Ein Sof wrote:KrAzY3 wrote:D.Brasco wrote:Don't disagree, but I'm sure he fed his temple with the right supplements in the free wheeling 90s.
I can show a picture of LeBron looking jacked in his late 30s, and LeBron has ties to someone connected to a PED scandal along with playing in a hotbed of PEDs in Miami and having abnormal longevity (Robinson didn't find the fountain of youth late in his career like Barry Bonds or Roger Clemens did).
Nevertheless, he's generally not accused of taking PEDs.
But he is on PEDs, like everyone else.
Also are you joking with that bolded part or what?
I've seen so many GOAT discussions on this forum, and literally zero have had more the the occasionally vague hint into the notion that LeBron is on PEDs. Zero have made that a meaningful part of the discussion. If most people thought LeBron was on PEDs then all the applause he gets for playing late in to his career and so on would be in the least disingenuous because we all saw what PEDs did to extend the career of known cheats like Bonds and Clemens.
It would dominate the conversation, it doesn't. Also, I find it laughable to accuse everyone, regardless of any indication of being on PEDs. If you are going to start accusing people of PEDs you start by looking for two thing, abnormal career arcs (extreme longevity) and/or abnormal/rapid improvements that coincide with a change in musculature. For instance, Roger Clemens struggled some in his mid 30s (expected), then improved and played some of his best baseball into his mid 40s (unexpected). Barry Bonds basically did the same thing, after hitting .262 and 34 home runs at the age of 36, he suddenly became better than ever. When you look for cheating, look for something abnormal in their production. Just being muscular isn't proof.
Neither of those things apply to David Robinson. He was built like that in college, and by his early 30s he was clearly declining, something PEDs could have help stave off.