Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 32,965
And1: 36,391
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#1 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:51 pm

I know that ZIon is out, Ingram was injured too, but this team seemed to be really deep and could carry themselves in games early in the season, but they just fallen apart. Is it all acceptable and understandable or are they really crapping their pantaloons here in 2023? What is up with them? I have seen stat that ZIon is averaging 28.5 games per season so far in his career, is this rebuild sustainable or is it fools gold?
User avatar
Ito
General Manager
Posts: 9,536
And1: 988
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Location: UPTOWN, NY

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#2 » by Ito » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:17 pm

Not like they was Gon win anything but yeah I guess it's not acceptable a team like jazz and okc are doing better right now in the standings.. wolves and pelicans should have been at least a lock for the play-in by now
Image
User avatar
kingr
Head Coach
Posts: 6,904
And1: 3,149
Joined: Aug 03, 2006

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#3 » by kingr » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:18 pm

Zion was dominating early in the season. They were a top 3 team in the west if I remember correctly. He was that good, they were even winning games without BI. So i'm not surprised they have dropped when Zion got hurt.
User avatar
KyRo23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,275
And1: 15,248
Joined: May 07, 2017
   

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#4 » by KyRo23 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:21 pm

Pick swap pick swap pick swap!
User avatar
donemilio21
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 848
Joined: Aug 20, 2009
Location: Santa Barbara
   

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#5 » by donemilio21 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:26 pm

KyRo23 wrote:Pick swap pick swap pick swap!

Pelicans have the right to swap picks with Lakers. Not the other way around. They have identical records and if both teams end up in the lottery, they'd have doubled their chance to get a top 3 pick. Still not great odds. So there is a little positive of them not being even mediocre without Zion right now. West is pretty stacked anyway.
User avatar
KyRo23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,275
And1: 15,248
Joined: May 07, 2017
   

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#6 » by KyRo23 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:38 pm

donemilio21 wrote:
KyRo23 wrote:Pick swap pick swap pick swap!

Pelicans have the right to swap picks with Lakers. Not the other way around. They have identical records and if both teams end up in the lottery, they'd have doubled their chance to get a top 3 pick. Still not great odds. So there is a little positive of them not being even mediocre without Zion right now. West is pretty stacked anyway.


Right, for sure. I was just mocking the people who thought LA would have a much worse record
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,183
And1: 61,018
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#7 » by bwgood77 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:39 pm

Yes, it's completely acceptable.
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,858
And1: 12,727
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#8 » by Lockdown504090 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:42 pm

KyRo23 wrote:
donemilio21 wrote:
KyRo23 wrote:Pick swap pick swap pick swap!

Pelicans have the right to swap picks with Lakers. Not the other way around. They have identical records and if both teams end up in the lottery, they'd have doubled their chance to get a top 3 pick. Still not great odds. So there is a little positive of them not being even mediocre without Zion right now. West is pretty stacked anyway.


Right, for sure. I was just mocking the people who thought LA would have a much worse record

its wild to me that we are in the timeline where the lakers could be picking 15th in the draft, take filiposki, leonard miller or dariq whitehead, while still making the playoffs after being bottomfeeders who also had to swap picks with the pelicans who used to be a 2 seed.
ArtMorte
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,672
And1: 2,102
Joined: Jan 15, 2018
   

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#9 » by ArtMorte » Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:54 pm

They need Zion for his scoring, simple as.

Ingram's not good enough to be the number one option in a playoff team. And turns out that McCollum wasn't being held back by playing second fiddle to Lillard, he's good, but nothing amazing.

Side note: I feel like Valanciunas was jinxed by some early-season thread on here, I don't remember was it about him or a bunch of centers in general, but there was a bit of a w*nkfest over him and he's been quite mid ever since.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 32,965
And1: 36,391
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#10 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:01 pm

ArtMorte wrote:They need Zion for his scoring, simple as.

Ingram's not good enough to be the number one option in a playoff team. And turns out that McCollum wasn't being held back by playing second fiddle to Lillard, he's good, but nothing amazing.

Side note: I feel like Valanciunas was jinxed by some early-season thread on here, I don't remember was it about him or a bunch of centers in general, but there was a bit of a w*nkfest over him and he's been quite mid ever since.


Yes, as a big Jonas fan\, I remember, he started very well but him and McCollum just kind of disappeared, Jonas especially.

Jonas is just one of those centers that can score points, but is just not a closign player because of exploitative defensive struggles. THat part to me makes sense but always didnt make sense to me also. If guys like Jonas isnt good for 4th. quarter, why do they play more in first 3 quarters then, as human, I understand the difference, but logically, there is no difference really, you build score over entire game. But no, Jonas will play more in first 3 quarters, will score a lot of points, will give up points, but Larry Nance will sub him in the forth. It always made sense but also didnt make sense at all to me, is it just me?
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,206
And1: 5,916
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#11 » by ConSarnit » Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:22 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
ArtMorte wrote:They need Zion for his scoring, simple as.

Ingram's not good enough to be the number one option in a playoff team. And turns out that McCollum wasn't being held back by playing second fiddle to Lillard, he's good, but nothing amazing.

Side note: I feel like Valanciunas was jinxed by some early-season thread on here, I don't remember was it about him or a bunch of centers in general, but there was a bit of a w*nkfest over him and he's been quite mid ever since.


Yes, as a big Jonas fan\, I remember, he started very well but him and McCollum just kind of disappeared, Jonas especially.

Jonas is just one of those centers that can score points, but is just not a closign player because of exploitative defensive struggles. THat part to me makes sense but always didnt make sense to me also. If guys like Jonas isnt good for 4th. quarter, why do they play more in first 3 quarters then, as human, I understand the difference, but logically, there is no difference really, you build score over entire game. But no, Jonas will play more in first 3 quarters, will score a lot of points, will give up points, but Larry Nance will sub him in the forth. It always made sense but also didnt make sense at all to me, is it just me?


Nance isn't durable enough to play more than 20 min per game. The best version of this team brings JV off the bench or maybe even doesn't even have him at all. He clogs the paint for Zion and can't protect the rim. The fact that Zion can score so efficiently with JV on the floor is a testament to how good Zion is.

Zion with Nance: 14.2 netrtg (119.6 off, 105.4 def)

Zion with JV: 3.9 netrtg (112.8 off, 108.9 def)

Their scoring woes aren't the reason they're losing. Their starting lineup:

CJ/Ingram/Jones/Murphy/JV

107.3 offrtg
127.9 defrtg

-20.6 netrtg

Their starting lineup is basically the worst defensive team of all time.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 32,965
And1: 36,391
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#12 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:30 pm

ConSarnit wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
ArtMorte wrote:They need Zion for his scoring, simple as.

Ingram's not good enough to be the number one option in a playoff team. And turns out that McCollum wasn't being held back by playing second fiddle to Lillard, he's good, but nothing amazing.

Side note: I feel like Valanciunas was jinxed by some early-season thread on here, I don't remember was it about him or a bunch of centers in general, but there was a bit of a w*nkfest over him and he's been quite mid ever since.


Yes, as a big Jonas fan\, I remember, he started very well but him and McCollum just kind of disappeared, Jonas especially.

Jonas is just one of those centers that can score points, but is just not a closign player because of exploitative defensive struggles. THat part to me makes sense but always didnt make sense to me also. If guys like Jonas isnt good for 4th. quarter, why do they play more in first 3 quarters then, as human, I understand the difference, but logically, there is no difference really, you build score over entire game. But no, Jonas will play more in first 3 quarters, will score a lot of points, will give up points, but Larry Nance will sub him in the forth. It always made sense but also didnt make sense at all to me, is it just me?


Nance isn't durable enough to play more than 20 min per game. The best version of this team brings JV off the bench or maybe even doesn't even have him at all. He clogs the paint for Zion and can't protect the rim. The fact that Zion can score so efficiently with JV on the floor is a testament to how good Zion is.

Zion with Nance: 14.2 netrtg (119.6 off, 105.4 def)

Zion with JV: 3.9 netrtg (112.8 off, 108.9 def)

Their scoring woes aren't the reason they're losing. Their starting lineup:

CJ/Ingram/Jones/Murphy/JV

107.3 offrtg
127.9 defrtg

-20.6 netrtg

Their starting lineup is basically the worst defensive team of all time.


Jonas off the bench does make sense. It is crazy to me how good NBA got, to a point such a skillful finisher with such a good touch, size and scoring is basically seen as a scrub in todays game, wow.
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,206
And1: 5,916
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#13 » by ConSarnit » Tue Mar 14, 2023 5:55 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
Yes, as a big Jonas fan\, I remember, he started very well but him and McCollum just kind of disappeared, Jonas especially.

Jonas is just one of those centers that can score points, but is just not a closign player because of exploitative defensive struggles. THat part to me makes sense but always didnt make sense to me also. If guys like Jonas isnt good for 4th. quarter, why do they play more in first 3 quarters then, as human, I understand the difference, but logically, there is no difference really, you build score over entire game. But no, Jonas will play more in first 3 quarters, will score a lot of points, will give up points, but Larry Nance will sub him in the forth. It always made sense but also didnt make sense at all to me, is it just me?


Nance isn't durable enough to play more than 20 min per game. The best version of this team brings JV off the bench or maybe even doesn't even have him at all. He clogs the paint for Zion and can't protect the rim. The fact that Zion can score so efficiently with JV on the floor is a testament to how good Zion is.

Zion with Nance: 14.2 netrtg (119.6 off, 105.4 def)

Zion with JV: 3.9 netrtg (112.8 off, 108.9 def)

Their scoring woes aren't the reason they're losing. Their starting lineup:

CJ/Ingram/Jones/Murphy/JV

107.3 offrtg
127.9 defrtg

-20.6 netrtg

Their starting lineup is basically the worst defensive team of all time.


Jonas off the bench does make sense. It is crazy to me how good NBA got, to a point such a skillful finisher with such a good touch, size and scoring is basically seen as a scrub in todays game, wow.


I don't think he's a scrub at all. He's just a bad fit with Zion. JV has his place as a masher but his flaws just happen to coincide with the things that teams have discovered they can exploit most easily: slow footed 7 footer who can't really protect the rim nor switch on the perimeter. I'd say these guys and non-shooting wings have been hit the hardest the past few years in terms of value around the league.
Hoop Heavy
Rookie
Posts: 1,205
And1: 604
Joined: Sep 05, 2020

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#14 » by Hoop Heavy » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:05 pm

bwgood77 wrote:Yes, it's completely acceptable.



So, a team that loses two of their top three guys ... and then struggles ... and people think that's "acceptable"

IF the Pelicans were for "real" ... then they would have had two guys on the end of the bench who were as good as the two guys they lost, right? 8-)
nikster
RealGM
Posts: 14,436
And1: 12,938
Joined: Sep 08, 2013

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#15 » by nikster » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:10 pm

KyRo23 wrote:
donemilio21 wrote:
KyRo23 wrote:Pick swap pick swap pick swap!

Pelicans have the right to swap picks with Lakers. Not the other way around. They have identical records and if both teams end up in the lottery, they'd have doubled their chance to get a top 3 pick. Still not great odds. So there is a little positive of them not being even mediocre without Zion right now. West is pretty stacked anyway.


Right, for sure. I was just mocking the people who thought LA would have a much worse record

It wasn't that crazy of a thought until they completely revamped the roster and Zion went down. Pelicans were #1 seed at one point and was looking like Lakers had a chance of missing play in all together
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,183
And1: 61,018
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#16 » by bwgood77 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:11 pm

Hoop Heavy wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Yes, it's completely acceptable.



So, a team that loses two of their top three guys ... and then struggles ... and people think that's "acceptable"

IF the Pelicans were for "real" ... then they would have had two guys on the end of the bench who were as good as the two guys they lost, right? 8-)


I think it's just a dumb question. How do you answer it? How good should they be? I remember when the Suns were missing like 6 of their 9 top players this year and struggling everyone was blaming Bridges and Ayton for not carrying 3rd stringers to wins against good teams (and they even took the Nuggets to OT and played some other teams well).

It's tough to judge, but yeah, any team missing it's top 2 players is unlikely to be good unless you have super quality backups like Memphis, who can usually hang since Tyus Jones is probably the best backup PG in the league and they have solid PFs/Guards to backup JJJ or Bane.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 32,965
And1: 36,391
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#17 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:36 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Hoop Heavy wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Yes, it's completely acceptable.



So, a team that loses two of their top three guys ... and then struggles ... and people think that's "acceptable"

IF the Pelicans were for "real" ... then they would have had two guys on the end of the bench who were as good as the two guys they lost, right? 8-)


I think it's just a dumb question. How do you answer it? How good should they be? I remember when the Suns were missing like 6 of their 9 top players this year and struggling everyone was blaming Bridges and Ayton for not carrying 3rd stringers to wins against good teams (and they even took the Nuggets to OT and played some other teams well).

It's tough to judge, but yeah, any team missing it's top 2 players is unlikely to be good unless you have super quality backups like Memphis, who can usually hang since Tyus Jones is probably the best backup PG in the league and they have solid PFs/Guards to backup JJJ or Bane.


You guys are right, maybe I just overrated their ability to do it by committee, I thought they are one of the deepest teams around, and maybe they are but its a star league. At first even without ZIon and Ingram they were looking ok, but then just fell apart. I Mean I guess that was expected, but it was still a bit disappointing to me, I really expected this team to be very good, and yeah, if ZIon plays 25 games a year, this team is nothing, but I dont know, I was going against my character and were over optimistic with this group of players.
User avatar
C3H6N6O6
Analyst
Posts: 3,190
And1: 4,178
Joined: Feb 04, 2014

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#18 » by C3H6N6O6 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:44 pm

No, it is not.
They should be 14-18 since new year. They at least shouldn't have lost so many games recently in which both Mccullum and Ingram played.
User avatar
chilluminati
Analyst
Posts: 3,455
And1: 6,184
Joined: Feb 15, 2021
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#19 » by chilluminati » Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:46 pm

Team is built around Zion.
They lose without him.

Nothing to see here.
Image
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,643
And1: 32,171
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Pelicans are 10-22 since new year, is it acceptable that they've been this bad? 

Post#20 » by cupcakesnake » Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:09 pm

I don't think it's unreasonable to be a bit surprised by how bad they've been considering the run they went on last year without Zion. They went 13-10 to finish the season, won both their play-in games, and then took 2 games off a Phoenix team that made the finals the year before. I remember there even being speculation of Zion coming back being a negative issue.

So I did think this core was going to hold up and play close to .500 basketball when Zion went out and Ingram came back. They had so much depth and had discovered a 2-way identity that was built more around Herb, Dyson, Murphy, Alvarado, and Nance.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast

Return to The General Board