RealGM

Between 1999 and 2014, the San Antonio Spurs captured five NBA championships—but not all title teams were created equal. When evaluated on a 1–100 scale using average player impact, regular season record, playoff dominance (including games lost, series length), and Finals margin of victory, clear gaps emerge in overall greatness.

1999 Spurs – 93/100
This was a lockdown defensive unit that tore through the playoffs with a 15–2 record. Despite the lockout-shortened 37–13 regular season, they swept both the Lakers and Blazers before dispatching the Knicks in five. Tim Duncan was unstoppable, and the Spurs held opponents to just 84 points per game in the postseason. Ruthlessly efficient and utterly dominant.

2003 Spurs – 82/100
A transitional team bridging eras. David Robinson was fading, while Parker and Ginóbili were still developing. Duncan was at his peak, but the 16–8 playoff run required heavy lifting. They needed six games to beat the Nets and barely scraped past Dallas in seven. A gritty grind to the title—respectable, but far from overpowering.

2005 Spurs – 86/100
Built on balance, experience, and elite defense. Duncan, Parker, and Manu were in sync, with Robert Horry adding clutch brilliance. The 16–7 playoff record was more polished than 2003, but they went the full seven against Detroit in a grueling Finals. While defensively suffocating, the offense sputtered at times in close games.

2007 Spurs – 90/100
This was a poised, veteran squad with chemistry and killer instinct. They cruised through the playoffs at 16–4 and swept LeBron’s young Cavs in the Finals. Critics point to Cleveland’s inexperience, but the Spurs’ execution and Parker’s Finals MVP run make this one of the most complete campaigns in franchise history.

2014 Spurs – 95/100
Their magnum opus. The 2014 team delivered the most aesthetically dominant Finals performance ever, dismantling the Heat with a record-setting +14.0 point differential. Their offense flowed like poetry—movement, timing, unselfishness—and Kawhi Leonard’s breakout sealed it. Though they went 16–7 overall, nearly all losses came early. Once locked in, they redefined team basketball.

Final Verdict:
The 2014 Spurs top the list with a 95, redefining beauty in basketball. The 1999 squad follows closely at 93 for their cold-blooded defensive demolition. The 2007 team earns a 90 for consistency and Finals dominance. The 2005 and 2003 champions, while formidable, rank slightly lower due to tighter margins and less control over their playoff paths.

99 was the first one.
14 was atonement for 2013's disappointment.
05 was expected, I never saw the Suns as a threat to the inevitable Spurs title
07 is just kind of there.

03 was most memorable for me.

The 01 WCF hurt really badly. The 02 semis made realize the Spurs weren't able to compete with LA at that point. The 03 semis made it all better. The three time champs were beaten, Kobe and Derek Fisher, two guys who absolutely killed it in the 01 WCF, were filmed on the bench crying, and Phil Jackson was free to take that 99 asterisk comment and shove it up his own ass.

This is cool!

Me personally. I'd say a tie between 1999 and 2014.
1999 was our very first title. Believe it or not, Coach Pop was a lil on the hot seat early that season (unfairly IMO, it was a lockout season and the team started off slow ... we were 6-8, we had just lost to Utah....again, who dominated the Spurs throughout the '90s, regular season and playoffs, Jazz beat the Spurs in the playoffs the prior season again). The Jazz and Pacers were some of the favorites to win it all that season (MJ Bulls had just retired, disbanded. Both teams gave the Bulls tuff competition during the era. NBA Finals and CEFs/playoffs.
The Spurs was a veteran team (David Robinson, Sean Elliott, Mario Ellie, Avery Johnson, Jerome Kersey, Jaren Jackson, Steve Kerr, Will Perdue (some who had championship experience from other teams (Rockets, Bulls, etc) surrounding young players like Duncan, Malik Rose, Antonio Daniels.
Then the Spurs caught fire after a lockerroom meeting. The Spurs came all the way back to take the #1 seed in the West away from Utah (last week of the season). Won the Midwest division. Spurs and Jazz were tied (37-13), but Spurs got the tie breaker , due to finally winning head to head series in the season (3-2).
Anyhow, the Comeback win in game 1 in the WCF over #2 seed Portland set the tone. Elliot off balance 3 from the corner tore Portland's heart after being up big the entire game. Also as of note, The TBlazers had beaten the Jazz in the 2nd round. Utah was in our heads during the '90s and early '00s. They had dominated SA for a long time. So, not facing Utah in the 1999 WCF was a big deal lol. Otherwise it would have been very possible Utah Jazz beating the Knicks in the NBA Finals, 3rd straight trip to the NBA Finals for Utah.
It was a special time for SA, as they have never gotten over the hump until 1999.
Swept the Lakers and TBlazers in the playoffs, nearly swept Minnesota and NY Knicks.

2014 was great! Vindication for the heartbreak in 2013. It was a very dark offseason for the city, fanbase, players, coach. 2013 was a choke job, Miami did well, very clutch. 2014 Spurs went full throttle and thrashed the Heat in a near sweep and blowout wins. It was a fun lil rivalry . SA's last title as of yet.

2005 was great too. Very nerve racking! Defending champs Pistons had us on the ropes. Nearly every game was close. Went the whole 7 games.

2003 (vs Nets, they hung in the lots of close games took us to 6 games) and 2007 (vs Cavs, close games too, but a sweep) were OK. lol

'99 was the best defensively.
'14 was the best offensively. Same for '13, but we lost in game 7 .

2005 and 2007 we had to get past the Suns , they were tuff.

To see Duncan's greatness in 2003 was special for me. Dude was truly the best basketball player in the world. The Duncan-led Spurs gave us so many classic playoff games/series, it's kind of hard for me to pick. 2014 was special because very rarely does the team that comes up short get back to the summit the next year (Virginia did it college basketball and so did the KC Royals).

This is actually a tough question to answer. My first thought is the 99 team because they dominated the postseason and had a young Duncan with a still all-star level Robinson and some great defensive pieces around them. 2014 obviously probably is the most memorable and the ensemble they had was incredible but the stars were either old (big three) or not in their prime yet (Kawhi). 2007 is the year that the big three was all closest to their primes at the same time. Hard to pick but I'd probably go with the 2014 Spurs

Personally I like 05, i think the suns and pistons that year showed great versatility and opponents were throwing cheap shots and crying to the media in desperation. If Duncan had been healthier they would have been more dominant but regardless I think that team had the best combination of offense and defense

Great question to ask on the Spurs board

Chuck Everett wrote:To see Duncan's greatness in 2003 was special for me. Dude was truly the best basketball player in the world. The Duncan-led Spurs gave us so many classic playoff games/series, it's kind of hard for me to pick. 2014 was special because very rarely does the team that comes up short get back to the summit the next year (Virginia did it college basketball and so did the KC Royals).

All of this. Also putting an end to the Lakers run was pretty special.

maradro wrote:Personally I like 05, i think the suns and pistons that year showed great versatility and opponents were throwing cheap shots and crying to the media in desperation. If Duncan had been healthier they would have been more dominant but regardless I think that team had the best combination of offense and defense

The Nuggets and Sonics series were brutal. Manu was getting smashed to the ground constantly but all it did was make him angry and more determined

For me it's 2014 easily. That team didn't have a superstar. Their leading scorer was Tony parker averaging 17.4 ppg in the playoffs, which is just unheard of today. They were perhaps the pinnacle of pure ball movement and teamwork.

MrBigShot wrote:For me it's 2014 easily. That team didn't have a superstar. Their leading scorer was Tony parker averaging 17.4 ppg in the playoffs, which is just unheard of today. They were perhaps the pinnacle of pure ball movement and teamwork.

Parker, Manu, Green, Kawhi, Duncan

Tony and Green were prime and Kawhi was DPOY. Duncan and Manu were ageing but Duncan was still all star and all NBA level, many was still the best 6th man in the league.

Equivalent today would be like FVV, Harden, Herb, LeBron, Wemby

03 was the most impressive to me because that team was terrible. Robinson was too old, Manu and Parker were too young. It was the closest I’ve ever seen to a player winning a title by himself. Duncan is truly one of the greats.

2014. Because it (mostly) healed lethal wound from the epic choke job of 2013.

Not only did they win, but they did it in THE MOST dominating fashion ever for the Finals. Then you throw in " The Beautiful Game" aspect on top of that. Yeah, 2014 holds a special place in my heart.

Lefty20 wrote:2014. Because it (mostly) healed lethal wound from the epic choke job of 2013.

Not only did they win, but they did it in THE MOST dominating fashion ever for the Finals. Then you throw in " The Beautiful Game" aspect on top of that. Yeah, 2014 holds a special place in my heart.

Good that You classify 2013 as choke job. Spurs should have never lost that series. They were the better team and the game 6 should have been done and dusted way before Allen three.

coming back from ray allen's dagger to win it all again gotta feel good.

The next one, with Wemby.

I still think 2013 was the best basketball they played and probably the most pure basketball I’ve ever seen.

zimpy27 wrote:

MrBigShot wrote:For me it's 2014 easily. That team didn't have a superstar. Their leading scorer was Tony parker averaging 17.4 ppg in the playoffs, which is just unheard of today. They were perhaps the pinnacle of pure ball movement and teamwork.

Parker, Manu, Green, Kawhi, Duncan

Tony and Green were prime and Kawhi was DPOY. Duncan and Manu were ageing but Duncan was still all star and all NBA level, many was still the best 6th man in the league.

Equivalent today would be like FVV, Harden, Herb, LeBron, Wemby

Don't forget Boris Diaw. That dude was super underrated and a huge part of the Spurs success

if we're being honest, they faced weak competition every year and none of their championships is very impressive. I think had they not choked in 2013 that would have been it.

FarBeyondDriven wrote:if we're being honest, they faced weak competition every year and none of their championships is very impressive. I think had they not choked in 2013 that would have been it.

2014 they beat the arguable GOAT during the peak of his prime. Wade was injured but Bosh was going.