
Continued from here: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2461536
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199
This was Tyrese Haliburton’s 4th game-tying or game-winning shot in final 1.3 seconds of 4th quarter or OT in these playoffs. All with Indy down.
One in each series: Game 5 vs. Bucks (1.3 seconds left) Game 2 vs. Cavaliers (1.1 seconds) Game 1 vs. Knicks (4th Q buzzer) Game 1 vs. Thunder (0.3 sec)
No player has made more than 2 of these shots in one postseason going back to the 1997 playoffs, according to @basketball-reference.com (that’s as far back as they go). Haliburton doubled that already.
Source: Mike Vorkunov Bluesky
Since the NBA began tracking such data in 1971, teams were 0-182 in the Finals when trailing by 9+ points in the final three minutes.
The Pacers made that record 1-182
Per NBA.com
UcanUwill wrote:I believe next game, Pacers will still be wearing these yellow jerseys, while OKC will be wearing blue jerseys of theirs, which should be more pleasing to the eye IMO, watching yellow vs white was kinda weird, you want one jersey to be dark and one to be bright, or am I alone here?
flow wrote:UcanUwill wrote:I believe next game, Pacers will still be wearing these yellow jerseys, while OKC will be wearing blue jerseys of theirs, which should be more pleasing to the eye IMO, watching yellow vs white was kinda weird, you want one jersey to be dark and one to be bright, or am I alone here?
I think there was enough contrast. I had no trouble with it and I'm color blind. Those who have been following the Pacers are used to it. They're wearing the same yellow jersey every game, home and away.
sp6r=underrated wrote:I'm torn. I don't believe teams can throw away playoff games but also believe Oklahoma City is markedly better than Indiana. The talent gap is still big enough that the Thunder will win it but they can't toss away another game.
bisme37 wrote:I saw a comment on another site that said, "The other team is scared to lose, but the Pacers are not scared to win."
Seems like Pacers opponents keep looking at the matchup and thinking they are better than Indy and going to win. Then they have a lead in the 4th and it confirms their belief that they are better and going to win.
Then Indy starts their comeback and game pressure mounts, and the other team starts playing not to lose instead of playing to win. And the Pacers feel super comfortable in those spots and play their best ball down the stretch. It's probably not very shocking anymore haha.
KazuoOda wrote:Not sure how people are still counting out the Pacers.
We've seen this song and dance the last couple of rounds.
Maybe it's just their year.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Chuck Everett wrote:sp6r=underrated wrote:I'm torn. I don't believe teams can throw away playoff games but also believe Oklahoma City is markedly better than Indiana. The talent gap is still big enough that the Thunder will win it but they can't toss away another game.
In every game that Jalen and Holmgren are anything less than all-star caliber, the Thunder are susceptible to losing. I hate to make it that simple, but Shai is going to score, flop and get fouled. He's not a variable.
In every loss this playoffs, it has happened this way. My concern with them is I just don't feel as comfortable in a crunch time game that their team offense will be better than the Pacers. Daigs has his work cut out for him. Thunder lost that game on offense, not defense.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.