
Discuss. I have no idea what Pat is doing anymore. I get not wanting to bleed assets, but you gotta give a LITTLE, or you gotta choose a path (compete or rebuild).
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro
Dan Z wrote:Is there any truth to this? Seems like a random rumor.
It's possible that he didn't want to give up much for a 37 year old Durant who will be up for a contract extension, but i doubt Highsmith stopped them from making a deal.
bisme37 wrote:Dan Z wrote:Is there any truth to this? Seems like a random rumor.
It's possible that he didn't want to give up much for a 37 year old Durant who will be up for a contract extension, but i doubt Highsmith stopped them from making a deal.
This is all I've seen about it, but it says it's based on a report from Shams. He must have said something about it on ESPN today. There is more to the report than just Highsmith though.
shangrila wrote:bisme37 wrote:Dan Z wrote:Is there any truth to this? Seems like a random rumor.
It's possible that he didn't want to give up much for a 37 year old Durant who will be up for a contract extension, but i doubt Highsmith stopped them from making a deal.
This is all I've seen about it, but it says it's based on a report from Shams. He must have said something about it on ESPN today. There is more to the report than just Highsmith though.
Yeah, this seems like intentional wording to get clicks. Which if it wasn't obvious before, should have become obvious to everyone when the Bane trade was reported as 4 unprotected picks...with one of them being the 16th pick from the draft next week. Technically correct but intentionally clickbaiting.
I don't blame them for not wanting to empty the cupboard for Durant. If Highsmith specifically was the breaking point and they turned the deal down then that would be foolish, but if it was more along the lines of "here's what we're willing to offer and nothing more" then I don't see a problem with that.
Snakebites wrote:KD/Bam/Herro isn’t a title core.
I don’t actually blame him here. The deal makes a lot more sense for Houston- they are more asset wealthy and closer to contention, but I think MOST teams shouldn’t be giving up significant future assets to get KD at this stage.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.