Page 1 of 4

Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 11:03 am
by Deivork
It's been quite evident the last decade imo: giving your superstar power to influence management decisions has been proven fatal.

- Durant, Kyrie and Harden collapsing in Brooklyn and demanding Steve Nash. Probably the biggest failure in NBA history.
- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.
- Giannis was kinda vocal asking for changes, Dame Lillard in particular and generally putting pressure since their ring. It only got worse and worse.
- Kawhi's demand of Paul George submitted Clippers management into a heavily lopsided trade and they lost a future HoF in SGA.
- KD's got to be the worst at this: I believe he also pushed for the Suns to trade for Beal, which proved to be a terrible move.

I'm sure there are a few more examples.

On the contrary, while carrying influence, more patient stars such as Dirk, Duncan, Curry or Jokic let management do their work and benefitted by staying in one franchise and winning rings eventually.

The player empowerment era is also probably slowing down because of this.

What do you think?

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 11:06 am
by SlimShady83
Deivork wrote:- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.


oof lols, wonder what his going to be like as Legm and for real :lol:

Only time will tell :lol:

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 11:11 am
by Jon1798
For the Pelicans, at this point I would welcome it.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 11:33 am
by Lalouie
the player empowerment era started and ends with LeBron

no one would try to control nor have the power to control quite like LeBron

so don't worry.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 11:36 am
by Black Jack
SlimShady83 wrote:
Deivork wrote:- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.


oof lols, wonder what his going to be like as Legm and for real :lol:

Only time will tell :lol:


LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2025 11:39 am
by SlimShady83
Black Jack wrote:
SlimShady83 wrote:
Deivork wrote:- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.


oof lols, wonder what his going to be like as Legm and for real :lol:

Only time will tell :lol:


LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:

Haters gonna hate bruh.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 5:40 am
by Lalouie
Black Jack wrote:
SlimShady83 wrote:
Deivork wrote:- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.


oof lols, wonder what his going to be like as Legm and for real :lol:

Only time will tell :lol:


LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:


i dont recall lebron RECRUITING anyone. @miami all those guys jumped on the bandwagon. klove wanted to play with lebron. kyrie wanted to get away. ad is a klutch client. they all were ring chasers. what exactly did lebron do?

lebron wanted spoelstra removed. the organization @miami was of riley's construction not lebrons. miami was already a top5 defense

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 5:44 am
by ScrantonBulls
Deivork wrote:It's been quite evident the last decade imo: giving your superstar power to influence management decisions has been proven fatal.

- Durant, Kyrie and Harden collapsing in Brooklyn and demanding Steve Nash. Probably the biggest failure in NBA history.
- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.
- Giannis was kinda vocal asking for changes, Dame Lillard in particular and generally putting pressure since their ring. It only got worse and worse.
- Kawhi's demand of Paul George submitted Clippers management into a heavily lopsided trade and they lost a future HoF in SGA.
- KD's got to be the worst at this: I believe he also pushed for the Suns to trade for Beal, which proved to be a terrible move.

I'm sure there are a few more examples.

On the contrary, while carrying influence, more patient stars such as Dirk, Duncan, Curry or Jokic let management do their work and benefitted by staying in one franchise and winning rings eventually.

The player empowerment era is also probably slowing down because of this.

What do you think?

I thought LeBron orchestrated AD to the Lakers? You failed to give him credit for AD and the championship. AD was also flipped for Luka, so LeBron gets credit for that too.

LeGMs track record is impecible. His teams make the finals damn near 50% of the time.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 5:45 am
by ScrantonBulls
Black Jack wrote:
SlimShady83 wrote:
Deivork wrote:- LeBron wanting Westbrook and then getting rid of him. Lakers paid twice for that.


oof lols, wonder what his going to be like as Legm and for real :lol:

Only time will tell :lol:


LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:

You beat me to it. LeGM's teams make the finals nearly 50% of the time. That's absurd. Not only is he the GOAT on the court, but he's also an all time GM.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 5:49 am
by ScrantonBulls
Lalouie wrote:
Black Jack wrote:
SlimShady83 wrote:
oof lols, wonder what his going to be like as Legm and for real :lol:

Only time will tell :lol:


LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:


i dont recall lebron RECRUITING anyone. @miami all those guys jumped on the bandwagon. klove wanted to play with lebron. kyrie wanted to get away. ad is a klutch client. they all were ring chasers. what exactly did lebron do?

lebron wanted spoelstra removed. the organization @miami was of riley's construction not lebrons. miami was already a top5 defense

And which player has strong sway over Klutch?

Billionaires (LeBron) simply operate on a different level. He was playing chess while others were playing checkers. You were playing connect four.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 6:08 am
by Ruma85
ScrantonBulls wrote:
Lalouie wrote:
Black Jack wrote:
LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:


i dont recall lebron RECRUITING anyone. @miami all those guys jumped on the bandwagon. klove wanted to play with lebron. kyrie wanted to get away. ad is a klutch client. they all were ring chasers. what exactly did lebron do?

lebron wanted spoelstra removed. the organization @miami was of riley's construction not lebrons. miami was already a top5 defense

And which player has strong sway over Klutch?

Billionaires (LeBron) simply operate on a different level. He was playing chess while others were playing checkers. You were playing connect four.


Yet he wins 40% of the time. :lol:

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:13 am
by Dominator83
Yea I'm an MJ guy , but LeBron has been WAY better at being a GM. Not even close. Even when you ignore his awful runs with the wizards and hornets and for thread purposes and only go by as a player, his ideas were awful and he's lucky the Bulls didn't listen to him.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible proven move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:39 am
by Lalouie
ScrantonBulls wrote:
Lalouie wrote:
Black Jack wrote:
LeGM created not one, not two, but THREE DIFFERENT TITLE WINNING ROSTERS!!!!

It's stunning the "superstars suck as GMs" posters refuse to give LeBron his propers. :banghead:


i dont recall lebron RECRUITING anyone. @miami all those guys jumped on the bandwagon. klove wanted to play with lebron. kyrie wanted to get away. ad is a klutch client. they all were ring chasers. what exactly did lebron do?

lebron wanted spoelstra removed. the organization @miami was of riley's construction not lebrons. miami was already a top5 defense

And which player has strong sway over Klutch?

Billionaires (LeBron) simply operate on a different level. He was playing chess while others were playing checkers. You were playing connect four.


i dont hear any stories about lebron sitting at any table negotiating a player's contract with a team

it was the hope of a ring that motivated players to join lebron. to wit: beyond the covid fake ring the lakers have been shunned. its almost like players are avoiding lebrob

it pretty much all started with kawhi shunning lebron

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:59 am
by Richard4444
Players usually are not great roster managers.

But players will always have levarage when UFA or in the end of their contracts.

Front office must tone down interference from the stars when they are in the middle of their contracts and should not have such power. Because the NBA should not allow players to refuse to play after asking for a trade.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 10:02 am
by Slava
In all the glazing Lawrence Frank gets from the NBA media, I'm surprised by how rarely the SGA trade is even brought up for how awful it turned out to be. Windhorst and Simmons still bring up the AD trade as somehow it was a massive overpay, even if the best outgoing asset in that trade was probably Josh Hart and the Lakers managed to win a championship, make a conference final and then turn Davis into Luka, while the Clippers lost George to podcasting and free agency.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 10:52 am
by Optms
Lebron has won championships with 3 different franchises as the man. Something you will likely ever see in your life time in any major sport. Terrible example.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 10:54 am
by brutalitops
Optms wrote:Lebron has won championships with 3 different franchises. Terrible example.

He should of won 19 titles. If Jordan can win it with Pippen LeBron should be able to with Mo Williams.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 11:59 am
by Optms
brutalitops wrote:
Optms wrote:Lebron has won championships with 3 different franchises. Terrible example.

He should of won 19 titles. If Jordan can win it with Pippen LeBron should be able to with Mo Williams.


And Jordan should have won 10 while playing in an inferior watered down product.

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 12:45 pm
by MrPainfulTruth
I have to agree with the LeBron fans and influencers who claim he has been so successful at creating the superteams. Its probably the one skill he really was successful at - stacking the deck in his favor to the max, pick the right base (franchise and weak conference), recruit the right super talented beta mentality stars, convince the ownership and management to follow his advice and at the same time manipulating the media to create a narrative that he did everything on his own.

At the same time, ironically, those same posters denied that he had superteams for the past 15 years. Flip flopping at its finest. :lol:

Re: Allowing your star to GM: worst possible move?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 1:10 pm
by JujitsuFlip
I think LeBron has some highs and lows on his GM résumé.

But yes, no one can ever take away from him winning 3 titles with 3 different side kicks, 3 different head coaches, in 3 different cities.

This isn't MJ leaning on Phil and Pippen in Chicago over and over again.