Celtics vs Thunder

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Who is the better team?

Celtics
75
74%
Thunder
26
26%
 
Total votes: 101

Lo Wang
Rookie
Posts: 1,155
And1: 620
Joined: Jan 07, 2024

Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#1 » by Lo Wang » Fri Nov 1, 2024 2:57 pm

So far the Thunder are blowing out teams by an average of 20 pts. The Celtics are the Celtics: The clear favorite to win it all.

With the way Chet has been playing (demolishing Wemby was insane) and JDub looking like a young Dwade out there, is this Thunder team better than the Celtics?

Thoughts?
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 21,363
And1: 4,579
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#2 » by bluejerseyjinx » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:08 pm

Hell no. Please. I'm on the floor rolling in so much laughter I can't gather a thought at the moment.
Triple M
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 3,467
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: 1994 of an Alternate Universe World Seres Parade
         

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#3 » by Triple M » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:17 pm

On paper i guess you can say the Thunder are the most balanced team. One of their few flaws from last year was their rebounding and they added Hartistein to address the issue.

Their defense has been suffocating because holding opponents under 100 points in this era is impressive. I expect their shooting #s to improve throughout the season so they will a challenge for anyone, but their only weakness is that they only have 1 reliable shot creator. In a playoff setting both Chet and JDub need to be better than last season but that isnt as big of a glaring hole as it used to be in years past. They remind me of a better version of the Jimmy Butler Heat.

If this is the Finals im looking forward to the 2 coaches going at each other. Im looking forward to Tatum vs SGA as a star billing.

Im bias so ill go Celtics and their experience should give them an edge in theory, but i know how good OKC is because i still remember that game they blew us out in OKC by 50 a few seasons ago.
User avatar
Meeksology
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,404
And1: 5,082
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#4 » by Meeksology » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:21 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:Hell no. Please. I'm on the floor rolling in so much laughter I can't gather a thought at the moment.

I wouldnt call it a resounding "hell no" nor would I be ROFL at the question, but until proven otherwise the Celtics are the team to beat. I just dont think its as far-fetched of an outcome if the Thunder do win as you're making it out to be. Though you are a Celtic fan so I can understand the confident post, however smug it is.
Image
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,149
And1: 12,971
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#5 » by brackdan70 » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:25 pm

If everyone is healthy including Porzingis I think the Celtics have an edge.
Without him I could see the Thunder being stronger.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
User avatar
ryan in Maine
Head Coach
Posts: 7,325
And1: 12,614
Joined: Sep 06, 2005
 

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#6 » by ryan in Maine » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:27 pm

Celtics in 6.
UNIONIZE! WITH THE EMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE (EWOC)!
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,717
And1: 11,775
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#7 » by Michael Jackson » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:50 pm

Celtics are the better team until proven otherwise but the Thunder are scary good looking right now. Still nod to the Celtics they have proven it.
Lo Wang
Rookie
Posts: 1,155
And1: 620
Joined: Jan 07, 2024

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#8 » by Lo Wang » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:51 pm

bluejerseyjinx wrote:Hell no. Please. I'm on the floor rolling in so much laughter I can't gather a thought at the moment.


Why hell no?

This team is the youngest first seed in history. Chet is going to be a superstar, and who would have thought he would dominate Wembanyama in their first matchup? These young players have significantly improved: JDub is playing like a young DWade; Caruso is worth every penny; and Cason Wallace is a strong contender for 6th of the Year.

The Celtics have aged and Porzingis is injury prone.
Lo Wang
Rookie
Posts: 1,155
And1: 620
Joined: Jan 07, 2024

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#9 » by Lo Wang » Fri Nov 1, 2024 3:59 pm

Oh yea, Chet also outplayed Jokic. That's two of the best centers in the league.

So basically the Thunder not only have the best guard in the NBA (Shai), but possibly, the best center as well.

So far ....

I know it's a small sample, but Chet is different this year. He could very well be the best center in the NBA. He's the 2nd biggest reason why the Thunder are as good as they are.
Infinite Llamas
RealGM
Posts: 10,535
And1: 24,057
Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Location: Land of Llamas
   

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#10 » by Infinite Llamas » Fri Nov 1, 2024 4:12 pm

Lo Wang wrote:Oh yea, Chet also outplayed Jokic. That's two of the best centers in the league.

So basically the Thunder not only have the best guard in the NBA (Shai), but possibly, the best center as well.

So far ....

I know it's a small sample, but Chet is different this year. He could very well be the best center in the NBA. He's the 2nd biggest reason why the Thunder are as good as they are.


Best center in the NBA is textbook hyperbole.
Gerald Green Loves LLamas!
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,527
And1: 17,294
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#11 » by Mavrelous » Fri Nov 1, 2024 4:33 pm

I've watched both teams very closely in the PO, Thunder defense is underrated still, Chet was a monster defensively, at the level of prime DPOYs, better than anything Celtics has to offer at C, which closes the gap a bit 1-4 where the Celtics are elite at every position, still, Celtics are better defensively IMO, but offensively it wasn't close, at all, Celtics are just much better, JDub and Chet would need to prove they are legit #2 options offensively, they simply weren't against the Mavs, while all 5 on the Celtics are legit #2 offensive player, except maybe White.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Lo Wang
Rookie
Posts: 1,155
And1: 620
Joined: Jan 07, 2024

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#12 » by Lo Wang » Fri Nov 1, 2024 4:51 pm

Mavrelous wrote:I've watched both teams very closely in the PO, Thunder defense is underrated still, Chet was a monster defensively, at the level of prime DPOYs, better than anything Celtics has to offer at C, which closes the gap a bit 1-4 where the Celtics are elite at every position, still, Celtics are better defensively IMO, but offensively it wasn't close, at all, Celtics are just much better, JDub and Chet would need to prove they are legit #2 options offensively, they simply weren't against the Mavs, while all 5 on the Celtics are legit #2 offensive player, except maybe White.


That is not a fair assessment because you are basing it on last year.

This year, with the improvements and addition of Caruso, they are literally destroying the league.

20+ pts wins. That's not a win; that's an annihilation. And they are doing this to EVERY team so far.

This team is 2x better than last year. To use the metrics of last year is being disingenuous. No offense.

Please evaluate accordingly.
Lo Wang
Rookie
Posts: 1,155
And1: 620
Joined: Jan 07, 2024

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#13 » by Lo Wang » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:03 pm

Infinite Llamas wrote:
Lo Wang wrote:Oh yea, Chet also outplayed Jokic. That's two of the best centers in the league.

So basically the Thunder not only have the best guard in the NBA (Shai), but possibly, the best center as well.

So far ....

I know it's a small sample, but Chet is different this year. He could very well be the best center in the NBA. He's the 2nd biggest reason why the Thunder are as good as they are.


Best center in the NBA is textbook hyperbole.


How is this hyperbole?

You can't base his metrics on his rookie year because it does not take into consideration how hard he worked over the summer and how much he bulked up.

Those are factors that should be a metric.

It should also be a metric he outplayed Jokic and destroyed Wembanyama.

This is not the same weak Chet from last year. We are dealing with a different monster.
User avatar
Yinwest
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,273
And1: 1,767
Joined: Nov 04, 2009
 

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#14 » by Yinwest » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:05 pm

Experience wise, the Thunder are babies compared to the Celtics, can’t ignore that.
The Jays, White, KP are in their prime, Jrue is still effective, basically the entire starting five are elite 3/d players, and can be second option any given nights.
DrModesty
Rookie
Posts: 1,035
And1: 1,036
Joined: Jan 09, 2020

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#15 » by DrModesty » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:07 pm

Lo Wang wrote:
Infinite Llamas wrote:
Lo Wang wrote:Oh yea, Chet also outplayed Jokic. That's two of the best centers in the league.

So basically the Thunder not only have the best guard in the NBA (Shai), but possibly, the best center as well.

So far ....

I know it's a small sample, but Chet is different this year. He could very well be the best center in the NBA. He's the 2nd biggest reason why the Thunder are as good as they are.


Best center in the NBA is textbook hyperbole.


How is this hyperbole?

You can't base his metrics on his rookie year because it does not take into consideration how hard he worked over the summer and how much he bulked up.

Those are factors that should be a metric.

It should also be a metric he outplayed Jokic and destroyed Wembanyama.

This is not the same weak Chet from last year. We are dealing with a different monster.


It is too small a sample size to make sweeping conclusions from. If he spends all year looking like the DPOY, with double digit rebounding, near 25 ppg and mid 40% 3 point shooting then we can throw him in that conversation. Jokic has been incredible this year, and being slightly outplayed by Chet in one game doesn't swing the scales that far. Let alone healthy versions of Embiid and also Anthony Davis' amazing start.

Love the enthusiasm, but have a little patience Lo Wang.
LeBronSpaghetti
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,398
And1: 2,251
Joined: Mar 08, 2018

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#16 » by LeBronSpaghetti » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:08 pm

Thunder haven’t proven anything in the playoffs but they look great as a regular season team and are obviously very talented. If this is the finals it might just come down to who’s healthier.
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,858
And1: 9,305
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#17 » by hugepatsfan » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:13 pm

So obviously I'm biased. I just think with the Celtics you can't understate how schematically PERFECT that starting 5 is, even if it's Horford in there for Porzingis. They don't lack size anywhere. They can all shoot. They can all rebound. When Porzingis is in there they can all create for themselves one on one (w/ Horford "only" 4 out of 5 can). All good defensive ability and all good size for their positions. There's just no schematic weakness or advantage you can pull over them with those starters and in the playoffs those guys get their minutes extended (and it's not even like the bench is that weak either for those limited minutes).

Obviously the Thunder are awesome but until BOS gets knocked off I'm going to trust their group to get it done just because I think they're still the only team that in a playoff game can go most of the game without really any skill set trade off anywhere. I don't think there's a team that can put 5 guys out there with no schematic flaw like BOS can.
Lo Wang
Rookie
Posts: 1,155
And1: 620
Joined: Jan 07, 2024

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#18 » by Lo Wang » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:15 pm

Yinwest wrote:Experience wise, the Thunder are babies compared to the Celtics, can’t ignore that.
The Jays, White, KP are in their prime, Jrue is still effective, basically the entire starting five are elite 3/d players, and can be second option any given nights.


You can say the same thing as the Thunder but they don't stop with their starting 5. You still have Wallace, Wiggins, and Joe on the bench.

Thunder 5 > Celtics

Thunder bench > Celtics

Hell the coach is even better. Pozingis is probably going to be injured 50% of the games.

I'm not even taking Hartenstein into the equation.
LeBronSpaghetti
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,398
And1: 2,251
Joined: Mar 08, 2018

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#19 » by LeBronSpaghetti » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:38 pm

Lo Wang wrote:
Yinwest wrote:Experience wise, the Thunder are babies compared to the Celtics, can’t ignore that.
The Jays, White, KP are in their prime, Jrue is still effective, basically the entire starting five are elite 3/d players, and can be second option any given nights.


You can say the same thing as the Thunder but they don't stop with their starting 5. You still have Wallace, Wiggins, and Joe on the bench.

Thunder 5 > Celtics

Thunder bench > Celtics

Hell the coach is even better. Pozingis is probably going to be injured 50% of the games.

I'm not even taking Hartenstein into the equation.

Lol cmon. Nobody can match the Celtics two way perimeter players, not even the Thunder. The hope for the Thunder is that they have the best player and the best big. But as a unit the Celtics have ridiculous perimeter D and shooting.
GiannisAnte34
Analyst
Posts: 3,325
And1: 2,682
Joined: Jun 19, 2019
 

Re: Celtics vs Thunder 

Post#20 » by GiannisAnte34 » Fri Nov 1, 2024 5:53 pm

if Tatum flakes like he is known to do on the big stage, the Thunder have a chance

Return to The General Board