Karate Diop wrote:It's made brand recognition harder for sure... Short term profits is the name of the game though.
Nike and the NBA decided teams should change teams colors regularly for the reason you identified, short-term profits, rather than maintain the same basic color scheme for teams' jerseys with minor year-to-year alterations.
Jersey collectors are compulsive and feel the need to purchase any jersey their favorite player wears. By radically changing color schemes and branding they can induce these folks to buy new jerseys.
Most companies do not radically change their logos year-to-year. The norm for companies is something like MGM's Lion or the Chevy bowtie which changes rarely and slowly. Indeed the radical changing of color schemes in the NBA isn't that common in other sports leagues. Minor alterations to jerseys are common but the basic color scheme is fairly common.
The cost is that teams' brands are eroded which I suspect on the margins reduce long-term team identification. Team fans make up a relatively small percentage of the NBA fanbase in comparison to players fans. And on the margins changing team colors probably contributes.
But it does work to juice short-term profits. Look how excited some get here about the latest jerseys versions. I don't understand why anyone would care about a new jersey that will ditched shortly but a lot of people here really care probably because they buy them.