Right out of the other
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2435248 thread here is a question that has been discussed here dozens, if not houndreds of times, but i dont recall a poll that was as simple as this one. The question is - do all rings count the same for you, or do you take into account what the winner had to overcome, how much an underdog they were, how many obstacles they had to overcome, how heroic the individual performance was? The question arose specifically in the context of assessing a players legacy, so lets view it for the individual. Curious to see what the majority thinks here. Just as some examples, some rings that might have been earned easily - or harder:
Dirk / Mavs beating a very strong Portland team, the defending champion Lakers and then the OKC superteam, to face the Miami superfriends (who mocked Dirk for his illness, "coughgate").
Kawhi in his one year stint with the Raptors
Giannis' legendary title run
Jokic carrying the Nuggets to a title, making scrubs look like all stars
Steph winning without most of his all star help (and without KD)
compared to
2017, 2018 Golden State Superteam
The Miami Superteam with three top 10 players and elite roleplayers
The Cleveland superteam with Kyrie, Love and great roleplayers
The Lakers superteam with two top 5 players on the same team
I'm sure i will get plenty animated responses

but mostly watching out for the poll results for later reference here.