Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy

Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav

Drygon
Veteran
Posts: 2,968
And1: 5,216
Joined: Dec 18, 2018

Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#1 » by Drygon » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:06 am

Are Championships important? Yes.

But, there are 30 teams and one trophy. Not every player is going to have the stars align to win a title. Some are doomed by being drafted or traded to teams out of title contention. And some players are fortunate to be drafted into incredible situations or even goes to an all-time great team as a free agent.

Winning is one of the greatest indicators of success. But I have an issue with using the success of a team as the sole gauge of the success of an individual. We often over emphasize individuals on a successful team, while discrediting individuals on a less successful team.

Do you agree that rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy?
The Master
Veteran
Posts: 2,711
And1: 4,563
Joined: Dec 30, 2016

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#2 » by The Master » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:07 am

Rings shouldn't be meaningless in evaluation of the NBA legacy.

Rings should be less discussed in evaluation of the NBA legacy for aforementioned reasons.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 95,090
And1: 118,967
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Let's stop and get a hot dog
 

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#3 » by Capn'O » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:11 am

This message is brought to you by the Alex English Remembrance Society
BAF Clippers

PG: Brunson/Philon
SG: Black/Klay
SF: Jaquez/Riley
PF: Kuminga/
C: Kornet/Yanic

Craig Porter | Hugo


:beer:
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,761
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#4 » by Big J » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:20 am

This is loser talk.
Luke
Senior
Posts: 608
And1: 700
Joined: Sep 20, 2003
 

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#5 » by Luke » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:33 am

Lebron, is that you ? ;-)
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 29,271
And1: 61,742
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#6 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:39 am

Luke wrote:Lebron, is that you ? ;-)



It's really a Jokic thread.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 47,320
And1: 45,772
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#7 » by zimpy27 » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:42 am

Luke wrote:Lebron, is that you ? ;-)


LeBron's 3 championships with 3 separate teams does a lot of heavy lifting. I doubt he wants people not to care about rings.

Obviously rings aren't everything otherwise Big Shot Bob would be a top 20 player
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Slade3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,722
And1: 904
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#8 » by Slade3 » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:55 am

Yeah this seems like a Jokic thread.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 34,476
And1: 11,004
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#9 » by bstein14 » Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:59 am

Wilt's the only top 10 player of all-time without at least 3 and I'm not sure anyone else breaks into the top 10 without at least two. You can't win zero championships and be a top 10 player of all-time... probably not even just one championship.
Luke
Senior
Posts: 608
And1: 700
Joined: Sep 20, 2003
 

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#10 » by Luke » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:00 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Luke wrote:Lebron, is that you ? ;-)



It's really a Jokic thread.


Nah, Jokic' legacy is great anyway, he doesn't have the right teammates to win more, so far...
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 30,268
And1: 18,050
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#11 » by JayMKE » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:08 am

No, stepping up & winning when it matters is literally the most important thing to a legacy
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
Baz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,936
And1: 2,784
Joined: Mar 18, 2015

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#12 » by Baz » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:10 am

Not all rings hold the same weight. There's Kevin Durant's multiple rings. There's Dirk Nowitzki's ring. Which is the bigger number. 1 or 2?
MavsDirk41
Head Coach
Posts: 6,641
And1: 5,116
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#13 » by MavsDirk41 » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:12 am

Sounds like something Nick Wright or Rich Paul would say
doogie_hauser
RealGM
Posts: 11,355
And1: 13,293
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#14 » by doogie_hauser » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:30 am

Tell you what, would much rather my star players win rings than MVPs.

I think Joker is a wonderful player who is a top 15 player easily, however he cannot possibly be considered ahead of Duncan who won 5 rings with not star studded Spurs teams either.

Granted I think the quality and standard of players and teams is considerably stronger now than what it was in Duncan's era

If anything, rings these days should be more celebrated and revered cause they are so damn difficult to win.

Only enjoyed 2 in my 32 years of being a Celtics fan.
ScrantonBulls
Veteran
Posts: 2,966
And1: 3,872
Joined: Nov 18, 2023
     

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#15 » by ScrantonBulls » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:33 am

MavsDirk41 wrote:Sounds like something Nick Wright or Rich Paul would say

Your obsession with Rich Paul and Nick Wright is concerning. Those dudes might want to get a restraining order at this point.
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog

1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
MavsDirk41
Head Coach
Posts: 6,641
And1: 5,116
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#16 » by MavsDirk41 » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:34 am

ScrantonBulls wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:Sounds like something Nick Wright or Rich Paul would say

Your obsession with Rich Paul and Nick Wright is concerning. Those dudes might want to get a restraining order at this point.



Think i need one for you Taj
Luke
Senior
Posts: 608
And1: 700
Joined: Sep 20, 2003
 

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#17 » by Luke » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:37 am

zimpy27 wrote:
Luke wrote:Lebron, is that you ? ;-)


LeBron's 3 championships with 3 separate teams does a lot of heavy lifting. I doubt he wants people not to care about rings.

Obviously rings aren't everything otherwise Big Shot Bob would be a top 20 player


Big shot Rob is meaningless, because he is a role player. Nobody would put him above any ATG because he was a great role player in many championship teams.

Lebron is the player who has more to gain not counting rings, because people would count his cumulative stats, which are very good.

If the king was interested only in top 10 , he would want to count rings, but to be better he has not enough of them
ScrantonBulls
Veteran
Posts: 2,966
And1: 3,872
Joined: Nov 18, 2023
     

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#18 » by ScrantonBulls » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:46 am

Luke wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Luke wrote:Lebron, is that you ? ;-)


LeBron's 3 championships with 3 separate teams does a lot of heavy lifting. I doubt he wants people not to care about rings.

Obviously rings aren't everything otherwise Big Shot Bob would be a top 20 player


Big shot Rob is meaningless, because he is a role player. Nobody would put him above any ATG because he was a great role player in many championship teams.

Lebron is the player who has more to gain not counting rings, because people would count his cumulative stats, which are very good.

If the king was interested only in top 10 , he would want to count rings, but to be better he has not enough of them

Hence why nobody comes close to Bill Russell in the GOAT discussion.
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog

1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
ScrantonBulls
Veteran
Posts: 2,966
And1: 3,872
Joined: Nov 18, 2023
     

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#19 » by ScrantonBulls » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:48 am

MavsDirk41 wrote:
ScrantonBulls wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:Sounds like something Nick Wright or Rich Paul would say

Your obsession with Rich Paul and Nick Wright is concerning. Those dudes might want to get a restraining order at this point.



Think i need one for you Taj

With how often you call me that, I should probably have the mods change my name to it.

Without me, who is going to teach you about basketball and the NBA, son? You've come a long way so far.
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog

1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
User avatar
The KnicksFix
Head Coach
Posts: 6,370
And1: 6,436
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Rings are completely meaningsless to evaluate an NBA Legend's legacy 

Post#20 » by The KnicksFix » Thu Jan 30, 2025 5:54 am

Tf??? Giannis, dirk and jokic rings def weigh more than any of the heat’s rings with LeBron, wade, bosh, and any of the warrior rings with KD, klay, Steph, draymond

Stop it

Return to The General Board