wrote:

rand wrote:Once I tracked the phone's location I would think the best move would be to call the police. I don't know, maybe they wouldn't be useful but I'd rather they be the ones to confront potentially dangerous criminals since it's supposedly their job.

I'm really glad though to see this clarification. 53 year old Shawn Kemp performing a drive-by really did make no sense at all.

The police will not show to crimes like these anymore. He had no choice

Then those people will respond: "Get a new phone"

EmperorLocky wrote:I hope Kemp can use his time now back in the media to promote his businesses.

I believe he started the first black owned dispensary in Tacoma

Wait...why was he in jail at all?

If these are the facts then it was obviously self defense....the cops couldn’t take a statement without locking him up?

CobraCommander wrote:Wait...why was he in jail at all?

If these are the facts then it was obviously self defense....the cops couldn’t take a statement without locking him up?

C'mon, they had to hold him while they investigate. You want them to let everyone who shoots somebody go free while they find out what happened? Really?

xdrta+ wrote:

CobraCommander wrote:Wait...why was he in jail at all?

If these are the facts then it was obviously self defense....the cops couldn’t take a statement without locking him up?

C'mon, they had to hold him while they investigate. You want them to let everyone who shoots somebody go free while they find out what happened? Really?

No...but if the facts are this straight forward...yeah.

What do you think they learned in two days that they couldn’t validate that day?

That’s a serious question.

This doesn’t seem like trying to figure out what happened in oceans 11.



Cop: Did you steal Shawn’s phone

Criminal: well kinda sorta...but...

Cop: but what? did you realize that the phones owner was Shawn ReignMan Kemp...?

Criminal: hell naw...I love Shawn Kemp but when he came at me in panicked and started shooting...

Cop: and then what happened...

criminal: Shawn started putting shots up

xdrta+ wrote:

CobraCommander wrote:Wait...why was he in jail at all?

If these are the facts then it was obviously self defense....the cops couldn’t take a statement without locking him up?

C'mon, they had to hold him while they investigate. You want them to let everyone who shoots somebody go free while they find out what happened? Really?

You can lock people up legally for a period of 48 hours before proving a crime was committed.

In this case - the cops jumped the gun and charged him with a felony right off the bat when the evidence was clear as day.

Hopefully he sues the crap out of the Tacoma PD

azcatz11 wrote:

xdrta+ wrote:

CobraCommander wrote:Wait...why was he in jail at all?

If these are the facts then it was obviously self defense....the cops couldn’t take a statement without locking him up?

C'mon, they had to hold him while they investigate. You want them to let everyone who shoots somebody go free while they find out what happened? Really?

You can lock people up legally for a period of 48 hours before proving a crime was committed.

In this case - the cops jumped the gun and charged him with a felony right off the bat when the evidence was clear as day.

Hopefully he sues the crap out of the Tacoma PD

Why would he sue them when what they did was legal?

xdrta+ wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:

xdrta+ wrote:
C'mon, they had to hold him while they investigate. You want them to let everyone who shoots somebody go free while they find out what happened? Really?

You can lock people up legally for a period of 48 hours before proving a crime was committed.

In this case - the cops jumped the gun and charged him with a felony right off the bat when the evidence was clear as day.

Hopefully he sues the crap out of the Tacoma PD

Why would he sue them when what they did was legal?

Why are you charging him with a felony while you working to figure out what happened? This BS....self defense and firing a gun in self defense isn’t a felony - and you don’t just charge someone while you investigate OR a lot of cops would he charged...and rightfully we not charging cops while we investigate

CobraCommander wrote:

xdrta+ wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:
You can lock people up legally for a period of 48 hours before proving a crime was committed.

In this case - the cops jumped the gun and charged him with a felony right off the bat when the evidence was clear as day.

Hopefully he sues the crap out of the Tacoma PD

Why would he sue them when what they did was legal?

Why are you charging him with a felony while you working to figure out what happened? This BS....self defense and firing a gun in self defense isn’t a felony - and you don’t just charge someone while you investigate OR a lot of cops would he charged...and rightfully we not charging cops while we investigate

His reputation is tarnished. You can’t just go around throwing felonies at people - like you said. Thank god he has enough money for good attorneys. This is how normal people get completely screwed

azcatz11 wrote:

CobraCommander wrote:

xdrta+ wrote:
Why would he sue them when what they did was legal?

Why are you charging him with a felony while you working to figure out what happened? This BS....self defense and firing a gun in self defense isn’t a felony - and you don’t just charge someone while you investigate OR a lot of cops would he charged...and rightfully we not charging cops while we investigate

His reputation is tarnished. You can’t just go around throwing felonies at people - like you said. Thank god he has enough money for good attorneys. This is how normal people get completely screwed

Hope those thieves get attempted murder charges for firing first and spend at least 20 in prison in the Pacific Northwest where Kemp is beloved....