Richard Jefferson: Best Analyst in the Business

durden_tyler · Post #1 » by **durden_tyler** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:35 am

A few things going for him, and a bunch of key factors that i think makes him a great analyst, arguably the best in the business currently, and perhaps an all-timer when all is said and done.

Depth in his takes - Being a former player and specifically being a role player but also a key starter in some of his stints when he played, he understands the nuances of being both.

In-game analysis on point, relevant - He can identify plays immediately, in-game and live game adjustments; recognizes those changes and explains the implications

Broad audience appeal - He can talk to both the casuals and fans with deeper understanding of the game

Humor - this one is obvious.

Chemistry with fellow commentators - He can be paired with anyone and consistently shows respect to his peers but not afraid to sarcastically call them out/be a contrarian.

Good relationship with players - this one is great for preparation; he can pick the brains of players before the games and mention these little details throughout the game

Tim_Hardawayy · Post #2 » by **Tim_Hardawayy** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:36 am

I think he's pretty good. Definitely better than Reggie, I still don't understand how Reggie is so popular with some.

fanofthegreats · Post #3 » by **fanofthegreats** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:39 am

Tim_Hardawayy wrote:I think he's pretty good. Definitely better than Reggie, I still don't understand how Reggie is so popular with some.

Can’t even listen to that guy

picc · Post #4 » by **picc** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:40 am

Did you know he went to Arizona?

Chuck Everett · Post #5 » by **Chuck Everett** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:47 am

He just has no chemistry with Mike Breen nor Doris. I liked him better with Ruoco or Dave Pasch. Maybe Breen is a part of the problem, alongside the three man booth? Breen seems to be fine with Clyde Frazier when I watch Knicks games on MSG.

bluemj32 · Post #6 » by **bluemj32** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:49 am

I've always enjoyed RJ. He's made for TV and gives great analysis breakdowns

Sent from my Pixel 6 using RealGM mobile app

Post #7 » by **Capn'O** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:50 am

Chuck Everett wrote:He just has no chemistry with Mike Breen nor Doris. I liked him better with Ruoco or Dave Pasch. Maybe Breen is a part of the problem, alongside the three man booth? Breen seems to be fine with Clyde Frazier when I watch Knicks games on MSG.

Breen and Clyde are amazing together. Theirs is a labor of love.

RJ is probably too snarky to mix well with Breen, who's an exceptionally earnest guy. I like RJ as a commentator though.

sp6r=underrated · Post #8 » by **sp6r=underrated** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:53 am

Capn'O wrote:
Chuck Everett wrote:He just has no chemistry with Mike Breen nor Doris. I liked him better with Ruoco or Dave Pasch. Maybe Breen is a part of the problem, alongside the three man booth? Breen seems to be fine with Clyde Frazier when I watch Knicks games on MSG.

Breen and Clyde are amazing together. Theirs is a labor of love.

RJ is probably too snarky to mix well with Breen, who's an exceptionally earnest guy. I like RJ as a commentator though.

I'm not a huge RJ fan but he would have worked much better with Marv due to Marv's lack of earnestness.

azcatz11 · Post #9 » by **azcatz11** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:59 am

durden_tyler wrote:A few things going for him, and a bunch of key factors that i think makes him a great analyst, arguably the best in the business currently, and perhaps an all-timer when all is said and done.

Depth in his takes - Being a former player and specifically being a role player but also a key starter in some of his stints when he played, he understands the nuances of being both.

In-game analysis on point, relevant - He can identify plays immediately, in-game and live game adjustments; recognizes those changes and explains the implications

Broad audience appeal - He can talk to both the casuals and fans with deeper understanding of the game

Humor - this one is obvious.

Chemistry with fellow commentators - He can be paired with anyone and consistently shows respect to his peers but not afraid to sarcastically call them out/be a contrarian.

Good relationship with players - this one is great for preparation; he can pick the brains of players before the games and mention these little details throughout the game

Impressive use of the green checkmarks. Never seen anything like that done before on here

durden_tyler · Post #10 » by **durden_tyler** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:08 am

azcatz11 wrote:
durden_tyler wrote:A few things going for him, and a bunch of key factors that i think makes him a great analyst, arguably the best in the business currently, and perhaps an all-timer when all is said and done.

Depth in his takes - Being a former player and specifically being a role player but also a key starter in some of his stints when he played, he understands the nuances of being both.

In-game analysis on point, relevant - He can identify plays immediately, in-game and live game adjustments; recognizes those changes and explains the implications

Broad audience appeal - He can talk to both the casuals and fans with deeper understanding of the game

Humor - this one is obvious.

Chemistry with fellow commentators - He can be paired with anyone and consistently shows respect to his peers but not afraid to sarcastically call them out/be a contrarian.

Good relationship with players - this one is great for preparation; he can pick the brains of players before the games and mention these little details throughout the game

Impressive use of the green checkmarks. Never seen anything like that done before on here

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lalouie · Post #11 » by **Lalouie** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:10 am

he's funny, quick, and listenable

azcatz11 · Post #12 » by **azcatz11** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 3:17 am

Lalouie wrote:he's funny, quick, and listenable

Surprised you like him

Lalouie · Post #13 » by **Lalouie** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:07 am

azcatz11 wrote:
Lalouie wrote:he's funny, quick, and listenable

Surprised you like him

and i don't even care for him cuz he's a cat - go figure

the only cat i like is jennie finch

Post #14 » by **floppymoose** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 6:24 am

Reggie Miller has never bothered me. He isnt great or anything, but i appear to be immune to whatever it us people cant stand. Mark Jackson, though…. Arghh.

Ridicululz · Post #15 » by **Ridicululz** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 8:31 am

Yeah he's funny and interesting to listen to.

doogie_hauser · Post #16 » by **doogie_hauser** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 8:32 am

Sorry I don't like him (and not because of his feud with Paul Pierce a few years ago either)

His voice really grates and he seems to enjoy talking over his co-callers..

robbie84 · Post #17 » by **robbie84** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 8:45 am

The best analyst in the business is Brian Scalabrine. In all seriousness, the guy's understanding of the modern game is absolutely incredible.
Next time your team plays the Celtics, tune in and listen to him.

durden_tyler · Post #18 » by **durden_tyler** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 9:05 am

robbie84 wrote:The best analyst in the business is Brian Scalabrine. In all seriousness, the guy's understanding of the modern game is absolutely incredible.
Next time your team plays the Celtics, tune in and listen to him.

i do like him, he's not as biased as your previous one so big change to that. (i forgot the old guy's name)

Tnasty4l · Post #19 » by **Tnasty4l** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 10:48 am

RJ sucks! too much bias towards the popular teams. Not just this series but every series he calls.

Post #20 » by **165bows** » Mon Jun 9, 2025 10:50 am

fanofthegreats wrote:
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:I think he's pretty good. Definitely better than Reggie, I still don't understand how Reggie is so popular with some.

Can’t even listen to that guy

That’s the key compared to the rest of the national broadcasts it’s not hard to stand apart