Page 1 of 2
Can this team win it all? Or how far can it go?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:47 am
by miula
If we put together 90s all-stars who haven't won any ring into one team(in their current status), how far can it go? Can it win the champ?
PG - Jason Kidd
SG - Eddie Jones
SF - Grant Hill
PF - Chris Webber
C - Erick Dampier
Bench - Juwan Howard / Jim Jackson / Penny Hardaway / Theo Ratliff / Brevin Kinght
I will predict maybe its a 55~60 win team
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:48 am
by farzi
6-8th seed in the east, not even playoffs in the west.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:51 am
by LiquidFire
55-60 win team.
Haha, thats priceless.
bad team btw
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:03 am
by raps4life~
its not a bad team. kidd, webber and hill. it would be a pretty good team. dont know about championship tho.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:04 am
by El Turco
wow that s a bad bench if i seen one. especially considering the injury prone line up.
35-40 wins.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:05 am
by penbeast0
Good team but gutless other than Kidd . . . Dampier was a 90s All-Star?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:11 am
by Cevap
lotto
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:12 am
by mattyj
I dont remember Dampier, Jackson or Knight making the all-star team??
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:14 am
by miula
there aren't that many all stars who haven't won any rings that still play the game now...
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:25 am
by kbitboc
What about Kevin Garnett? Didnt he make the all-star in 1997?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:34 am
by BobbySura
jones and webber are basically done.
kidd can't score worth a crap.
hill can't carry a team anymore.
dampier is too inconsistent
jackson has been done for years
penny too
ratliff as well
that team is so terrible defensively i think they'd make the miami heat right now look like the 1990s bulls.
everyone in their primes and that team is easily a dynasty, but too many done, injury prone terrible defenders to matter now.
Re: Can this team win it all? Or how far can it go?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:33 am
by TMACFORMVP
miula wrote:If we put together 90s all-stars who haven't won any ring into one team(in their current status), how far can it go? Can it win the champ?
PG - Jason Kidd
SG - Eddie Jones
SF - Grant Hill
PF - Chris Webber
C - Erick Dampier
Bench - Juwan Howard / Jim Jackson / Penny Hardaway / Theo Ratliff / Brevin Kinght
I will predict maybe its a 55~60 win team
Meaning how they are now? Frankly they'd be in the Derrick Rose sweepstakes if that was the case.
Prime? Hardaway would start, as would Ratliff and that team, THEN would likely be the favorite to win it all.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:54 am
by Duiz
The problem is the chemistry, and it doesn't look like the would be one when there isn't more of a volume scorer in the lineup. If we could change Hill with Igoudala then I think it would be better.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:31 am
by UTMCretin
That is a horrible team. Lottery, at least.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:58 am
by Patterns
I am not sure how well they can work together though. Hill, Kidd, Webber all need the ball to be effective.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:17 am
by Knicksfan20
Was AI not a 90's allstar? pretty sure he was
or are you only looking for washed up veterans? (grant hill can still get it in i guess)
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:33 pm
by MaNs1
They are wayyyyyyy too old with long history of injuries .......
THey would struggle to win more than 30-35 games.....
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:55 pm
by tanat-0s
Where is Spree?
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:02 pm
by triplet1984
No, that team can't win the title. In fact, they would have problems with the Celtics, Pistons, and Spurs.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:17 pm
by TonyMontana
UTMCretin wrote:That is a horrible team. Lottery, at least.