GeorgeMarcus wrote:I've been in the minority for a while now on MPJ and believing he's wrongly maligned by the public. It's probably a bad time to post this as he's primed for a rough night against Ausar, but if I can't say it on down nights then I probably shouldn't say it at all
This isn't meant to be a dig on CJ who is fine but straight up, I consider MPJ to be the better/more impactful player. Obviously contracts played a part in DEN's decision to move on- which allowed them to add much needed depth- but the way I see it BKN made a great trade landing an undervalued building block + a FRP while extra $$ is a non issue.
As such, I'm curious where people stand: who won the trade and which player is better in a vacuum?
well, like u said no1 thought the gap between these two guys was huge in a vacuum but the salaries are a huge boon, as it let Denver add that depth
so when you compare it, you need to look at the trade as say: CJ + Jonas V + THJ vs. MPJ + a pick (a denver FRP is basically an SRP)
as for MPJ, there are a couple of things he does very well but other glaring holes in his game. Nuggets have a higher ceiling with CJ, on both ends of the floor but it's the defensive lapses that are the core issue. MPJ is a very low i.q player and he kept botching defensive reads,coverages and assignments
CJ is much better in those aspects and a much better fit
over the first 7-8 games, CJ has been very poor offensively. he's only playing about 27 mpg and taking just 7.8 FGA which is really low. he's also a career 40% from 3 on great volume, whose currently shooting 27% from 3, that will obviously regress to the mean later in the season
idk if it's getting accustmed to the Denver system, lifestyle or whatever the reasons may be but it's pretty likely he'll play much better as the season progresses and i don't read too much into his abysmal offensive start
as for MPJ, yeah he's chucking away to his heart's delight over in Brooklyn as everyone knew and expected and obviously their lineup is terrible with awful shooting and spacing, so it's hard to be too critical but currently he's shooting a shade under 34% from 3 on 9 3PA - that's pretty bad, or rather - very replaceable and thus, not that valuble
he also has 3 APG to 2,4 TO, which sums up pretty well his abilities as a playmaker and faciliator

in the context of this tanking Nets team, whose gonna put up shots? basically just him and Cam Thomas, now Cam is out for a while, look out as those volumes and efficiency from MPJ will drop ever further. it's better for MPJ to take 9 terriblle 3's at 34% (which would be by far the worst mark of his career), over non-shooting rookies but it doesn't actually have much value around the league
in a vacum both are useful role player and are about the same tier of players. I think most NBA teams, coaches and GM's would take Cam because of the I,Q difference and the intangibles but they're a similar caliber player
edit: i'd like to add that Cam wasn't likely to extend for the rebuilding Nets, so in a year or two he would have walked for free. getting something back for him makes sense, and MPJ and a pick is def "something" but honestly I think the Nets could have gotten more from a different team, over the summer or at the deadline
MPJ on his current contract isn't a positive asset, it's a neutral asset at best, I think the Nets could have done better because I don't really see how they turn MPJ into assets in the future, only when he'll be expiring but not a second before that
so all they got is a great tank commander because well, giving MPJ the green light to chuck and "create" is a surefire way to lose alot of games and a FRP that will be in the 25-30 range, think there was a better deal for them out there
as for the Nuggets, if the package is MPJ + that pick, I don't think they could have done better than CJ with that parituclar package, so I still see them as the clear cut winners in this trade and yeah, CJ has started poorly but he'll turn it around. no worries there.