Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame?

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Should the NBA have it's own hall of fame?

Yes
16
48%
No
17
52%
 
Total votes: 33

User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,527
And1: 13,784
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#1 » by Effigy » Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:50 pm

I think we all agree that the Hall of Fame is simply too lax in it's criteria as to who it lets in. Would you be in favor of just an NBA-specific hall of fame? If they did something like that, they could impose specific criteria, hard qualifications to get in. For instance, one qualification could be 'made at least one All-NBA FIRST team' According to https://www.landofbasketball.com/awards/all_nba_teams_player_1st.htm 117 players have made at least 1 first team, so these 117 players would be the pool from which you could select. Probably many of them would get in, but there are a few guys who obviously would not. So an all nba first team award doesn't automatically get you in but it does keep you from automatically being left out. I think a lot of guys who only have one should be very heavily scrutinized. How does this list look? Anyone who wouldn't quailfy who you think should?

This is the list off 117 players with the number of first team selections, FYI.

LeBron James 13
Kobe Bryant 11
Karl Malone 11
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 10
Tim Duncan 10
Bob Cousy 10
Jerry West 10
Michael Jordan 10
Bob Pettit 10
Elgin Baylor 10
Oscar Robertson 9
Larry Bird 9
Magic Johnson 9
Shaquille O'Neal 8
Wilt Chamberlain 7
Giannis Antetokounmpo 7
Dolph Schayes 6
Kevin Durant 6
Hakeem Olajuwon 6
James Harden 6
George Mikan 6
Charles Barkley 5
Julius Erving 5
George Gervin 5
Nikola Jokic 5
Dwight Howard 5
Rick Barry 5
Jason Kidd 5
Luka Doncic 5
John Havlicek 4
Dirk Nowitzki 4
Stephen Curry 4
Chris Paul 4
Moses Malone 4
Kevin Garnett 4
Bill Sharman 4
David Robinson 4
Walt Frazier 4
Bob Davies 4
Anthony Davis 4
Neil Johnston 4
Jayson Tatum 4
Max Zaslofsky 4
Bill Russell 3
Allen Iverson 3
Elvin Hayes 3
Kawhi Leonard 3
Steve Nash 3
Scottie Pippen 3
Tiny Archibald 3
Jerry Lucas 3
Isiah Thomas 3
Paul Arizin 3
Billy Cunningham 3
Joe Fulks 3
Ed Macauley 3
Paul Westphal 3
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 3
John Stockton 2
Gary Payton 2
Russell Westbrook 2
Dwyane Wade 2
Tracy McGrady 2
Spencer Haywood 2
Pete Maravich 2
Jim Pollard 2
Bernard King 2
Dave Bing 2
Bob Feerick 2
Penny Hardaway 2
Alex Groza 2
David Thompson 2
Patrick Ewing 1
Damian Lillard 1
Dominique Wilkins 1
Joel Embiid 1
Grant Hill 1
Sidney Moncrief 1
Willis Reed 1
Amar'e Stoudemire 1
Tim Hardaway 1
Chris Webber 1
Clyde Drexler 1
Chris Mullin 1
Marques Johnson 1
Ralph Beard 1
Larry Foust 1
Harry Gallatin 1
Marc Gasol 1
Dennis Johnson 1
Bob McAdoo 1
George McGinnis 1
Bones McKinney 1
Stan Miasek 1
Donovan Mitchell 1
Alonzo Mourning 1
Gene Shue 1
Bill Walton 1
Gus Williams 1
George Yardley 1
Paul George 1
Mark Price 1
DeAndre Jordan 1
Devin Booker 1
Howie Dallmar 1
Gail Goodrich 1
Connie Hawkins 1
Kevin McHale 1
Earl Monroe 1
Joakim Noah 1
Truck Robinson 1
Derrick Rose 1
Ed Sadowski 1
Latrell Sprewell 1
Wes Unseld 1
Stan
Veteran
Posts: 2,605
And1: 3,991
Joined: Oct 11, 2019

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#2 » by Stan » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:14 pm

Yes, I also wish they had higher standards for who they voted in. Compared to the NFL & MLB the Basketball HOF lets in by far the least deserving players.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,061
And1: 9,741
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#3 » by Blame Rasho » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:17 pm

Oh the MJ retirement year when Latrell Sprewell had his 1st team selection and before he choked his coach and had his family to feed.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,399
And1: 26,658
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#4 » by dhsilv2 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:25 pm

So Tiny gets in because he played in the weak 70's but no Reggie Miller, Hal Greer, Melo (I'm good with that one), Butler, KJ, Blake, Ming, Deke, Gobert, Ben Wallace, Tony Parker, Paul Pierce, Billups, Cowens (who managed an MVP but not first team), Joe Dumars, Alex English, Sam Jones, Ray Allen, Vince Carter and many others.

Yeah I'm fine with an NBA hall but the first team all nba is massive bias to prior eras and leaves out top 10 type guys because of bs positional crap. So completely against that criteria.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,061
And1: 9,741
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#5 » by Blame Rasho » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:36 pm

I say we nominate Alex “the Beak” Groza to be in the nba hall of fame. Gambling is now endorsed by the NBA, so why not… lol.
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,190
And1: 31,340
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#6 » by cupcakesnake » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:38 pm

I don't particularly feel a need for an NBA-specific hall of fame.

The hall of fame is a career achievement award, and a chance for us as fans to remember (or learn about) special basketball careers. They let in around 8 new people every year, so it's not like it's some ridiculous long list where I don't care.

What do we actually accomplish by making the HoF more strict or NBA-ccentric. What do we as fans get out of this?
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,664
And1: 1,694
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#7 » by f4p » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:45 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:I don't particularly feel a need for an NBA-specific hall of fame.

The hall of fame is a career achievement award, and a chance for us as fans to remember (or learn about) special basketball careers. They let in around 8 new people every year, so it's not like it's some ridiculous long list where I don't care.

What do we actually accomplish by making the HoF more strict or NBA-ccentric. What do we as fans get out of this?


I mean assuming we're starting from the place that hall of fames matter (since they don't actually affect anything really), we would get a more deserving crop of guys where it feels like a big deal when someone makes it like the baseball hall of fame. It's always weird when someone has a fringe NBA case and people start saying things like "well he had a good college career". Like yeah, I would hope so if they are almost worthy of the hall of fame based on being a great NBA player. And if they didn't have a great college career then it's probably because they skipped college or went for 1 year, so we're just rewarding guys for not being good enough to go to the NBA so they stayed in college. And rewarding people for being less good kind of defeats the purpose of the HoF.

So that would be one thing it would help with.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,061
And1: 9,741
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#8 » by Blame Rasho » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:53 pm

I want to point out something that strikes me as odd,Christian Laettner is not in the HOF as an individual. He is one of the greatest college basketball players in my lifetime. Had a decent career in NBA and was a part of the dream team. I don’t get it.
User avatar
ImmortalD24
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,170
And1: 655
Joined: Apr 11, 2007

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#9 » by ImmortalD24 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:58 pm

Vince Carter not making a single All-NBA 1st reminds me just how stacked the early 00s was in wing play.
Iwasawitness wrote:Dude, swap prime LeBron with Mitchell and this would be the best team LeBron ever played on.
ChiTownHero1992
Analyst
Posts: 3,493
And1: 2,339
Joined: Apr 28, 2017
       

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#10 » by ChiTownHero1992 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:58 pm

Yes an NBA Hall of Fame , NCAA Hall of Fame, a FIBA Hall of Fame then a Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame, gives each league their own achievement but to be declared a "Basketball Hall of Famer" would be the real testament meaning they were a Career Great at multiple levels not just NBA, etc
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 19,114
And1: 21,886
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#11 » by Chuck Everett » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:00 pm

Have you actually been to the basketball HOF in Springfield, OP? I have and it's pretty boring. I am not sure what making an NBA HOF is really going to do for the most part.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,190
And1: 31,340
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#12 » by cupcakesnake » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:07 pm

f4p wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:I don't particularly feel a need for an NBA-specific hall of fame.

The hall of fame is a career achievement award, and a chance for us as fans to remember (or learn about) special basketball careers. They let in around 8 new people every year, so it's not like it's some ridiculous long list where I don't care.

What do we actually accomplish by making the HoF more strict or NBA-ccentric. What do we as fans get out of this?


I mean assuming we're starting from the place that hall of fames matter (since they don't actually affect anything really), we would get a more deserving crop of guys where it feels like a big deal when someone makes it like the baseball hall of fame. It's always weird when someone has a fringe NBA case and people start saying things like "well he had a good college career". Like yeah, I would hope so if they are almost worthy of the hall of fame based on being a great NBA player. And if they didn't have a great college career then it's probably because they skipped college or went for 1 year, so we're just rewarding guys for not being good enough to go to the NBA so they stayed in college. And rewarding people for being less good kind of defeats the purpose of the HoF.

So that would be one thing it would help with.


I'm always curious how many people fans want in a hall of fame, or where people personally draw the line.
Every now and then there's a player that gets in that makes me ponder their candidacy, but that's pretty rare for me in the modern era. I can't speak to a lot of the Celtics and Knicks that got in from the 50s lol.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
User avatar
MaxZaslofskyJr
Rookie
Posts: 1,088
And1: 709
Joined: Jan 06, 2013
Location: The Old MSG, Teaneck, Long Island, Piscataway, Meadowlands, Newark, Brooklyn

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#13 » by MaxZaslofskyJr » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:15 pm

Chuck Everett wrote:Have you actually been to the basketball HOF in Springfield, OP? I have and it's pretty boring. I am not sure what making an NBA HOF is really going to do for the most part.

Used to live in Hartford. Went there many times. Never thought it boring.
Les Selvage pioneered today's "modern basketball" in 1967.
(ABA 79 - NBA 76) ABA Forever
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#14 » by scrabbarista » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:36 pm

ImmortalD24 wrote:Vince Carter not making a single All-NBA 1st reminds me just how stacked the early 00s was in wing play.


Forwards more than wings, but yes.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#15 » by scrabbarista » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:44 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:
f4p wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:I don't particularly feel a need for an NBA-specific hall of fame.

The hall of fame is a career achievement award, and a chance for us as fans to remember (or learn about) special basketball careers. They let in around 8 new people every year, so it's not like it's some ridiculous long list where I don't care.

What do we actually accomplish by making the HoF more strict or NBA-ccentric. What do we as fans get out of this?


I mean assuming we're starting from the place that hall of fames matter (since they don't actually affect anything really), we would get a more deserving crop of guys where it feels like a big deal when someone makes it like the baseball hall of fame. It's always weird when someone has a fringe NBA case and people start saying things like "well he had a good college career". Like yeah, I would hope so if they are almost worthy of the hall of fame based on being a great NBA player. And if they didn't have a great college career then it's probably because they skipped college or went for 1 year, so we're just rewarding guys for not being good enough to go to the NBA so they stayed in college. And rewarding people for being less good kind of defeats the purpose of the HoF.

So that would be one thing it would help with.


I'm always curious how many people fans want in a hall of fame, or where people personally draw the line.
Every now and then there's a player that gets in that makes me ponder their candidacy, but that's pretty rare for me in the modern era. I can't speak to a lot of the Celtics and Knicks that got in from the 50s lol.


For players only (and NBA only), something like 1.49 players per NBA season would be appropriate in my opinion. Google says we're in the 78th NBA season, so that would put it at 116 players after this season.

There's never going to be a perfect solution, though. It will always be "too many" or "too few," or just "the wrong guys," no matter what the number is.

After a certain point on all-time lists, you can reasonably have huge divergences of opinion about rankings. (And, admittedly, that point occurs well before 116th!)

EDIT: I just noticed my 116 is so close to the OP's 117. Definitely not saying those should be the guys, though. Just an interesting coincidence.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,527
And1: 13,784
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#16 » by Effigy » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:55 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:So Tiny gets in because he played in the weak 70's but no Reggie Miller, Hal Greer, Melo (I'm good with that one), Butler, KJ, Blake, Ming, Deke, Gobert, Ben Wallace, Tony Parker, Paul Pierce, Billups, Cowens (who managed an MVP but not first team), Joe Dumars, Alex English, Sam Jones, Ray Allen, Vince Carter and many others.

Yeah I'm fine with an NBA hall but the first team all nba is massive bias to prior eras and leaves out top 10 type guys because of bs positional crap. So completely against that criteria.


That's good feedback. Though honestly, from your list, the only guys I look at and think they deserve to be in the Hall are Wallace, Butler and Cowens. That's crazy about Cowens winning an MVP and not getting first team though. I didn't know that. That one is easy enough to make a rule for, I almost did, but didn't think anyone would have won MVP and not a first team. I'd draw the line at Finals MVP though. That's not enough. Don't need to be putting in Chauncy and Andre Iguadalla and Jalen Brown, etc. (I mean, maybe Brown eventually, but not yet)
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,399
And1: 26,658
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#17 » by dhsilv2 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:57 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:I don't particularly feel a need for an NBA-specific hall of fame.

The hall of fame is a career achievement award, and a chance for us as fans to remember (or learn about) special basketball careers. They let in around 8 new people every year, so it's not like it's some ridiculous long list where I don't care.

What do we actually accomplish by making the HoF more strict or NBA-ccentric. What do we as fans get out of this?


We get to feel good about our bias!
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,527
And1: 13,784
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#18 » by Effigy » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:58 pm

scrabbarista wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:
f4p wrote:
I mean assuming we're starting from the place that hall of fames matter (since they don't actually affect anything really), we would get a more deserving crop of guys where it feels like a big deal when someone makes it like the baseball hall of fame. It's always weird when someone has a fringe NBA case and people start saying things like "well he had a good college career". Like yeah, I would hope so if they are almost worthy of the hall of fame based on being a great NBA player. And if they didn't have a great college career then it's probably because they skipped college or went for 1 year, so we're just rewarding guys for not being good enough to go to the NBA so they stayed in college. And rewarding people for being less good kind of defeats the purpose of the HoF.

So that would be one thing it would help with.


I'm always curious how many people fans want in a hall of fame, or where people personally draw the line.
Every now and then there's a player that gets in that makes me ponder their candidacy, but that's pretty rare for me in the modern era. I can't speak to a lot of the Celtics and Knicks that got in from the 50s lol.


For players only (and NBA only), something like 1.49 players per NBA season would be appropriate in my opinion. Google says we're in the 78th NBA season, so that would put it at 116 players after this season.

There's never going to be a perfect solution, though. It will always be "too many" or "too few," or just "the wrong guys," no matter what the number is.

After a certain point on all-time lists, you can reasonably have huge divergences of opinion about rankings. (And, admittedly, that point occurs well before 116th!)

EDIT: I just noticed my 116 is so close to the OP's 117. Definitely not saying those should be the guys, though. Just an interesting coincidence.


Right, also, keep in mind that of those 78 seasons, only like 58 seasons are currently eligible for the Hall of Fame (roughly) due to still being in the league or not having been retired long enough. My list includes I think 16 active players.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 49,399
And1: 26,658
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#19 » by dhsilv2 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:58 pm

f4p wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:I don't particularly feel a need for an NBA-specific hall of fame.

The hall of fame is a career achievement award, and a chance for us as fans to remember (or learn about) special basketball careers. They let in around 8 new people every year, so it's not like it's some ridiculous long list where I don't care.

What do we actually accomplish by making the HoF more strict or NBA-ccentric. What do we as fans get out of this?


I mean assuming we're starting from the place that hall of fames matter (since they don't actually affect anything really), we would get a more deserving crop of guys where it feels like a big deal when someone makes it like the baseball hall of fame. It's always weird when someone has a fringe NBA case and people start saying things like "well he had a good college career". Like yeah, I would hope so if they are almost worthy of the hall of fame based on being a great NBA player. And if they didn't have a great college career then it's probably because they skipped college or went for 1 year, so we're just rewarding guys for not being good enough to go to the NBA so they stayed in college. And rewarding people for being less good kind of defeats the purpose of the HoF.

So that would be one thing it would help with.


The thing is if we did this and then we doubled down. Most americans would consider the college basketball hall of fame as just as big if not bigger because at the end of the day...a lot more people seem to care about the NCAA. So I'm not sure you're really getting all that much here.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,257
And1: 17,961
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: Would you support an NBA-Specific Hall of Fame? 

Post#20 » by scrabbarista » Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:02 pm

Effigy wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:
I'm always curious how many people fans want in a hall of fame, or where people personally draw the line.
Every now and then there's a player that gets in that makes me ponder their candidacy, but that's pretty rare for me in the modern era. I can't speak to a lot of the Celtics and Knicks that got in from the 50s lol.


For players only (and NBA only), something like 1.49 players per NBA season would be appropriate in my opinion. Google says we're in the 78th NBA season, so that would put it at 116 players after this season.

There's never going to be a perfect solution, though. It will always be "too many" or "too few," or just "the wrong guys," no matter what the number is.

After a certain point on all-time lists, you can reasonably have huge divergences of opinion about rankings. (And, admittedly, that point occurs well before 116th!)

EDIT: I just noticed my 116 is so close to the OP's 117. Definitely not saying those should be the guys, though. Just an interesting coincidence.


Right, also, keep in mind that of those 78 seasons, only like 58 seasons are currently eligible for the Hall of Fame (roughly) due to still being in the league or not having been retired long enough. My list includes I think 16 active players.


Hey, if we're going to start a new HoF, just make active players eligible. 8-) Good point, though; if they weren't eligible, my current Hall would be well under 116 (under 100, I'm pretty certain). But my 1.49 number ultimately would still stand.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.

Return to The General Board