Can this team win it all? Or how far can it go?

miula · Post #1 » by **miula** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:47 am

If we put together 90s all-stars who haven't won any ring into one team(in their current status), how far can it go? Can it win the champ?

PG - Jason Kidd
SG - Eddie Jones
SF - Grant Hill
PF - Chris Webber
C - Erick Dampier

Bench - Juwan Howard / Jim Jackson / Penny Hardaway / Theo Ratliff / Brevin Kinght

I will predict maybe its a 55~60 win team

farzi · Post #2 » by **farzi** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:48 am

6-8th seed in the east, not even playoffs in the west.

LiquidFire · Post #3 » by **LiquidFire** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:51 am

55-60 win team.

Haha, thats priceless.

bad team btw

raps4life~ · Post #4 » by **raps4life~** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:03 am

its not a bad team. kidd, webber and hill. it would be a pretty good team. dont know about championship tho.

El Turco · Post #5 » by **El Turco** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:04 am

wow that s a bad bench if i seen one. especially considering the injury prone line up.

35-40 wins.

Post #6 » by **penbeast0** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:05 am

Good team but gutless other than Kidd . . . Dampier was a 90s All-Star?

Cevap · Post #7 » by **Cevap** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:11 am

lotto

mattyj · Post #8 » by **mattyj** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:12 am

I dont remember Dampier, Jackson or Knight making the all-star team??

miula · Post #9 » by **miula** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:14 am

there aren't that many all stars who haven't won any rings that still play the game now...

kbitboc · Post #10 » by **kbitboc** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:25 am

What about Kevin Garnett? Didnt he make the all-star in 1997?

BobbySura · Post #11 » by **BobbySura** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:34 am

jones and webber are basically done.

kidd can't score worth a crap.

hill can't carry a team anymore.

dampier is too inconsistent

jackson has been done for years

penny too

ratliff as well

that team is so terrible defensively i think they'd make the miami heat right now look like the 1990s bulls.

everyone in their primes and that team is easily a dynasty, but too many done, injury prone terrible defenders to matter now.

Post #12 » by **TMACFORMVP** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:33 am

miula wrote:If we put together 90s all-stars who haven't won any ring into one team(in their current status), how far can it go? Can it win the champ?

PG - Jason Kidd
SG - Eddie Jones
SF - Grant Hill
PF - Chris Webber
C - Erick Dampier

Bench - Juwan Howard / Jim Jackson / Penny Hardaway / Theo Ratliff / Brevin Kinght

I will predict maybe its a 55~60 win team

Meaning how they are now? Frankly they'd be in the Derrick Rose sweepstakes if that was the case.

Prime? Hardaway would start, as would Ratliff and that team, THEN would likely be the favorite to win it all.

Duiz · Post #13 » by **Duiz** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:54 am

The problem is the chemistry, and it doesn't look like the would be one when there isn't more of a volume scorer in the lineup. If we could change Hill with Igoudala then I think it would be better.

Post #14 » by **UTMCretin** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:31 am

That is a horrible team. Lottery, at least.

Patterns · Post #15 » by **Patterns** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:58 am

I am not sure how well they can work together though. Hill, Kidd, Webber all need the ball to be effective.

Knicksfan20 · Post #16 » by **Knicksfan20** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:17 am

Was AI not a 90's allstar? pretty sure he was

or are you only looking for washed up veterans? (grant hill can still get it in i guess)

MaNs1 · Post #17 » by **MaNs1** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:33 pm

They are wayyyyyyy too old with long history of injuries .......

THey would struggle to win more than 30-35 games.....

tanat-0s · Post #18 » by **tanat-0s** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:55 pm

Where is Spree?

triplet1984 · Post #19 » by **triplet1984** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:02 pm

No, that team can't win the title. In fact, they would have problems with the Celtics, Pistons, and Spurs.

TonyMontana · Post #20 » by **TonyMontana** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:17 pm

UTMCretin wrote:That is a horrible team. Lottery, at least.